Is this an accurate way of mapping politics?

I created this political map the other day and posted it on facebook but I got no response so I thought I'd come here and see if you folks had any comments. Feel free to send improved versions of the politcal map.

if you went to the far left along the center line, would you be an anarcho-nationalist, and how would that play out in practical terms? I'm intrigued by your map, user

>he's never heard of anarcho-fascism
Think war tribes bound by blood.

right on - but fascism isn't on op's map, so I'm trying to relate questions specifically to that ... but I like your war blood tribe comment

I think it would be a mix of capitalism and nationalism? I was going to say capitalism instead of anarchy at first, but capitalism isn't that anarcaic.

Interesting - also, I'm enjoying the center axis meeting points / so anarcho-globalism, socialist globalism, national socialism etc - there are a lot of fascinating nuances in there

>implying the center is inherently peaceful.
You might want to rename the center to centrism...

Yeah that's a good point. Thanks

I quite like it, senpai. Plus, one could always add a z-axis. (From pacifism to militarism)

Whats the definition for being economical-left and social-right?

National socialism?

...

>Is this accurate?
Nope.
Socialism and Anarchism are not opposites. In fact, many of the early Anarchist movements were Socialist in nature.

Why not this:
>economically - freedom vs. central planning
> social (laws) - permissive vs. restrictive
> social (responsibilities) - individualistic vs. collectivistic
> militarily - pacifistic vs. militaristic
> organizational (size) - regionalistic/nationalistic vs. Globalistic
> religion - secular vs. religious

Plus environment, I guess.

You're welcome. Now draw that 7-D map, will you?

pic related is the only good system I've seen so far

axis will always fail unless you make a bunch of them and give up on trying to represent them graphically

by civilization he means "rational planning" and shit, basically rationalism in politics, the thing that unites most revolutionaries

hold on, I'll post what he means by the other terms as well

I am not sure where this went
This is getting really advanced lol

>

liberty and equality are exactly what you're thinking,

fraternity is community, interconectivity, civil society, solidarity, a sense of community, belonging, caring about your similars, like being a nationalist or a patriot, or caring for members of your religion or tribe

peace is security, safety, stability, "the idea that individuals and society ought to be protected from violent death, violence in general, loss of livelihood, and most importantly fear of the first three" (definition by Hobbes)

civilization is rational planning, empashis on arts and science as a matter of principle, rationalism in politics

loyalty is devotion or faithfulness towards someone or something, be it the nation, God, your country, etc

I found this

this, we need a 4d compass
these graphs are not in general, but to particualr works he analysed which are representative of each of the ideologies he's analysing

8 dimensional XDD

My favourite colour is orange, so that checks out.

how are we supposed to interpret the blue and red text?

something like "libertarian tolerant monarchy"?

and is he seriously implying people in the gambia and DPRK are freer than in the UK because they ain't monarchies?

sure, now that you have foreign policy map you just have to map every other policy and layer them to create a 3d map.

"Accurate political mapping" should be at least 5D.
Its impossible to map it in 2D space.

Well shit at least its not 1D like normal politcal maps (right / left)

>jewbook

fuck off with this gay-ass slide bullshit normie faggotry

I like this

I find it extremely offensive that you call me a normie.