Explain to me what's wrong with socialism in a limited resources world

Explain to me what's wrong with socialism in a limited resources world.

Everything you shill

Define socialism and then we can talk.

Its not limited. I bet I could make a car out of jew body parts

>((((banker))))
everytiem, you kikes
everytiem

>Jew posts about his job
>Debate me, goyim

The banker isnt going to take 19 out of 20 jobs. However the immigrants will. For less pay, shitty work.

You failed. Soc won.

the banker is jewish and should be killed. all of the cookies belong to the worker because he is white and they were his all along. the immigrant had his own cookies but he always ruins them so now he's trying to ruin the workers cookies

...... then why don't more people become bankers

NOGGIN IS

J
O
G
G
I
N

>a banker, a worker and an immigrant are sitting at a table with 20 cookies
>the banker takes 19 cookies, as that's the average wage a banker earns
>the worker takes one cookie, payment for the work he has done
>the immigrant causes rape and violent crime to skyrocket
hm

What is wrong with Israel having more diversity?

#OpenBordersForIsrael

>/leftypol/ jew

I have seen everything now.

But merchant, the problems with the American economy have grown with socialism in the US

It's not like the US economy was WORSE when it was freer

replace the word banker with the word international jewry.

But (((Kurt))) said he wasn't a Jew, he only used that term to use a "Get out of jail free" card

>wealth is just cookies lying on the table and the bad mean guy just takes them :)
why all liberals think about economics like a 5 year old girl?

Because nobody sane wants to be ruled by Jewish commissars, who starve millions to death.

(((oy vey)))

>Explain to me what's wrong with socialism in a limited resources world

The only person that can decide I have more than I need, is a omniscient being and myself

>limited resources
>immediately opt to mismanage them

Niggers

And if we took fair share the immigrant is still getting some

>a banker and a worker sit in a table with 20 cookies
>the banker invites 30 immigrants
>tells the worker he is going to need a loan to feed them

it implies you have a right to what someone else has earned

Picture is wrong. Banker gives last cookie to immigrant. Immigrant costs less. Crumbs to woker.

What if the immigrant started cooking his own cookies? In his own country? Starting to build his own cookie economy? Instead of leaving his own country and weakening it by lacking manpower to build up infrastructure and cookie factories?

So many questions

7 Refugees suddenly sit down at the table with a Jew, who then tells the worker
'Better get cooking some more cookies, these guys are hungry'
He then eats the Workers cookie

That's right goys the messicans are not your enemy its the bankers....

first off, with 20 cookies there was always going to be an argument as you cant evenly split that without splitting a cookie, and no one wants only part of a cookie, its just not how humans work.

therefore, you must look to who made or payed for the cookies.

if one of them made/ payed for the cookies, they have a right to decide how the cookies are distributed.

if someone else did, then they get to decide, and thus you can blame them for deciding the banker gets more.

if left on the table for whoever to take, we must conclude any rules are implied not enforced, thus anarchy, and while you should hope someone is nice enough to share you cannot rely on human nature to do so and have only yourself to blame for not acting quickly enough to stop the banker.

never let anyone fool you with these shitty little graphics, life is almost never so simple or one dimensional.

Fuck socialism, I'm going to commit some serious assault unless the "banker" can explain why he just helped himself to all the fucking cookies. Unless it's like the real world where he uses the extra cookies to buy security from people like me.

economic calculation problem.

i don't want you to have my fucking money just because you are too fat and retarded to work and study

because turning humanity into a bunch of worker ants with nothing to aspire to besides putting in their government mandated work hours and then consuming whatever media on the iShit electronic whatever is the greyest most huxleyesque dystopian future possible

people need adversity to develop

the whole point of economics is to figure out how to best distribute limited resources
socialism : give 20 cookies to pedro and jamal, they do nothing except have kids they cant afford
capitalism : steve gets 2 cookies, but in exchange has to make 5 cookies and develops a better, cheaper way of baking them

Thats the worst fucking image I have ever seen.
Its explains nothing of any use to anyone.

oh fuck we got another jew that weaseled his way here to spread Communism...... History repeats itself

>Explain to me what's wrong with socialism in a limited resources world.

You act as though the world has limited resources, when it is only a socialist world where resources are limited, not by nature, but by the statesmen, some of whom must think they are gods or descendants of god.

The economic calculation problem.

A kike steals 19 cookies then gets gentiles to fight over 1. Capitalism is bad.

actually the banker has 5 cookies but promises the immigrant that with their combined vote, they can split the workers cookies for themselves, even though the worker made all the cookies.

Makes sense... if somebody gave the 3 of them 20 cookies. But what if the banker baked 20 cookies himself, and the worker baked 2, and the immigrant came along and said "Liberals say you got to give me some of those cookies you guys baked and worked so hard at"

Name a single functional socialist country that has ever existed

WHO MAKES THE COOKIES??? THAT IS THE IMPORTANT QUESTION. THAT PERSON GETS TO EAT AS MANY COOKIES AS THEY MAKE AND IF HE GIVES YOU A CRUMB YOU SHOULD BE GRATEFUL!

socialism doesn't account for human error
any system based on metaphysical materialism ignores human error
that's one of the big things that Marx failed to understand from Hegel
not even physicists could prove a purely materialistic model for the universe, it doesn't work
that's why we have theories like dark matter and the idea that our universe is a simulation, it doesn't make any sense by materialistic models

more like the banker takes out a loan to himself on behalf of the worker, then gives the immigrant 1 cookie every year until the worker has no cookies left.

Venezuela.

Back in Marx's day, socialists understood that increasing the reserve army of labour through immigration decreased both the wages of the worker and the opportunities of the worker.

I hate the nu-left. Hate hate hate.

>what's wrong with socialism in a limited resources world
Human Nature and Free Will.

It's never going to work, hombre.