Prove that welfare and Hip Hop culture created by Jews aren't the main cause of Black inferiority in America.
>inb4 first page Google search image of IQ distribution worldwide
Why can't there be one humanity under Liberty, rule of law, and the power of the Holy Spirit guiding and advocating for us all.
Other urls found in this thread:
presidency.ucsb.edu
twitter.com
>Why can't there be one humanity
becouse diversity is our strenght...
+ i don't think haiti have much welfare/hip hop/jews so you are wrong
They're using the same conditioning mechanisms to curtail white people now too.
So I can't disprove it.
its all so tiresome
Haiti's entire economy is in a stranglehold by the Clinton family and have been assblasted by natural disaster after another. (((hurricane Matthew))) being one created by weather manipulation to keep that shithole under Clinton's iron fist.
I'm saying we can elevate inferior races through God and liberty, our main problem with blacks is singlemotherhood. If they lack a biological father, they are no less worthy of our common heavenly father
Because many people on Sup Forums follow the Americanized/racist version of Christianity.
Then they're Satanists not Christian
>inb4
Is not a rebuttal, just want to throw that out there.
The answer is that people are different and have different values, some of which are mutually exclusive under one government. One-size-fits-all governance is totalitarian. The founding fathers were ethnonationalists. Take off your freedom flag please.
i agree
>The Founding Fathers were ethnonationalist
>Out of context quotes
Really convincing there!
I'm not for Mixing race or culture, I believe White Protestant enlightenment is the greatest thought we've been able to create as a species, and want to extend that to all people so we can move forward in this God-forsaken shithole of a mess.
What additional context changes the meaning of each of those lengthy and self-contained assertions about national homogeneity? If you're not for mixing cultures, are you for simply destroying all cultures unlike your own? Honestly, the UN flag would suit you better if you're going to come here and push global governance.
Acceptance in respect to how you say your prayers;
to one from whence we came who has no name.
As branching factions fractal in symbology -
A oneness which breaks unity from roots which claim we’re all the same.
"If every opposition
carries within it
the seeds of agreement,"
then,
"...the brighter your virtue, the higher you'll rise."
"I will enlarge no more on the evidence, but submit it to you, gentlemen—Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence: nor is the law less stable than the fact. If an assault was made to endanger their lives, the law is clear, they had right kill in their own defence.", John Adams on the Boston Massacre.
I can keep going if you want, practically all of these are completely unrelated to Racial differences. You're just obsessed with assuring your frail and pathetic worldview.
I would like to reiterate, since you ignored the rest of my post, that people are still different from each other and have mutually exclusive values, and that one-size-fits-all governance is still totalitarian.
I would like you to keep going. I knew you'd start and stop with Adams, whose quote was by far most ambiguous.
I agree people are different from eachother and don't hold the same values; and I never advocated a universal government. In fact I advocate the exact opposite - a limited government that protects Locke's Natural Rights as practically its only function.
I want freedom and a government that's willing to protect; and make no mistake I'm full aware that freedom may one day need to be protected with my own blood or that of my sons.
I'm willing to bleed for freedom around the world, but such freedom isn't here in my country because of spineless dogs in the government counting on races being divided without religion and no value system to help them organize against tyranny.
We're all under attack by parasites who want us enslaved under global socialism.
While we're at it: what's the nonracial context for the naturalization act of 1790?
" It is by a thorough knowledge of the whole subject that our fellow-citizens are enabled to judge correctly of the past and to give a proper direction to the future."
Completely out of context, Monroe's inaugural address on 1821:
presidency.ucsb.edu
Why are you so blatantly ignorant of History? Did you fail your High School history class and you're trying to frantically make up for it by lying about the foundation of your country? Grow a spine you worthless dog
americanism is the heresy which accepts other religions and do not want to convert them
>racism
define it, if it means to acknowledge the differences then yes you OUGHT to be racist, if it means hating other races, well blacks commit 50% of the crime in America, while being the 13% of the population, 80% of black fathers leave their family when it turns out that the woman is pregnant and in average they have much less IQ, well the question is is this blind hatred or justified
>protestantist "enlightenment"
you mean heresy which you like
The hatred toward blacks is justified in my opinion -- I argue hatred toward the sinful generation is not mine to behold. I think they're suffering for their sins in this life and will do so in the next; I pray for their repentance and prosecute them for their crimes.
Btw Juan, I can quote Founding fathers too.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "
What about understanding scripture thoroughly rather than mindlessly repeating the same 3 prayers is heresy.
Keep going. I really want to see you detribalize Jefferson's, Franklin's, Madison's, Dickinson's, Hamilton's and Jay's remarks. We can well infer where Washington stood with the passage of the already-mentioned naturalization law.
It's admirable to be willing to bleed, but the other side of that statement is that you're willing to spill blood to democratize parts of the world that have nothing to do with you. When given democracy at gunpoint, MENA peoples use the democratic process to install caliphates.
I don't want democracy at gunpoint, I want sovereignty without Tyranny. We're told not to resist from evil in the New Testament, so it is our duty to protect those under tyranny. When done so without the influence of Global Jihad and the democratic establishment, we liberate countries from Tyranny
What, like faith alone?
>(Matthew 7:21) “Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of the heavens, but the one doing the will of my Father who is in the heavens will.
>(James 2:14-17) "What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him? If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that? So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead."
>(James 2:26) "For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so also faith apart from works is dead."
>(Matthew 5:16) "In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven."
>(John 14:15) "If you love me, you will keep my commandments."
>(1 Corinthians 6:9-10) "Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."
You are joking, right even the Bible tells us that we need tradition too.
You need a balance; I practice a lot of the Liturgy from the Catholic tradition myself - but I don't pretend to be saved because of my Churchgoing, like 70% of the cultural catholics.
I think the relation to God is complex and cannot be boiled down to Dogmatism - although it had been effective in the Evangelization of Europe (Which by the way they were quick to abandon at the slightest nudge toward Marxism and Secularist Materialism).
I am also in favor of sovereignty without tyranny. To that end, I want each distinct people to have a government reflective of its character and values. How can a government have the consent of the governed when governing different peoples with different interests? Why do you take this disagreement so personally? Why sling insults? Could it be that you're not here to argue in good faith?
So God tells the one that and then He tells someone something else? Because this is what protestantism is.
>I think the relation to God is complex and cannot be boiled down to Dogmatism
"You think", this is most protestant keyword, "God is the way I'd like it to be", no, if you look at early christians and the Bible, the Church does not contradict any of that (well Rome has commited an apostasy(Vatican II), which was prophesied)
I take it personally because weasels like you poison our youth toward being Hitler loving NEETs without direction or true values. Your Ethno nationlist fad identity is garbage and I don't respect it -- especially when you lie about the founders of the U.S.
That's fair
>I practice a lot of the Liturgy from the Catholic
Show's over. Mystery solved. Your misguided universalism and misunderstanding of our country's origins make sense now. So much for believing in the supremacy of White Protestant Enlightenment thought.
Oh really? Because Lutheranism, Methodism, Anglicanism, Episcopalianism, etc do NOT practice similar liturgy to the Catholic Church?
How out of touch are you?
I do not advocate national socialism in America. Americans do not accept authority to a degree that would allow it or make it advisable. This may come as a shock, but Hitler wasn't the only head of state who ever understood the importance of tribal interests.
As soon as we established a welfare state we doomed our Mentally ill and allowed Globalist Socialists to manipulate Godless folk, hispanics and blacks to be enamoured; to idolize the Socialists as martyrs.
Once you take away freedom it's difficult to take back.
Stop that, Vatican II was the council that promoted the protestant mass, it is heresy, pointed out by the council of trent
"Sola fide" justification and rejection of Papal authority are not minor details. Millions have died over these distinctions.
I agree, that's why I'm Protestant. And why we have Pastors rather than priests or bishops.
loli isn't shocking.
You act like blacks were model citizens before those things happened. They weren't, they were just better than they are now i.e. overrepresented in homicide rates at a 3:1 ratio rather than a 10+:1 ratio.
>I don't want democracy at gunpoint, I want sovereignty without Tyranny. We're told not to resist from evil in the New Testament, so it is our duty to protect those under tyranny.
I'm not saying they were, I'm saying they have the potential to become so if they weren't handed free money at every turn to do absolutely nothing. I don't believe this is a particularly difficult idea to grasp and is quite reasonable -- mostly justified on religious grounds mind you.
Cut the trappings of Popery out of your worship then. No wonder you come here extolling an Ellis Island foundation myth of our country.
>trappings of Popery out of your worship
Force religious tradition out of millions of Protestant Churches? Tough luck. We worship God and act in remembrance of Christ's sacrifice by doing certain things; it doesn't mean 9 out of 10 Protestant churches worship the pope you dumb sack of shit.
Why give a shit about their potential when that same potential is more easily realized by more similar people who don't pose an existential criminal threat to my family? Lifting up intransigent savages costs resources that could be better spent elsewhere. If you abolished welfare (against all odds thanks to our multicultural democracy), the already abysmal crime rate would explode and we'd have to put down black and brown looters by the thousands just to uphold public order. If you're willing to bear the violent consequences of such an act, I guess you're at least internally consistent, but the incident would be sensationalized and spun as genocide regardless of your intent.
I am certainly for the abolishment of the welfare state and more than willing to increase policing to ensure safety in black/hispanic neighborhoods -- thats what police are there to do.
If them having to work for a living is such a fucking pain that they attack innocent people, they deserve to rot in prison.
I won't back down from that position. I want people to win and thrive, and I want shit people to rot and perish
Why do you want one humanity?
If you care about the white race, then the more barriers, religious and cultural differences, between whites and non-whites, the better.
Then we're on more similar ground than you think. For my part, I don't want to live around people who pose an outsized threat of violence to my children. Would you meet wary ethnonationalists halfway at relegalizing private discrimination (free association, a natural right for all people) and retaining prohibition of public sector discrimination against citizens? This would require a partial repeal of the civil rights act, but the act gave government undue influence in private relationships to begin with.
Of course!
I want as many people as possible to value liberty and God.
I care about culture and people on an individual basis -- I reject the categorization of individuals by identity(pretending people are just a part of a mass). I care about ideas and the Spirit.
What good is it to forfeit your soul in order to push for the ethno nationalist agenda?