Wow...how stupid can you really get? Especially considering how famous this statue is in New Orleans.
Maximum keks to anyone who can shoop her banner into a flag of the Confederacy.
Lets get the armchair SJW's calling for its removal.
Source is legit city guide.
nola.com
nobody normal is gonna show up to protect that shit if you neo nazi alt right spencer dicksucking asswipes keep lumping everyone thats slightly conservative as one of yours.
Bumping because slide is steep today.
JEANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEE
Change your flag dickwipe.
You don't deserve to fly it.
Joan was a Christian warrior and pivotal to the liberty precedent.
Reminder: St. Joan was burned at the stake by w**te males for being a strong woman. They saw her as a threat to their misogynist narrow minded system
Hundreds of years later they're back to their old ways
You kidding me?
She was captured by her enemies and punished for crimes against the state.
Reminder: just a figure head
>punished for crimes against the state.
She was burnt for being a heretic.
>SJWs want to take down the statue of probably the only female which has done something that required balls
anti-Jeannu fags will burn
And who ran the state?
This guy is giving you prots a bad name
As if the flag wasn't enough
Wrong, she was illegally put on trial by a bunch of heretics, so that they could kill a lawful prisoner of war who they feared.
Of course it should be taken down. She's a symbol of white patriarchy of how the white cis gendered male will dominate no matter how much you achieve.
Dude
She was killed by the English who were ruled by the Catholic church.
Her enemies
Besides, the venerate Mulan who may never have dressed male yet demonize Joan. Is it because I dare say she was Christian?
she was white and not even american tho
we gotta replace her with a statue representing all the african-american peoples that have died to build this country
Wrong, the church opposed the trail, it was set up by the english
>he trial for heresy was politically motivated. The tribunal was composed entirely of pro-English and Burgundian clerics, and overseen by English commanders including the Duke of Bedford and the Earl of Warwick.[69] In the words of the British medievalist Beverly Boyd, the trial was meant by the English Crown to be "...a ploy to get rid of a bizarre prisoner of war with maximum embarrassment to their enemies".[51] Legal proceedings commenced on 9 January 1431 at Rouen, the seat of the English occupation government.[70] The procedure was suspect on a number of points, which would later provoke criticism of the tribunal by the chief inquisitor who investigated the trial after the war.[71]
nder ecclesiastical law, Bishop Cauchon lacked jurisdiction over the case.[72] Cauchon owed his appointment to his partisan support of the English Crown, which financed the trial. The low standard of evidence used in the trial also violated inquisitorial rules.[73] Clerical notary Nicolas Bailly, who was commissioned to collect testimony against Joan, could find no adverse evidence.[74] Without such evidence the court lacked grounds to initiate a trial. Opening a trial anyway, the court also violated ecclesiastical law by denying Joan the right to a legal adviser. In addition, stacking the tribunal entirely with pro-English clergy violated the medieval Church's requirement that heresy trials be judged by an impartial or balanced group of clerics. Upon the opening of the first public examination, Joan complained that those present were all partisans against her and asked for "ecclesiastics of the French side" to be invited in order to provide balance. This request was denied
Revisionist history
>Revisionist history
Claims without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.
The church itself sanctified her.