Alive Nintendo franchises:
>Mario
>Infinite Mario spinoffs
>Zelda
>Splatoon
>Fire Emblem
>Kirby
>Animal Crossing
Aethereal Franchises:
>Pikmin
Dead Nintendo Franchises:
>F-Zero
>Metroid
>Kid Icarus
>Golden Sun
>Wario Ware
>Star Fox
>Sin and Punishment
>Custom Robo
>Punch-Out
>Donkey Kong
>Nintendo Wars
>Mother
Do you think Nintendo even understands why they're hemorrhaging money?
1. You are missing a lot of franchises
2. They aren't hemorragig money
3. Most of those franchises died because they don't sell well
>1. You are missing a lot of franchises
Name them.
Do your homework goy (hint: You are missing more franchises than your three lists put together)
So you literally can't name them?
Xenoblade you fucking faggot
Donkey Kong?
One whole franchise with 2 games and a third that won't be out for at least a year, damn that's a lot that I'm missing.
dont forget to add advance wars and the spin off paper mario to dead.
Nothing in the dead franchise tier stands to make them any money excluding Donkey Kong. Which isn't even dead.
star fox and donkey kong aren't dead
they'll most likely move some to mobile, like wariware
Well, Star Fox is kinda dead, but not DK.
Star Fox and Donkey Kong are never getting another game, sad but true.
Mole Mania
Takamaru
Xenoblade
Journey West
For whom the frog bell tolls
Smash Bros
Pokemon
Excite Bike
You faggot.
>tfw this game came out 3 years ago
you could consider arms to be a kind of successor to punch out. I wouldn't call it "dead"
>Smash Bros
Not a franchise
>Pokémon
Not owned by Nintendo, check your facts
The rest are dead series that prove my point.
Then please explain why Splatoon is listed?
Are you actually retarded?
>Metroid and Star Dead
New games released a few months ago
Splatoon's had two games in 2 years, Xenoblade has barely scraped 2 in 5.
Nintendo owns Game Freak
Smash Bros is a franchise.
You faggot cuck.
How the fuck is Xenoblade a dead series when it has another game coming out this year?
>one or two bad games means the franchise is dead
kill yourselves retards
>Not owned by Nintendo
Nintendo doesn't MAKE Pokemon. They own Game Freak which does.
>Nintendo owns Game Freak
Again, check your facts
>Actually thinking Xenoblade will come out in 2018, let alone this year
Thats because Splatoon is a shitty mini game and Xenoblade is a 60-80 hour RPG .
Where's the Rhythm Heaven series?
They own a Part of Game Freak, so yes, they do.
I own a part of Nintendo (Share holder), does that mean that all their games are mine?
The reality is, Nintendos more safe making new ips than reviving old ones
Also the Pokemon company was established by Nintendo, which also owns Pokemon.
This. People still don't know this?!?
Nintendo only makes so many games on their own. Many of their franchises are maintained by second parties.
Besides, you can't say GF makes Pokemon and that's why you didn't list it, but then you go and list shit like Kirby and Fire Emblem.
>custom robo
please don't remind me. hurts so much.
Just a few:
Mach Rider
Wave Race
1080º Snowboarding
The Legend of Starfy
Odama
Eternal Darkness
Doshin the Giant
Geist
Excite Bike
Pillotwings
Chibi Robot
The Mysterious Murasame Castle
Startropics
Baten Kaitos
Cubivore
codename STEAM
Fatal Frame
Fossil Fighters
Dillon's Rolling Western
Glory of Heracles
Harmoknight
Ice Climbers
Joy Mech Fight
Elite Beat Agents
Sakura Samurai
Stunt Racer
The Last Story
Pandora's Tower
The Wonderful 101
Trace Memory
Virtua Fighter
Urban Champion
Zangeki no Reginleiv
Steel Driver
Endless Ocean
Lost Kingdoms
Kuru Kuru Kururin
Drill Dozer
Ballon Fight
For Frog the Bell Tolls
No they own a minority share (20%) you own .5% at maximun
>Star Fox
Miyamoto already said he will keep making Star Fox games until the series is famous again
Literally all dead franchises, thanks for helping my point!
Also
>Fatal Frame
No.
Don't underestimate the power of a crappy sequel. Sometimes a game or two can be so crappy that it leaves a bad taste in people's mouth and ruins a franchise completely.
You honestly believe a word out of that man's mouth anymore?
never heard of them, stop making them up
>No
They brought it
>helping my point
How? You don't even have a point.
You just listed a bunch of dead franchises that aren't really that profitable
>You just listed a bunch of dead franchises that aren't really that profitable
Please provide your proof that those series all lost money
You are the one that is trying to imply that reviving them would be lucrative.
It's up to you, buddy
>>Custom Robo
>>Punch-Out
they combined and now we have ARMS
Someone pointed out that that wasn't the complete list of Nintendo IPs. When did someone say reviving them. Fucking stupid sony cucks.
No, you made the assertion that they were not profitable, the onus is on you to prove it, somehow I don't think you can.
>Kid Icarus
Don't remind me
>Sup Forums ignores this
Good job
>expecting nu-Sup Forums to know, let alone care about these
Top kek
>Harmoknight
love that game, fuckin love it
No one gives a shit what Nintendo considers "safe" when they just unveiled the disgusting chimera that is the Switch
>WAGGLE
>TOUCH SCREEN
>PLAY OFF THE TV
They don't understand what "safe" is when everyone knows they only had to make a standard console with off-tv play and that was it.
>alive
>no pokemon
>pokemon's game freak not nintendo
>list fucking fire emblem and Kirby as nintendo ips
You're special, aren't you? Got a nice shiny helmet on your head?
Please show me all those Kirby and FE mobile games.
>b-but they announced one for mobile!
Yeah don't see it, sorry.
>Just a few:
>a few
>few
Is there any company with more vidya IPs than Nintendo?
HAL made Kirby
There for Kirby isn't Nintendo.
Your fucking logic is flawless.
Not seeing that Kirby game not on a Nintendo platform, bud
You may not know this, but Pokemon exists because Miyamoto helped promote it at Nintendo. Game Freak even made a Yoshi game to raise money for it. And get this, Pokemon's from the 90s, 1995! On the original gameboy! You may be too young to remember it though.
and yet, it has multiple games available on mobile which aren't published by Nintendo
>Actually thinking that DK's franchise is dead
>Pokemon
>been on the Nintendo GameBoy since 1995 with Pocket Monsters Red and Pocket Monster Green
>IT'S NOT A NINTENDO CONSOLE
You mean chinese bootlegs, and Pokemon Go? Wow. So that means, thanks to bootlegs, Mario's not Nintendo either!
Fucking logic.
...
>Last game in series was 3 years ago
>Guaranteed no chance of any kind of sequel until 2018
It's dead.
Pokémon Go, Pokémon Shuffle and the Pokedex 3D are all available on mobile phones are not published by Nintendo
>multiple
>all licensed Pokemon games have been on Nintendo consoles and hand helds until Pokemon Go.
Mario must not be Nintendo anymore, since Mario Run.
See
Mario Run was published by Nintendo, not sure why this is so hard for your tiny minds to comprehend?
>Dead Nintendo Franchises:
>Donkey Kong
Maybe, but Donkey Kong Country is alive and well.
Also throw Smash Bros into dead category.
Oh boy.
Mario's finally third party. He has a mobile game now too!
isn't Virtua Fighter a Sega IP?
See
I'm not really sure what your tiny minds struggle with
Nintendo published Pokemon Go, you fucking sperg lord. Even promoted it. And licensing on it list Nintendo right there in the fucking credits.
>tfw pikmin is miyamoto's pet series so it will never die as long as he doesn't
live forever shiggy
play.google.com
So where does it say Nintendo on this page?
just a reminder, CoD players aren't real hardcore gamers
ign.com
The fact it's using Pokemon is a big clue Nintendo's involvement. Faggot.
Once again, Pokémon is not owned by Nintendo.
en.wikipedia.org
>Creators
>Satoshi
>NINTENDO
>Published by
>GameFreak
>Pokemon Company
>NINTENDO
>Pokemon Company
>Owned and made by Nintendo
>GameFreak
>Half owned by Nintendo
You're one of those faggots who thinks King K. Rool is owned by Microsoft, right?
and yet there are multiple Pokémon mobile games not published by Nintendo, I'm not sure what you thought you were proving?
They get permission from Nintendo to do it.
Nintendo has to give them permission.
Due to copyrights and law.
Nintendo gives them permission.
You cock goblin.
Holy shit you're fucking dumb.
>Mario
>Mario kart
>Zelda
>Metroid
>Xenoblade
The end. 30 years and xeno has been added to my list.
A few of those are 3rd party IPs.
Hmm I'm enjoying all that proof you just posted. Oh wait you don't seem to have posted any.
HOLY. FUCK.
IT EVEN SAYS ON THE POKEMON GO PAGE
"In September 2015, it was announced that Niantic was developing Pokémon Go in partnership with Nintendo and The Pokémon Company for iOS and Android devices"
NINTENDO IS RIGHT THERE. IT'S NOT A THIRD PARTY YOU FUCKING MORON.
>tfw this game came out 3 years ago
I still remember the time when games coming each 4 or 5 was normal. Now all fags think is normal to have a yearly sequel to each AAA game.
Wow that's great! Shame they didn't publish it and there name literally isn't anywhere in the game!
It says Nintendo when they show the licensing and credits, you fucking FAGGOT.
>"Franchises" with 1 game
You don't know what the word means
Not even him but just give it up you sound like a fuck
CoD kids are the pre-Wii casuals with a different name.
Right. Sorry.
Just replace it with Adventures of Lolo
Or maybe Duck Hunt
Or even with Nintendouji
Or would you like some Soma Bringer?
Oh so glad you provided a screenshot as proof.
See that TM next to Pokemon? That means trade mark.
Trade mark means it's owned by something, or else the person who trade marked it would sue.
Guess what Pokemon's trademarked under? Nintendo/Pokemon Company/Creatures Inc.
Go look it up dumbass
>pokemon is owned by gamefreak, creature inc and nintendo
>pokemon company is made to manage all lisencing/marketing
>Pokemon Company is formed by gamefreak, Creature inc and Nintendo.
>nintendo owns a big part of gamefreak and creature inc
>pokemon is not owned by nintendo
kys
I really hope for a Kid Icarus Uprising port to Switch and a good new Metroid. The thing that gives me hope is that, even though the Switch presentation was a little light on games, they're probably saving some big announcements for E3, r-right?
Name 10 (ten) such franchises
Well gee.
They'res Miyamoto and the Pokemon owner. And the Pokemon Go dev. Each of them have a PokeBall, a license by Nintendo item. Oh man, Pokemon isn't owned by Nintendo.
So you have no proof?
Wow, it's not like anyone can stand next to those guys holding those items or anything...
>Pokemon is not owned by nintendo
I hope you realize that gamefreak or the pokemon company cant do a pokemon related game without nintendo approval. Yeah, they own the final word about the whole franchise because they own the name.
Nintendo owns Pokemon you fucking sperm guzzling faggot. Stop acting retarded. Even the fucking Anime says Nintendo owns them.
Ah yes and I expect you also have the proof to go with that statement?
>Still no proof
I mean if it's true it should be easy to find proof, right?
Also nice insults, you should maybe consider some anger management lessons if you're getting angry at people on the internet.