Trump just addmited that russia meddled in our election
Trump
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
reuters.com
twitter.com
You seriously think Russia did nothing whatsoever to influence our election? Not even a single propaganda news post?
Huh? The tweet said that the Obama Adminstration knew about Russian Efforts and did nothing.
The same Adminstration was the one to make a big deal about Russian Hacking in the first place - and your takeaway is RUSSIA BAD?
...
FAKE NEWS
Reminder to Sage and Report/Ignore shill posts
This is my first time posting it look it up
This ain't sage
It's never EVER been questioned that a foreign government might try to influence the public's vote, remember those Russian troll farms? Not to mention the US government's blatant regime building.
What hasn't been proven is that Russia compromised the voting infrastructure to directly alter the vote
yes they meddled
go to rt.com
its 24/7 anti US government propaganda in english
this certainly meets the definition of meddling
and if youre honest youll notice from now on that everyone official when describing russian meddling could easily be describing RT
because THEY ARE
So he's pretty much admitting he's an illegitimate president. What an idiot.
Yes.Thats something trump claimed never happend, but now he's changing the story to Obama failing to deal with it
He's not too bright. Only orange
when did he say that
This wouldnt be news if he hadnt. Hence the fake news propaganda punchline. The man is sinking in a zogswamp of his own making. I like that his family is "jewish"
By that logic the US media also meddles.
People who blog meddle.
>this wouldn't be news if it wasn't
2 scoops.
RT wasn't really pro-Trump though
yes
so does israel
ever heard of aipac?
its why the russia story is blatant fake fucking news
but isn't he referring to the news reports?
>propaganda is only OK when it's US multinationals and Hungarian Jews pushing their narratives
The same administration that publicly admonished the republican candidate for even suggesting the election could be fucked with
In the tweet what do think?
covfefe
All that we know is that Putin called to help Trump win. Kind of like how Obama called and supported candidates in other elections as well? Officials from other countries always pull this shit. It's as close to hacking as when someone leaves themselves logged into Facebook and you make their status "lollll hacked xD"
>covfefe
So naturally you have proof that he claimed it, correct?
you fucking retarded commie
when did trump claim russia did no "election meddling"
ITT: 18year olds that know nothing of international politics and intel programs think superpower election fuckery is a new phenomena!
You Americans are fucking unbelievable. There probably is not a national elections that has taken place anywhere on the globe since the end of WW2 that your nation has not tried to (at best) influence or at worst completely subvert and undermine.
And then there are all the coups you have instigated and the despotic regimes you have put in place and propped up.
And now, someone (((supposedly))) does it to you and it is if you have been given a death sentence.
You are a nation of children, a nation of hypocrites. Hypocrites of the highest order.
Bastion of Democracy my ass. Everything your nations does globally flies in the face 100 per cent of what Democracy is.
Fuck off.
Of course they meddled. They would be stupid not to.
Doesn't mean they changed a single vote.
"Muh Russia" is a meme
All the time
You mean Obama's administration knew about election meddling and did nothing about it.
its certainly news that russia TRIED to hack voting machines considering trump mentioned it and was widely mocked by obama and fake news jews
youtube.com
this video is so god damn hilarious now
That's correct. Did you just now figure it out? Scott Adams blogged and he's 100% certain he's being monitored by the government because of it.
He said it back in January your retarded Spain posting plebbit fag.
It is interesting to see the US shift from preferring dictators from 1945-1980 and then gradually starting to support (((democracy))). The reason is rather obvious: democracies are easier to manipulate than a dictator.
dammit i actually fell for this shill
you guys are getting legitimately good
this site is probably dead
Okay when did he say that they did meddle in the the election
We know Russia Russia had nothing to do with the Wikileaks. So now the CIA are claiming Russia tried to access 29 state voter bases but failed. Some top level hackers Russia is-leaving a footprint. Must have been novices. AND, if it was somehow Russia and not the CIA planting Russian footprints which candidate would they be trying to help??? Their good friend Hillary who bent over backwards to give them 20% of American Uranium, who is so criminally comprimised they could blackmail her for anything they wanted or some new guy named Trump who vowed to put America First. if YOU were a Russia strategist which candidate would YOU want? PLUS, Putin says he has many dirty details about Obama-things Obama made him promise not to tell??? If it was me I would want to see the highly blackmailable puppet Clinton elected.
trump is a criminal, but nothing will happen until congress grows a spine
This acknowledgement only shows that Russia tried hacking us...it does not impky Trump colluded with the Russians.
The Russians try to have the US, in many departments everyday...so does China....so does Pakistan, and so on and so on.
This thread is meaningless.
correct, stupid
Well that narrows it down ...
leastrarepepe.jpg
Those supported "democracies" are not democratic . Indeed, they are just dictatorships on standby.
But still the point I make is this: All this "our election was hacked" crap is both laughable and embarrassing. After all that the US has done across the globe to now express such outrage is idiocy at best and a collective psychosis at worst.
It's OK. Most of the world still suffer from the same mental malaise and as a result continue to blindly support you.
More like if Russia leaked classified info that a candidate did something wrong, why are we more mad at Russia for leaking that info than at the candidate for doing what she did. Like if the info wasn't leaked than what she did was okay? If a neighbor tells you your dog has been shitting on your carpet, you punish your dog, not your neighbor.
So he addimited that Russia did hack the election
The spineless cannot grow a spine. Ask a jellyfish
What crime?
NO ONE HACKED YOUR ELECTION YOU WANKER. If anything happened, Russia sought to influence votes, and thats that.
NOTHING WAS "HACKED"
OY, knock it off, you bloody wanker
For being a big meanie
nah its that the jews have more power and democracy lets the media dictate what happens
dictators in power is much better for americans
Trump addimited to it
All in the name of maintaining American economic and military hegemony. And that is all.
Fuck, our world sucks. What have we become?
>OK, knocking off now
FFS, he doesnt know his ass from his elbow!
>dictators in power is better for America
You still don't realize that America is just a vassal state for the kikes, globalists, illuminati, whatever you want to call them.
What was hacked? Trolls on Twitter and RT propaganda isn't "hacking", m8. Hell, the only thing that was alleged to be hacked by the Russian was the DNC server. And that was never even turned over to the FBI, so we have no idea who was actually responsible.
Basically says
>"Hey if this shit actually happened then you should have caught it why didn't you fucking catch it you dumb king nigger"
now it is
i dont believe it was back then
that was the transitional jewish takeover period
backdoor way of getting paper ballots and voter id in every state
Kikes have been pushing their agenda here since at least the 1940s when they immigrated here en mass. The switch from dictators to democracy didn't take place until the early 1990s.
Right now, leaders need not accept responsibility because they can say that people can change things through voting differently when indeed things like stopping immigration, and ending Political Correctness are never up for debate. If there was a permanent leadership without voting, people would get the change they want through insurgencies or behind-the-scenes manipulation because there isn't that plausible deniabilty, that fig-leaf of excuse that the power is in the hands of the voters, user.
We have a shitton of American media in Russia, openly financed from the West, that talk shit about Putin all the time. Yet nobody cries about meddling. Get your shit together, pussies. If a foreign website criticizing an American politician is enough to fuck up your politics, then it's your goddamn problem and fault.
right, once they worked their way up our bureaucracies, implemented their semitic laws, and flooded us with authoritarian voting minorities
i love rt
then you guys should go full steam ahead with this info. yea, here is your chance liberals, don't think, just charge right in .
They have centuries of practice in infiltrating a nation's power structure. It only took them a few years to take over the US.
You can see their work as far back as 1965, when they pushed for immigration laws that will replace us, while pushing through affirmative action and the Voting Rights Act.
no one has ever claimed that russia wasn't trying to meddle with the election you retarded larper
That's not even what they are investigating at this point, lol. The stuff you're talking about is not only well known, but even if it were proven 100% that Hillary would have won if not for the Russians, Trump would still be the president.
"hacked" is just a shorter way of saying that they were running an interference campaign. But your statement that nothing was "Hacked" is incorrect, because we already know that computer systems were the subject of intrusions or attempted intrusions by them. At one point (And I haven't seen a source which can confirm whether they failed or succeeded), they even targeted computers which they knew were used to connect and upload programming to voting machines.
Again, none of this means that there should (Or could) be a do-over of the election. All it means is that we need to figure out everyone involved, everything they did, how they did it and why. If the goal of the Russians was to cause dissatisfaction and distrust in our government (Which seems to be the case) by causing Americans to contest the election and causing people around the world to question our reliability, then chances are they'll probably be doing it in the next election, so it makes sense that we need to learn to better protect against it. Who knows which party or which politician they'll go after next. Could be Trump, we don't know.
Dont give a fuck if they did; Hillary was the lesser of two evils, if trump is truly a bad goy. But heres the thing... Let it go man, Russia did not hack the fucking DNC server that was never EVER examined by the FBI or LEOS. Crowd strike made a bullshit accusation. Let it go.
Election meddling for Hillary, dipshit.
This tbqh senpai
>Thinking his opposition doesn't already know or that his supporters will care.
>We know Russia Russia had nothing to do with the Wikileaks.
No, you just keep repeating that. They did. American agencies know that they did, foreign agencies know that they did, even private technology and security companies know that they did.
It doesn't change the contents of the leaks, so I don't understand why some people are so dead set on deluding themselves.
>Trump just addmited that russia meddled in our election
Dumbass commie cant read... This "Just out" as in "hot off the Press"...
>>You see Commie, hes the Prez... He should be the 1st one to know these things.... He should be the one have press conferences releasing this info.. But he's got to read it when everyone else dose in the Daily Globalist Fake News affiliate...
This thread is moving so fast no one will notice this is just an attempt to distract people from the healthcare repeal.
>thinking IDs persist across threads
Hello newfriend. Please shill elsewhere.
Proof?
He's gonna be fine. Not under investigation for that he wasn't involved. Hes gonna play their game and flip the whole table over on them.
>A bunch of people claim the Russians were involved
>Literally no evidence
Seth Rich leaked the info to Wikileaks. It wasn't the Russians.
Agencies said so, and they would never lie to us, right? They've never been caught lying to us repeatedly. You just can't trust this Wiky Leeks as if they've never published things that turned out to be unverified and false.
Those are exactly my thoughts on it. It's amazing that anyone even defends Wikileaks when nobody has even seen the Wikileaks emails except CNN.
1 - either continue to fight against the narrative and be attacked by the kookspiracy
2 - go along with narrative for a moment and blame the entire thing on obama people
#2 is the power move now. surely there was some russian ip somewhere that pinged a server at some point in 2016 that they will claim was an attack. so it's stupid to try and fight it. use their own narrative against them, and now you can direct the special council to investigate all the obama people for their hand in it.
No, that is conspiracy bullshit with absolutely no evidence. I don't understand why you guys have to make up this incredible story when this is commonplace stuff. Our intelligence services meddle in elections as often as the Russians do. It does not invalidate the results. It does not mean that Trump is illegitimate.
All it means is that we sit down, take a look at everything and determine how best to prevent it in the future. They didn't do it because they want to be best buddies with Trump, they did it because they wanted a destabilizing effect, a reduction of trust in government, etc. There's no reason why they wouldn't target Trump himself next time around, so it would serve us well to stop pretending that this does not happen.
They have published false information by mistake more than once. Ask Senator Tom Carper about those forged letters they tried to say were his. There's a difference between never being wrong, and never admitting that you were wrong.
He was innocent, not he's exposed to a potential charge of obstruction of justice because he tried to stop an investigation that was only going to exonerate him.
now he's exposed**
Shill harder fagboy, you've almost convinced me.
You gotta earn that $.05. Brock isn't a charity.
He's only posting this so the media will always try to prove him wrong, thus proving him right.
>Hillary was the lesser of two evils
hahahahahahahaha you actually believe this? Also, holy shit you can't string together a coherent post.
>that is conspiracy bullshit with absolutely no evidence
Oh, the irony....
Where's the shilling?
Not very ironic. There's no evidence for Seth Rich leaking, lol. Meanwhile, there is evidence that those things were in fact stolen and leaked by hackers employed by and/or working with Russian GRU.
Again, this doesn't change who won the election, so I don't understand why you need to make up a fanciful story about seth rich, the silliness of which is on par with Pizza-gate.
Didn't you read the article that replied with?
>there was evidence the emails were stolen by Russia
Proof?
The article doesn't say what was hacked. Even the report that the DNI released was a joke.
Government agencies have released reports, private security firms have released reports, individuals have been named and charged by law enforcement for being part of the numerous actions which took place, even Trump himself has accidentally acknowledged it with his flippant tweeting lol. The proof is literally at your fingertips. You're just stuck in the Sup Forums cycle.
...
The only report released was 11 pages long: 7 pages were about Twitter trolls, two pages were about how RT is secretly Russian propaganda, and the last two pages said "we think Russia did it because remember when they were evil during the Cold War."
...