...
END OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Camden Murphy
Isaiah Richardson
Fpbp
Juan Ross
Is there actually a possibility that this might happen?
Ayden Hall
BEST DAY OF MY LIFE
AHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA
Elijah Reyes
Most of these are simply not remotely feasible. Too low population, too remote, not enough resources for independence etc.
Would be cool to see the western rooskies split away from their gook and mudslime comrades though.
Eli Ortiz
What you are looking at is a Soros plan to balkanise Russia.
Soros and globalists want to abolish nations and establish statelets that can be easily controlled.
What for same idea around German / Bavarian " independence" moves.
Soros behind Catalonia issue and Royhinga issue and wants partition of Syria.
Brayden Nguyen
Plenty of people on Sup Forums argue for ethnostates and American balkanization and separatist movements in Europe.
Cameron Brooks
Karelia should be given to Finland though. That's at least feasible
Jason Scott
No.
David Lopez
Globalists won't bother balkanizing countries because that's against their agenda. Much easier to take control of Moscow.
Grayson Butler
Soros is just using his charities for massive tax evasion buddy. There's no massive conspiracy aside from avoiding tax.
Alexander Morris
Yes.
Grayson Morgan
>More easily controlled.
This is one of the dumbest things people say. And not remotely true.
David Gutierrez
tectonic shifts in american demographics combined with their astronomical debt, increasing racial tensions and growing rift between coastal and flyover states strongly suggest the country won't make it as a whole to 2050. but it's always easier to project your insecurities on someone else, in this case on russians, the only foreign power with no lobby in u.s. government, and therefore the only group they're officially allowed to hate.
Asher White
Which on keeps all the nukes?
Blake Hall
Give all the nukes to Poland just for shits and giggles
Landon Reed
Jewish republic ofc
Chase Reyes
...
Liam Price
As if Poland would ever come to the aid of Ukrainians tho. Katyn Forest, never forgetti
Robert Rivera
How's that $18 billion Soros shill.
Nice ad hominem...
Lincoln Moore
William Wilson
It's not shilling to point out that your argument is shit.
What happened to Australians on this board. They've gone down of late.
Nathaniel Morgan
Ian Garcia
>Karelia should be given to Finland though
Finland will take it by force
Robert Brown
this
Thomas Hughes
>Needs work
Turn them all red, include Baltics, Scandinavia, US, Ukraine, Caucuses, Syria, and Cuba.
Luke Reyes
Two replies - both ad hominem
= shill.
Justin Jenkins
>ad hominem
I don't think you know what that means
Kevin Nguyen
Shill has not made any intelligent reply to my post
Only called me "dumb"and attempted to "insult" my stereotypical Aussie shitposting proficiency.
Thus.. ..Ad hominem..
= shill.
Colton Moore
Soros "open" borders or no borders
The recent release by DCLeaks of hacked emails from billionaire financier George Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF) paints a picture of a man with little regard for the sovereignty of nations, and a man who actively promotes open borders as a means to manipulate political scenes the world over.
Soros wants the EU to admit at least 300,000 migrants annually and called for allocating at least 30 billion euros a year to the asylum plan.
But what does Soros gain from an open borders plan? Globalists like George Soros..
>View individual nations as commodities to be possessed and directed for their own profit and global aims,
>national sovereignty and firm borders are hindrances they seek to remove.
Soros’ globalist/imperialist motives are exposed in his organizations’ behind-the-scenes activity in Ukraine, where he has sought to manipulate both the EU and the U.S. Federal Reserve to financially prop up the Ukrainian government.
His "Ukrainian Redevelopment Fund" would stand to profit handsomely from a stabilized Ukraine.
But Soros is not a supporter of a sovereign Ukraine, as he has talked of Ukraine being yet another location in which to funnel more refugees from the European migration crisis.
Soros sees Ukraine as merely another game piece best to be used according to how he and his globalist friends see fit.
Ethan Howard
The Shill's posts fit this definition precisely:
Ad hominem, short for argumentum ad hominem, is where an argument is rebutted by attacking the >character,
>motive,
>or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument,
*rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.*
wikipedia.org