Libs BTFO.. Even USA Today admits the democrats are losers

Libs BTFO.. Even USA Today admits the democrats are losers

lOl people are waking up

>Even Whoresey, delusional as he is seen this coming somewhat.

>"Even" USA Today
>Article written by the leader of the largest Tea Party political committee
Damn, even the Tea Party has turned against the Democrats?

Wtf are you trying to say here cuck

Democrats can't win because all the ultra high IQ people live in New York and California and America has the electoral college.

...

...

Just the richest and influencial. Not high iq at all just because all media tells you how important they are

Well, high IQ people get sent to liberal indoctrination camps known as universities so it's not really a surprise. The ability to solve simple problems within time constraints is good but it doesn't necessarily mean a firm grasp of reality. It's by continually telling these people how smart they are that they manage to prevent them from ever questioning any thought they've ever had.

who cares?

worth pointing out though that conservatives and classical liberals still outrank liberals in IQ by a mile, and are less prone to all sorts of mental illness.

>cuck detected

Based black man

Bump

...

They said the same thing in 2000. Its just a pendulum swing. Let the regressives have their fun in the mean time.

Politicians didn't make your community shit nigger, you did.

Stop expecting politicians to make your shitty neighborhoods better with gibs.

...

>regressives

How would you define this?

Bump

...

lol is this legit

>implying Dem's harsh gun control laws didn't turn Chicago into Chiraq
>implying Dem's welfare state didn't demotivate blacks since they could get free food and housing by being worse niggers than they were before
>implying Dem's constant propaganda message of "REPUBLICANS IZ RAYSIS" isn't the reason blacks blindly flock to them
It's like you're blaming the random Euro for the latest truck of peace happening. They can't help what their peers and leadership impose on them anymore than you can.

...

Lol this is worse than Birth of a nation

I love how it has all the live scenes, but as soon as they cut to successful there is just a fucking stock image.

Libs' fault for encouraging BLM and WE WUZ KANGZ nonsense

Why do libs have a fascination with beheading and assassination? Whats up with that

hahaha good eye

It's the liberals trying their hand at predictive programming

>motivate all your voter base to move to the same 2-3 states
>wonder why you lose when you have an electoral college

DELETE THIS

...

Cutie

okay if someone that literally will work for scraps in sweatshops for 3 is being given my job and my money as wealfare to make up for the fact that they do not make any money how would that make me? also contacts they have plenty and language they dont need

that is cute? come on user

Go ahead. Keep dehumanizing people who have legitimate concerns. Call them shit. Call them deplorable. Call them fly-overs. Call them racist.
You're throwing away elections.

>jewtube

What a faggot

>the left gets too cocky and pushes shit a little too far
>moderate majority gets tired of their bullshit and turns the other way
>double down and go even further left, dividing even their most radical supporters into warring factions
truly a winning strategy

That sen looks like a 2 dollar hooker

S H A D I L A Y brothers!

can you not read moron its clear as day look at the donkey aka liberals facial expression

hes basically saying republicans are making a massive comeback and this must be pre 2014 as they had not retaken the senate yet.

Ill spell it out for you

Its not republicans that dont have a future its the liberals.

RIP in piss Democrats

>Checked and kekked

...

>hispanic voters meme
Republicans can win every national election by just pandering to whites

>implying Dem's harsh gun control laws didn't turn Chicago into Chiraq

They didn't. They were only implemented in 1978 after Chicago had been a gang-ridden warzone for over a decade.

>implying Dem's welfare state didn't demotivate blacks

Things started going to shit for urban blacks prior to LBJ's welfare state. A lot of that was a reaction to the Moynihan report, which came out in 1965 and summarized data from the late-50's through early-60's.

The trends were all terrible even then. Basically what happened is that low-skilled manufacturing jobs started being reduced by efficiency/early automation, and the illiterate rural southern blacks who had flocked to the city for those jobs now had nothing to occupy them for 8 to 12 hours per day. Their kids formed gangs, in a replication of African tribal structures, but with modern firearms.

>implying Dem's constant propaganda message of "REPUBLICANS IZ RAYSIS" isn't the reason blacks blindly flock to them

They vote for gibs. It's pretty simple.

A lot of "low-skilled" jobs used to have "advancement tracks" - you'd learn, move up a bit, learn some more, move up, etc.

This was possible when your low-skilled workers were mostly 95-100IQ whites.

But when the very entry-level jobs are taken by 85-90IQ Central Americans, the advancement track ends. That's bad for society overall. A modest beginning didn't used to imply a modest future like it does these days.