Geeeez i don't know why normies don't get it
>be Africa
>be 3 times the size of europe including the russian part of europe with only 1.5 times the population
>everyone starves to death anyway
germanys population density for instance is 8 times higher than zimbabwes
germans don't starve to death and need 1.5 billion foreign aid to feed themselves
how the fuck don't normies get it?
Other urls found in this thread:
Because it's illegal to question spearchuckers while in white countries.
when whites ran the colonial farms, Africa was Europe's source of fruits and veggies. Now you're lucky to find anything else than a Moroccan apricot.
>how the fuck don't normies get it?
Eating the fruit of knowledge casts you out from paradise. They know this at some level.
That is a damn good question. They sit on fertile land, perfect climate, sparsely populated and yet they can't feed themselves.
IMHO the only aid we should send is teacher who tell them how to farm their lands and let them sort their shit out.
You realize there is a big fucking desert in the middle right?This argument wouldnt even work on a normie.You're disregarding resource availability.
I actually never thought about it like that. Thanks for posting this.
>IMHO the only aid we should send is teacher who tell them how to farm their lands and let them sort their shit out.
well we do this for almost 50 years and nothing happens
it almost as if they were too fuckin stupid
>IMHO the only aid we should send is teacher who tell them how to farm their lands and let them sort their shit out.
We tried that. It didn't work.
>teacher who tell them how to farm their lands
Those are already there. They ignore them, because other foreign aid destroys the market for any farmers to make money.
Foreign aid is literally short-circuiting any meaningful market economy in Africa, keeping all power in the hands of the warlords and despots.
Japan has a higher GDP, you know that country is a tiny island right?
Zimbabwe isn't in the desert you retard.
And what should we do when they eat that teacher?
>Eating the fruit of knowledge casts you out from paradise. They know this at some level.
holy shit, that's a genius observation
But the shitty desert countries usually have food, at least the ones not filled with blacks.
Man no wonder black men have such big dicks, looks at the size of that continent compared to all the others.
Everyone in this thread would starve to death if they had to live in Africa. Our societies might be stronger but that doesn't mean we as individuals are immune to the structural failures and imbalances that makes Africa poor.
There are deserts in North America too retard, and Europe has tundra and shit
Most of us would likely be killed for being too white before having to worry about starving.
>muh white
Insightful comments as usual.
Which part of Africa? Did you even look at the map? There are lots to choose from. Africans don't all live on a sand dune.
>muh structural, unprovable racism
really activates my almonds
LISTEN
AND
BELIEVE
you realize, that it is the peoples not living in the dust who are starving? north africans don't starve on a large scale it is the sub-saharan africans who do
>sub-saharan
>literally not in the sahara but below it on fertile ground
The difference is, give us one good farmer and we'll learn to farm. Give Africans a farmer and they either ignore him, exploit him, or murder him.
Again with the resources. Do you really not understand that there are bigger problems? Lacking infrastructure, legal institutions, societal trust etc. I don't want to make this a question about your supposed skills with a hoe as you'd just lie to make a (poor) point. The core of the matter is that you can't fix this on an individual level.
That'd be a first.
colgate bringing the wisdom
the spirit of erasmus lives, and he's minty fresh
we gave them all of that
and they fucked it
Or!
>we could conquer the land
Literally who would stop us? Spearchuckers? Jews? If established quickly nobody could stop us.
Read up on doctor livingstons expeditions into deep africa. In most cases he was the very first white man to ever go where he did, so nobody can blame colonialism for ruining everything.
He spoke of a culture where the land is unspeakably fertile but everyone starves all the time anyways because the moment anyone tries to store something or makes even a little bit more than they need at the moment thier neighbors steal it. He wrote repeatedly about this issue, that nobody in africa has any wish or motive to excel at anything because doing so only makes one a target to ones neighbors. The moment anyone has anything more than what is hardly above starvation they are violently assaulted.
Colonialism didnt ruin africa, its just regressing back to its natural state now that colonialism is over.
South Africa was handed over to blacks as a country capable of creating a nuclear weapon, without any damage to infrastructure, legal structure or any blocades or trade-tarriffs.
Niggers fucked it up.
>Again with the resources. Do you really not understand that there are bigger problems? Lacking infrastructure, legal institutions, societal trust etc. I don't want to make this a question about your supposed skills with a hoe as you'd just lie to make a (poor) point. The core of the matter is that you can't fix this on an individual level.
If the official timeline is to believed, Africans existed LONG before Europeans ever appeared. Why didn't they just develop those things?
>they were smart enough they just didn't need them
Then why didn't they maintain the infrastructure from the colonial era after everyone left? They were trained in it.
You're a literal retard. The number one "motive" given by criminals for interracial murder in Africa is killing/raping/murdering a white is "because they are white".
It must be nice living in a bubble.
It hasn't worked, but it is still the only help we should send (on a voluntary basis). Sending food to people who don't want to feed themselves is beyond retarded and counter productive.
>And what should we do when they eat that teacher?
Stop any future aid and let them starve to death. Possibly colonize a part of the region and extract all natural resources that are laying around. Then leave once the resources run out. Any aggression is countered by expanding the size of the colony.
Don't question it, the Chinese will sort that shit out. Hopefully they will introduce the 1 child policy in their african colonies.
That has, historically, been the best times for any region in Africa (except for Saudi Arabia)
It's kinda pointless to make this a pissing contest of who gave what. Whitey did a lot of bad too. Much of it not even intentionally.
Or perhaps a group of people with poor starting points for running a western-inspired civilisation they have no fundamental ownership of fucked it up? The colour of their skin seems incidental.
Again with the race stuff. Give it a rest already. Not like there aren't people (like you) who hate blacks for no good reason so what's your fucking point?
You can't teach a dog to run your farm. They have an average IQ slightly above smart dogs.
You're right, one white guy isn't immune to a continent full of niggers. That's not the point.
The only aid we should send is no aid
Not even a band aid.
Wow. This is like a fruit within the fruit of knowledge
Nogs are what make Africa poor, you retardo.
Yes, and you are absolutely correct.
However, the principle I stand on is to only help them to help themselves. Once the effort reaches its inevitable conclusion, leave. And never make another attempt again.
>Or perhaps a group of people with poor starting points for running a western-inspired civilisation they have no fundamental ownership of fucked it up? The colour of their skin seems incidental.
There is a short way to say all that, with a catch-all phrase that barrs no missunderstanding
>Niggers
Since the dawn of history the negro has owned the continent of Africa—rich beyond the dream of poet’s fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare black feet. Yet he never picked one up from the dust until a white man showed to him its glittering light. His land swarmed with powerful and docile animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or sled. A hunter by necessity, he never made an axe, spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the moment of its use. He lived as an ox, content to graze for an hour. In a land of stone and timber he never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or built a house save of broken sticks and mud. With league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland seas, for four thousand years he watched their surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him to worlds that lie beyond, and yet he never dreamed a sail! He lived as his fathers lived—stole his food, worked his wife, sold his children, ate his brother, content to drink, sing, dance, and sport as the ape!
--Thomas F. Dixon, Jr., 1905
...
God forbid niggers learn how to irrigate.
How aid prolongs disasters:
>most famines arent caused by draought, theyre caused by warfare and politics
>dump off 5 million tons of free grain and food
>thus prolonging the war, or directly supporting whichever political shitheads are causing the famine
>dump off another 5 million tons of free food
>now imagine trying to make a living as a farmer in a place where free food literally falls out of the sky
>farmers quit farming cuz no money or profit, plus no necessity
>famine starts again
>another 5 million tons of food drop from the sky
Weve created a cycle of dependance and deincentivisation of self reliance. I think NGOs and charity orgs did it on purpose to create a renewable source of perpetual disasters to fuel thier multi-billion dollar donation industry.
Most Africans starve due to laziness. They just want handouts and won't build anything the little bit they do build is mostly blocks of apartments or government provided houses. There is like no employment in the country so people can't work for money like in in western countries and the only people who can really survive are the people who bring foreign money into the country. Foreigners basically sustain the entire South African economy. Living in South Africa is like having a taste of the 1st world but being kept back due to lack of jobs available.
Sounds like circular reasoning to me. We don't know why white people happen to be on top on this cosmically insignificant snapshot of the universe. Reasons like "it's just how it is" isn't very satisfying to a thinking person. Understanding the world in the basest way possible, through the incidental colour of people's skin, is limiting and frankly kinda sad.
Not that I think there's any chance you'd ever contribute to the greater global good, but I don't think this line of thinking is very constructive.
If we had to live among niggers, yes. If we could exterminate the niggers and colonize it with Whites, Africa would be Eden.
>The colour of their skin seems incidental.
I would agree with you, except the color of their skin is also directly linked to an average IQ level that is LITERALLY lower than some primate species.
So with that in mind, yes. Skin color is a good indicator on why Africa is a literal piece of shit. Now go watch the Black Panther trailer again and masturbate to your interracial porn. Loser.
The America one doesn't include Alaska, the biggest state
BIG BLACK CONTINENT
Yes, (((whites))) are on top. Good goy.
...
Actually if you want to do global good, you should not funnel money to the poorest countries, since they will just squander it.
To truly help the entire world, you should pour money to the countries that are at just the edge of poverty, and uplift them first into true economic power.. Then uplift the next down the line from them, and then next and the next.
That way, your aid and manpower will always be boosted by the nations you already uplifted, and since its a lot cheaper and easier to first uplift those on the border of poverty, instead of those most deep into it, it will be best for globe.
Niggers are so below functionality that we should be focusing our resources into them only after uplifting all of latin america, asia, and perhaps the eskimos and native indians as well.
Otherwise we will just squander western wealth, and all the afromentioned will be forced to crawl up on themselves.
FAKE QUOTE ALERT
Does it have blood? I'm not watching anymore capeshit where people get beat up and even shot without spilling anything.
Hey, I'm not about to say I have all the answer and you might even have some good ideas. I just know that the answer has to be more complex than "I'm great and I'm great so uh blacks - or NIGGERS like I usually call them - must be bad".
Regardless of who said it, if you actually read it the quote makes sense retard.
Come spend a year or two in Africa and you might start to get it
Its not even the skin colour, its just that its the most obvious external marker of that people group outside of smell.
If the only visual difference between niggers and scandinavians would have been elf-ears, then by golly we would treat them just the same since they act, think and are exactly as capable as niggers.
What do you mean, I'm retarded and this flew over my head
Once more, strawmanning like a nigger.
Well that settles that.
>Eating the fruit of knowledge casts you out from paradise.
>tfw a post unironically makes you think
Has been a fairly long time since that happened.
>africa
>no resources
???
are you unironically posting this?
Seeing the world for how it is and pointing out stuff like that will get you socially ostracized. You cannot live your comfy normalfag life anymore where you just talk about irrelevant shit all day long and farm likes on social media for virtue signalling. It casts you out of normie-paradise and there is no way you can ever go back.
Merkels big idea to stop African migration is a scam that relies on public ignorance of what stops people migrating. raising their education levels increases desire to emigrate. this is established fact.
other than border control the only thing that will stop them migrating is they, themselves, raising their income levels over generations. the gutmensch west simply cannot transfer enough wealth to do this.
archive.is
I posted no such thing, amigo.
Because it has issues and if I were to visit I'd develop irrational hate of the arbitrary colour of their skin?
No human resources. Its probably more efficient to mine goal in antarctica than deal with the local fauna humanely
>how the fuck don't normies get it?
Because they just blame white people for "colonialism" and that's enough for them.
>irrational
Nothing irrational about noticing the behavioral patterns of groups and forming opinions based on those observations.
Heres some food for thought:
>take population of nigs away from africa
>move them into the most economically and politically powerful nation in human history
>300 years later over 50% of them are still reliant on government aid and welfare to survive
Even africans in the 1st world countries cant take care of themselves.
>It's kinda pointless to make this a pissing contest of who gave what.
It really isn't. Your point was that the only reason Africa is a shithole is because they are missing [list of things]. user pointed out that they were given all of that, and yet it's still a shithole. So clearly that's not the reason.
international charity and welfare is the root of the problem
this
and the fucking normies think that importing sub saharan africans will solve all of western europes problems
because its just due to muh racism
Oh, I figured that, I just thought what he was saying wasn't referring to why the Africans can't do shit, not why we can talk point it out
Not at all. But skin colour is skin deep. The greater truths are more complex and give for more complex questions and answers.
Given a lot of shit they never asked for, that's for sure. When "we" "gave" Africa some of our structures we also denied them a fair chance to build their own.
We might be a couple of hundred years ahead in the west but what's that on the hundred thousand years long human timeline? Nothing.
>When "we" "gave" Africa some of our structures we also denied them a fair chance to build their own.
>We might be a couple of hundred years ahead in the west but what's that on the hundred thousand years long human timeline?
They had millennia to build their own, yet they never did. And when we gave them a boost and brought them up to speed they weren't capable of maintaining it on their own.
Africa, if left alone, will always remain a shithole by Western standards because they on average lack fundamental skills (like impulse control) that are required to run a Western-style society. The only way they would ever catch up with us, and thus shed their jealousy of our wealth, is if Western society was wiped out.
I don't know - I think the fact that you can determine race from a DNA sample means that it is a bit more than a social construct.
This. I spent the last 5 years in over a dozen 3rd world countries. Most projects ive seen are horridly over-priced, poorly managed, and recieve no continuing support once the PR photos for the next round of advertising for the new donation campaign are taken.
>$580,000 water processing facility is built
>swarm of feel good smiling dancing black people photos is taken
>its left behind
>nobody to maintain or operate it, the locals promptly cut it up for scrap metal and go back to drinking out of the same river they shit and toss garbage into
>but the project raised enough support to build 5 more equally unmaintained and unsfaffed projects!!!!!
>because they were oppressed by whitey and were held back
It always comes back to blaming white people.
make no mistake Africa is the garden of eden, they could feed themselves and the world. we have to stop giving them handout so that enough of them die off and the population becomes sustainable, the zionist globalist agenda wont allow that to happen though, instead that is the breading ground of the invading horde of savages.
It's all just strawmanning anyway. No one is saying that niggers are incapable of maintaining a functioning society because they are black. People are saying that niggers are incapable of maintaining a society and that their black skin is an easy indicator to spot niggers.
Retards on the left just like to pretend otherwise because then they can go
>muh causality and correlation
even if that is fundamentally missing what the other side said.
Gaddafi had a plan to do this, one of the reasons they had to kill him.
>But skin colour is skin deep
No shit but skin color is an indication of lineage which can be separated by vast oceans and a differing envirnonment which can call for a differing optimal level of intelligence
Leftist cucks are this fucking stupid that they don't understand evolution and think that racists like me think melanin literally causes low IQ
Use your fucking brain for 5 seconds instead of projecting your own stupidity onto everyone else
I can't believe how small hindoostan is and it has 1.3 billion streetshitter, god that place is disgusting.
i hope you are kidding, because that last statement is absolutely untrue
Maybe a western society isn't what is right for Africa? Maybe they would make something else, possibly better, if given the chance?
There are some beacons of peak western civilisation in the last thousand years, sure. But the overwhelming majority still lived in huts and wherever.
Again with the race. The important thing is that we have a lot more in common than what makes us different from each other - and we all have to live here together anyway. So look up from your microscope and think what you can do to make it better. Clinging to meaningless factoids and half-truths isn't improving anything but your frail ego.
But IQ scores are fairly similar when adjusted for social differences. Even if it was true, and I'm not saying it is, that blacks are on average 5 IQ points below whites - so what? There will still be whites that are dumber than truckloads of blacks and truckloads of blacks are still smarter than you. Going on about race this and that simply isn't productive. What is your point with all this? Genocide? Even if you think that's a good idea we've seen it doesn't work.
So you are implying that libtards are straight up red pilled and want to prevent African niggers from joining the current millennia because once they start making tanks and warships they might conquer the world? So the plan is bury them in bags of grain so they never have to learn anything. Funny thing is it almost sounds reasonable.
>Maybe a western society isn't what is right for Africa?
Well, maybe they should stay in Africa then. That would immediately solve every single problem I ever had with them.
But they don't so I am forced to deal with this shit.
>We might be a couple of hundred years ahead in the west but what's that on the hundred thousand years long human timeline?
Try millennia. Most of them are still in the stone age except white people import AKs and Toyotas so they look like they're people to a casual observer like yourself.
Pretty sure they were staying in Africa when whitey came to colonise.
>Eating the fruit of knowledge casts you out from paradise.
The red pill is often followed by the black pill
>Science is meaningless
>We all HAVE to live together
>You have a frail ego
I'm sorry that reality does not conform to your naive view of world.
Also, have you never seen an IQ test? It measures your skill in pattern recognition, this has shit all to do with social differences. It's a skill you either have or don't.
Yeah, because they didn't have boats and didn't even know about any other country.
If they fundamentally rejected Western society, they'd stay the fuck away. But they don't, they want what we have without the skills to maintain it.
You don't know you can practise for and improve at IQ tests? So much for superior white intellect.
You are putting a lot on them but what about you. Is it so that you have built everything around you? Will it fall apart if you go lazy? Most likely not. You live a blessed life and there's nothing wrong with that. There is however a lot of wrong in blaming others personally for not sharing your privilege.
the elites don't want africa to be self sufficient, they want them weak and starving and needing of help and handouts as part of the globalist agenda to make western nations feel bad like they need to help them, "think of the kids", "they need our help" "white people have so much so give as much as you can" without solving the actual issue, and no one fears them buiding shits or anything like that to conquer the world, that would literally never happen, western nations would simply be able to focus on their own prosperity, they wouldnt need to take any of them in as migrants because they would be developing in their own lands. so westen nations could focus all resources on innovation and property of it's own people. it would undermine the globalist agenda to destroy us and build the new world order from the ashes of our dead civilization, they play us against each other. do you see?
>Maybe a western society isn't what is right for Africa?
It isn't. No one said it was.
>Maybe they would make something else, possibly better, if given the chance?
They had the same amount of time, more even, than Europeans to create their own civilizations. The best the entire continent got was the Egyptians. All of the sub-Saharan's maintained primitive stone age societies until the day whites showed up and are reverting back to them now that the whites have left. They're no more than techno-barbarians at this point.
>The important thing is that we have a lot more in common than what makes us different from each other
Such as? We can breed with them? Other than that they may as well be a different species with how compatible they are with our societies.
>So look up from your microscope and think what you can do to make it better.
Didn't you just tell him not to look at things that were only skin deep? Which is it; should he examine the subject more closely or only at a glance? Be consistent!
>Clinging to meaningless factoids and half-truths
No, that's you. See, "The important thing is that we have a lot more in common than what makes us different from each other,"
>But IQ scores are fairly similar when adjusted for social differences.
>Don't you see, if you (((adjust))) the scores then it's all the same!
Yeah, doesn't work like that idiot.
>Even if it was true
You just implied it was in your previous sentence, just that you have to (((adjust))) the scores for them to be (((accurate))).
>Going on about race this and that simply isn't productive.
Well what do you suggest then, because it's the only consistent variable when comparing the success of whites and blacks on the continent.