White hate thread

>everything good is white
>LOL Italians are Mediterranean niggers
>but romans were white

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/124681316/#124697261
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

...

...

...

...

>Twitter screenshots are now an argument

...

...

I touched a soft spot, it seems

...

...

...

...

...

>actual arguments are given to him
>wyteboi mad ooga booga *unemployed noise*
Remember to sage this thread.
And a reminder to OP: This is not how you make a shil thread. I am quite dissapointed, I expected a better attempt

Winning a war by number is something or honorable according to the counter eugenics commie. No surprise there.

...

>throws identity politics on the basis of race or gender out the window
>adopts identity politics on the basis of income

>memes are now arguments
Do you still think this hive of idiocy is capable of argumentation
cry is free

>>adopts identity politics on the basis of income
You can change class, you can't change race

...

...

There is a difference, I'll give you that.

>hey, you seem to be having financial trouble mate, how about I give you my axe and let you cut down a few trees for me in exchange for a quite generous reward
>no dats unfair you cant do this I wont do dis for you even if you pay me I better starve lol
>k mate can I have the axe back
>u wot m8
It's ok if you don't want to do a specific thing for someone else, but stealing the means of production from him (means of production he, unlike you, worked hard for) is absolute savagery. if you claim you wuz workerz n sheeit, then produce means of production

>mommy there is a 100 feet tall dragon under my bed, I saw him
>dragons don't exist. Besides, a 100 feet creature cannot fid under a child's bed
>BUT MOMMY I SAW IT

Fuck off you communist faggot.
t. Italian

>namefag
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/124681316/#124697261

You're faggot who posted that reply, right?
I'm 100% sure you're hide stars and stripes behind that hammer and sickle.

>but stealing the means of production from him (means of production he, unlike you, worked hard for) is absolute savagery
You don't steal the means of production, you just keep the product of your labour despite who keeps the capital. In your example, you get to keep your axe, but your hired lumberjack will keep the trees he cut down. Think of it as me writing my homework with your pen

But the axe will wear out, so he should at least get some compensation for his lending of the axe, shouldn't he?

>admits they're not correct on Sup Forums
user, I now hold you on a higher pedestal than everyone on this board
I don't quite copy that
Fuck off you crusade-larping faggot
t. someone whose country can take care of its debt
>You're faggot
back2schule dreckskind

In a socialist society, you as an owner of means of production can use whatever profit to repair capital

>communist lecturing anyone on economics
kek

Not an argument. Also, what is LTV?

romans were actually whiter in the past then they are now

what's going on over here?
somebody hating on a website started up by a white man?
On an internet created by white people?
In a country created by white people?
With a language created by white people?
and yet again
>Sup Forums is a hivemind

to be honest, that sounds like an anarcho capitalist argument. In a communist society the means of production would be a common good of the people, private ownership of means of production wouldn't exist as I understand it.

So let's take this example.
Person A has an axe, Person B uses the axe to chop wood. Should the axe be common propperty, thus person B has to give/pay nothing?
Or should person B give up a part of his own profit and return the axe to person A?
Or should person A chop his own wood to repair his axe and let person B use the axe for free?
I'm not sure what you meant there.

>Person A has an axe, Person B uses the axe to chop wood. Should the axe be common propperty, thus person B has to give/pay nothing?
No, profit is first used for the MOP, then distributed among the members of the collective
>Or should person B give up a part of his own profit and return the axe to person A?
Depends on whose product of labour was larger
>Or should person A chop his own wood to repair his axe and let person B use the axe for free?
Nope, the cost of maintenance of capital is paid from the overall profit and deducted proportionally from everyone's product of labour

>seize the means of production
I specifically thought your post was encouraging this.
About your argument - it is okay if someone(not you tho) wanted to write his homework with my pen. however if we made an agreement beforehand that he will then help me with this exact homework and he doesn't - that's not acceptable, he broke his promise. If you have agreed to work under unacceptable for you conditions, then it's your fucking problem.

I have an idea for a Tyrone comic but I can't draw and shieeeeet.

Tyrone is praying to his food stamps, asks the government god to see his dad while he is crying praying, *poof* transported to jail and they hug behind bars. ............. sheeeeeeeeit

wot
can you describe what you want please
like in panel 1 tyrone sayin wyte womynz panel two gibsmedat then straight to panel 10 because niggers can't count and sheeeeeeeeit gnomesayin
just describe your request more verbosely blease
.
also sage commie threads

>dreckskind
Wasn't that how Stalin called his own son?
Because he treated him like dirt.

>be Stalin
>abandon your only son when he was a baby like a nigger
>son grows up and joins the red army
>Nazis capture him and send him to a concretation camp
>what does Stalin do? He calls his own son a faggot for not killing himself

Nice rolemodel you have there.

Does it look like the Kikes have any problems with Arab countries at all?

They were literally attacked by the entire Arab world and won. Easily.

Arabs are mutated, inbred dogmen. Incapable of anywhere near the social cohesion to take on a first world country or even a parasite kike nation supported by them.

Muslims can be easily ruled through superstition and brute force.

I don't see how that is different from the general concept of money though (if you include taxation). The only difference would be that in a socialist society, (local) government gets to decide who gets what, whereas, with money in a capitalist society, you are responsible for your own income entirely.
Besides, you assume a pure, incorruptible nature of those that decide who gets what, which is almost definitely unrealistic. In reality, it creates exactly the same dynamic between a 'rich capitalist' and a 'worker', but the power lies entirely with those in power under a different name.

>If you have agreed to work under unacceptable for you conditions, then it's your fucking problem.
This problem is dealt with national firms that operate under socialist mode of production and will be impossible to compete with in the labour market. If someone under a socialist society makes such a deal, too bad for him, unless the socialist society makes a law that every worker has the right to the product of their labour, in which case such a deal would be illegal

Scary

>Muslims can be easily ruled through superstition and brute force
Is that why according to your contrived viewpoint the Whites have been subjugated by the Jews while the Muslims still preach hate and want to fucking nuke them if they had the chance?
>I don't see how that is different from the general concept of money though (if you include taxation)
Depends. Socialism itself can exist in a market society, which is what I want it to exist in. Ask those questions to Marxists
>Nice rolemodel you have there
TIL a state capitalist who murdered gay people is my rolemodel

Spot on

To be honest, I don't mind social democracy either, as long as it doesn't get out of hand. I just don't trust a government to spend my money as efficiently as possible.

>Jewish atheist
what? Can i be muslim christian if i want to?

Nice try our Hebrew friend. Wanting a white culture is not the same as the push towards communism you stupid pig fucker.

Tyrone comics are literally copy and pasting in photoshop you absolute faggot.

The whole "Italians aren't white but Romans were blonde haired and blue eyed!" are the views of Sup Forums and not white people as a whole.

Sup Forums are just right wing SJWs, they're as equally deluded and ignorant.

If only you knew the way things are going.

No one thinks Romans were white. The original ones were, then they let too many shit skins in and eventually they ruined everything

'Jewish' can refer to either an ethnicity and a religion. A lot of younger, modern day western Jews have no religion.

t. secular Jew raised by staunch atheists.

Romans (or Latins, assuming you're referring to the ethnicity of citizens of Rome) were white. And the "shitskins" they let in that you speak of were actually cracka ass northern Europeans.

*throws a tantrum in response*

...

>"uhm, no" is your sole argument in favor of socialism.
Brilliant.

At one point in history, all of man were the same. Not until the gods came down and destroyed these people, scattering them, confusing their language so that they may never be one again.

ancient Mesopotamians were white
ancient Vinca people were white
ancient Egyptians were white
ancient Persians were white
ancient Minoans were white
ancient Greeks were white
ancient Etruscans were white
ancient Romans were white
ancient Iberians were white
ancient Chinese were white
ancient Indus were white
ancient Japanese were white
ancient Mesoamericans were white
ancient east Africans were white
ancient Bantus were white
ancient Abbos were white

Ancient Romans and Greeks were Nordic

Did you notice that most of these are women?

ancient women were white