Thought experiment;

Thought experiment;
Ethnostates should be a human right.

ITT help me form an argument

Other urls found in this thread:

data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/en/Sociala/Sociala__ikgad__iedz__iedzskaits/IS0093.px/table/tableViewLayout2/?rxid=403a84be-f9d2-4741-9081-70875ad18fdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Depends on how do you define an ethnostate. Should Austria and Germany be one ethnostate? What about basques having their own ethnostate? Should Scotland be a separate ethnostate? What about Northern Ireland? Should Belarus be united with Russia? Questions, questions...

Some people would define the freedom of self-association as a human right which is basically the smallest-scale possible of an ethnostate. Besides considering most people, wealthy white countries excluded, basically live in them or in communities or places similar to them anyway, so for most people it's a de facto right anyway.

what the heck is that picture? no way is sweden only 6,8% foreigners

1. Classify ethnicities. More than a specified deveation from one gene type constitutes a new classification.
2. Mark at lease on state to be the bastion of the ethnicity. (germany OR Astria) australians and Americans would not have an ethnostate because the inhabitants descend from an ethnostate from abroad.

That's just the total who weren't born there. It doesn't include Arabs, Somalis, etc. who are the children of immigrants.

from 2012

Also nice trips

Perfect example of why the EU isn't remotely fair. You can't possibly argue that a working class Brit is benefiting the same as a poor Pole or Romanian. Look at the massively lopsided EU migration rates.

>bitch about having your own independent country for years
>flee from it in one month because Russia didn't like it

Geographic and ecological features of a land are just as important to a culture as traditions, rites, customs, etc. Diasporas only serve to separate peoples and weaken other cultures (small enclaves of people living in foreign lands look nothing like either the homeland or the adopted country, i.e. a bunch of Somalis living in Minnesota.)

use the native americans as a case study of what happens when forced integration occurs on a group of people. (their population went from 10million to 300 thousand in about 3 decades)

>Estonia 15%
>Latvia 16%
Do they still consider Russians foreigners?

Then take a look at the european americans you dumbass. You're arguing that immigrants killing off natives equals a more advanced civilisation. Or look at your own fucking country.

A shame niggers are more resistant to smallpox

Why does poland have zero foreign eu citizens? Why don't they want to live in poland?

None of your business, Schulz

They are probably counting alien passport holders as "foreign citizens" even though they aren't.

Alien 3

Isn't Latvia only like 60% Latvian?

70*

...

Also the people that have been counted. There are millions of illegal refugees in sweden.

Look, you are an ethnostate thanks to the commies. Because they didn't give a fuck about deporting millions of people. Modern Ukraine tries to be one - one language, one people etc. But in the end it loses both people and land.

Is this wrong then?

data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/en/Sociala/Sociala__ikgad__iedz__iedzskaits/IS0093.px/table/tableViewLayout2/?rxid=403a84be-f9d2-4741-9081-70875ad18fdf

Portugal - 4,2%?

It's majority the Brazilians Pardos and the African Kangz