Why is he such a fucking sophist? Every 'debate' on his show is either him going against a low-hanging fruit liberal caricature or an intelligent liberal whose arguments he continually misrepresents.
Let's not forget the live dicking Jon Stewart gave him that ended his career for ten years:
>Invite on liberal retard >Make mouth-agape-pretending-not-to-understand face so Liberal keeps trying to explain his point and of course just makes himself look dumber and dumber
Anyway, Libcucks have had shows like this for decades. It doesn't hurt anyone.
Also, the Jon Stewart thing was infuriating - Stewart was a disingenuous mong and intellectual coward, but all he had to do to impress the morons that make up cable news viewers was adopt the mannerism of someone winning a debate.
It was Goronchev tier.
Anyway, Tucker's schtick will get old unless he once in awhile brings on someone not retarded and feigns losing.
Luke Moore
>dicking All Jon Stewart was crack sarcastic strawman jokes to change the subject, and Tucker is not a comedian so he didn't have rofl ecks dee funny jokes to counter him.
Michael Garcia
you write like a jew. we see you here all the time, seeking validating for your victim complexes. we know you. Your lies and tricks are no good here. This place is full of jewish parasites that hate other jews like you. They sniff you out like corpse dogs.
Evan Parker
>low-hanging fruit liberal caricature that's the majority of them bro their party is broken into pieces.
Ian Kelly
>Anyway, Libcucks have had shows like this for decades They haven't really. You'll notice that a lot of the liberals that Tucker brings on are never on any other major networks. I don't know of any major left-leaning pundit show that makes it a habit of bringing on retarded conservatives. That kind of intellectual dishonesty doesn't fly in the liberal demographic (other types of intellectual dishonesty maybe, just not that kind).
Jon Stewart wasn't debating them. He was illustrating how stupid and divisive the show was.
James Morales
Isn't that what Jon Stewart did for entertainment?
Julian Moore
The fact that you're so pissed off about it means he's doing his job great.
Luke Campbell
He's not triggered at all you stupid snek. It's valid criticism of a formula that people seem to gobble up
Charles Thompson
more often than not his guest is not some strawman he picked up off the street. he very often has leading members of the liberal party or liberal movements on.
The liberal movement is just that batshit crazy right now.
Andrew Ross
Aren't all leftist arguments low hanging fruit?
Julian James
This guy's gets it
Brandon James
>Some video from 2006 Tucker was born last year you lying kike
Jaxson Rodriguez
Completely untrue.
And shows like The Daily Show or Michael Moore's old show didn't even have talking heads from recognized institutions. They'd frequently resort to Man-On-The-Street mockery.
Just see all the networks that will give idiots like David Duke airtime so they can fuck over Trump.
Sometimes it backfires - See Richard Spencer - The heavily edited Atlantic tape made it seem like they were booking a retarded Nazi, but he ended up being...Not a retarded Nazi.
Also - See Alex Jones on NBC just a few days ago.
>That kind of intellectual dishonesty doesn't fly in the liberal demographic (other types of intellectual dishonesty maybe, just not that kind).
It's less prevelant now than it was in the 90's and early 2000's, but I don't think thats owing to any kind of intellectual rigour - It's just that they don't like giving "platforms" to these people and prefer closed system circle jerks.
>Stewart wasn't debating
Precisely. He was being a hypocrite and trying to deflect criticism by running and hiding behind "it's just a joke bro". He was also unwittingly putting forward the concept that echo-chambers are good because they keep the social peace.
He's a retard.
Charles Martin
>Intellectual dishonesty >Doesnt fly for liberals >Were too sophisticated to make fun of dumb outliers Kys
Dumb outliers is literally the reason you try to ban rifles.
Robert Jones
Also David duke and Richard Spencer. Both also cut off after they said some bad stuff out of context and before they could say anything that really makes you think
Luke Baker
Jon Stewart's argument is that he did it for comedy.
Jon Stewart also wants his political opinions to be taken seriously, except for when he doesn't.
This methodolog applied to the right makes the left cry about "trolls".
It's only semi-valid. OP either is ignorant of the facts or omits by choice that many of the guests DO have positions of prominence in leftist institutions.
Mason Kelly
Yeah bringing Alex Jones on multiple times and taking him seriously was worse than anything Tucker has ever done.
Alex Jones is a joke, but that doesnt mean you cant listen for fun.
Bentley Peterson
It's called television you shitwit
Hudson Taylor
>stop using our tactics against us! Reeeeeeeeeee!
Levi Mitchell
change the chanel dick turd
Hudson Wright
That Jon Stewart video is just like >ugh you're terrible >because like ugh you're bad I don't have to explain myself I'll just mock you and try to manipulate the social dynamic with my body language
Adam Parker
>Every 'debate' on his show is either him going against a low-hanging fruit liberal caricature The fact that he can easily find one every single time is a powerful message in its own right. The left IS a low hanging fruit caricature.
Christian Green
he's not a sophist. he makes real arguments based on evidence. you're right about low-hanging fruit though.