what gets me is how did this happen? apparently he was able to get some sort of lending monoply but why would the English give a Jew a monopoly on lending allowing him to become richer than the king? why wouldnt an Englishman be given that monopoly?
can someone redpill me on how Jews got this super lucrative monopoly on lending allowing them to amass huge amounts of wealth and become super powerful? thanks
She's my favorite, can we still watch her play video games? It's that still a thing?
Lucas Ramirez
usury was prohibited for the christians by a direct pappale bauble (from the concile of Nicée if i member?), so jews used this to their advantages and laundered money to kings and lords to make their endless wars, most of the time financing the both parties in conflict.
Christopher Wilson
but im told Christianity has been a tool against the Jews. how can that be true if it made a Jew richer than the King?
Aiden Barnes
>usury was prohibited for the christians by a direct pappale bauble (from the concile of Nicée if i member?), so jews used this to their advantages and laundered money to kings and lords to make their endless wars, most of the time financing the both parties in conflict.
This is how I understand it.
Now, is there a link between Aaron of Lincoln and Rothschild?
Lincoln Reed
MARY MOTHER OF CHRIST WHO IS THIS?
Christopher Cook
I thought she's never taken a dick on cam before?
Cameron Parker
>but im told Christianity has been a tool against the Jews. how can that be true if it made a Jew richer than the King?
you have to read Nieztche to understand this, christianity is the safe hating cuckism by definition, only the poors can access the paradise while its almost impossible for the riches. Christianity have been a perfect tool for keeping the white man ashamed and enslaved to his jewish master, who isn't bothered by such principles.
probably not, the meyer dinasty was pretty irrelevant pre XIXth c.
Mason Williams
"Upon his death Henry II seized his property as the escheat of a Jewish usurer, and the English crown thus became universal heir to his estate."
Can we have these laws now, the US government taking money "oh, its the escheat of a Jewish usurer"?
We wouldn't have Rothschild if we had that policy.
Zachary Torres
self-hating*
Kayden White
it was pretty common during the middle age to pogrom the jews laundering sums of moneys you weren't able to pay back, this way you make 2 birds with 1 stone : you erase the debt and you exterminate the vermine
Jacob Morris
There is no such thing as a white jew
James Foster
Christianity is a tool created by the Jews to preach cuckery to Israel.
Lincoln Lopez
Christians were not allowed to lend money at interest back then. Monarchs gave out monopolies to powerful merchants in exchange for political support all the time in the middle ages. So I guess the king gave a monopoly to the only person he knew who was allowed to lend money by their religion.
Ethan Ward
A lot of people were richer than the King. Fuedalisim doesn't run on "who's the richest"
Evan Smith
Christianity.
It was utilized as a weapon by a cunning emperor who finally found a way to effectively invade the places his armies could not hold.
And due to the usury requirements that forbade gentiles from engaging in lending for a profit, jew banks became powerful and jews became necessary fixtures in every European society that submitted to their religion.
Nathan Howard
I agree with you there. It's easy for a poor white straight male to go to Heaven. We're the most persecuted people on the planet.
Kayden Garcia
bump
Leo Wood
>richer than the king Not always hard in 12th century Europe. Kings are not always very good with their money. > lending monoply but why would the English give a Jew a monopoly Christianity has historically not looked kindly on money lending specifically the charging of interest on loans. The Wikipedia article doesn't mention a monopoly but it wouldn't surprise me that a practice normally considered harmful would be assigned to an "outsider" with only one individual allowed to operate such a business.
>on how Jews got this super lucrative monopoly on lending allowing them to amass huge amounts of wealth and become super powerful?
Maybe you should try reading the article more closely. >Upon his death Henry II seized his property as the escheat of a Jewish usurer, and the English crown thus became universal heir to his estate. Aaron of Lincoln and his family never got to keep the money and power. When Aaron died Henry II seized his wealth including the outstanding debts (some of which his own) but as a Christian king he could no longer accept interest on them.
both Aaron of Lincoln and Rothschild were listed here as Court Jew.
Lincoln Johnson
>DEBTS
Nicholas Ross
Seems like that whole "escheat" thing is something we should look at more closely for today.
Banking has always been suspect.
Angel Taylor
>posting monroe
I love this bitch
Isaiah Hall
>white jew
Carson Bailey
is that monroe?
Jonathan Parker
Jews aren't technically allowed to lend at interest to fellow jews so exploitation of gentiles through usury and/or speculation was necessary for their survival