How is this not a fucking crime?

How is this not a fucking crime?

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/Sony_v_Bleem.htm
ap.nintendo.com/report/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

what laws are they breaking?

/thread

It's easy work when a developer sold them the kit info.

>emulation
>crime

should we go to court so you can lose again?

I bet you think 3rd party and devices that play dvds are illegal too.

this meme needs to stop

its for research m8

the only crime committed here is your jealousy

Its ok to pirate Nintendo's shit.

There's already a legal precedence on emulation.

I agree, CEmu shit posting should be illegal.

emulators yes
roms are still illegal from what i understand

though i dont know what they thought was gonna happen when they released a sub par 300 dollar machine that is probably gonna have ONLY the 1 game worth getting on it

ROMs are legal, with the stipulation that you're copying them yourself as a backup in case the disc fails.

Obviously it's hard to prove that you didn't do that, and nobody's ever been successfully prosecuted for anything involving ROM files anyway.

dissu, leddit get out

i thought there was a new stipulation addressing that in most EULAs that states you cant make an archive or backup copy

>tfw they're making 3 million a month on an illegal emulator
>Sup Forums alouds it

Not him, but I sure hope not. And if that's the case, all the more reason to torrent things.

law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/Sony_v_Bleem.htm

ENGLISH

COMMON

LAW

>you will be a ble to play Bayonetta 1 on pc through this
>this is a bad thing

You're mixing up cause and effect

EULAs usually don't hold up in court, and woe to the company that wants to see if it would just to get some ROM files off the internet.

You're full of shit

I dont think it is. But hey, can you blame them? I would squeeze money from retards too, I would probably do it in my free time even. Closed source emulation is a goldmine nowadays it seems.

Those two dudes at CEMU must be su fucking happy lmao.

THEY CAN'T KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

>calls out shills
>you're just full of shit
Nice one CEMU dev

fpbp. Despite Nintendo's autistic crying, emulation is not a crime, and roms are completely legal if you own an original copy.

>they make a console emulator that can be ported across PCs, backups can be made, mods can be added(?) and this is somehow a bad thing.
tell me, are you a shill for a certain company or are you just shitposting?

Because it's illegal you shitlord.

How long do you guys think it will take before greed and pride makes this whole thing fall part?

>I don't know what Common Law is

>he thinks Sup Forums pays for videogames much less emulators

go back to l eddit

show me the law f aggot

The development of emulators is not illegal, it has been upheld in court and is also evidenced by the number of emulators that currently exist and have existed for many years. Fuck off, you goddamn shitposter.

>$25,463 per month
>$3million

???

Emulation is fine, Dolphin is a legit emulator build from the ground up. CEMU is blatantly made with propriety code that the devs shouldn't have access to.

>Look mom I got a C in high school Legal Studies

kek empire ended faggot, you cant even successfully apply your own laws within your island

i do remember reading the stipulation but your right that no company would really push for its application. especially when the first week of release is when a company makes 90 percent of its profit on a release and it usually takes a week for a crack/rom to pop up and longer for it to work

>we will finally be able to play the best version of Mass Effect 3 at 4k
Finally.

Because emulation technically falls under preservation of information instead of piracy. If you can legally source the roms then it's completely legal as far as i know

Better than failing it unlike you since you don't even know what it is

How me the law that says its illegal. Oh right, you can't. Because it doesn't exist.

How is this not a fucking crime?

considering they're optimizing illegal copies of BOTW? im aware that emulators arent illegal, but arent isos? they're distributing them to patreons

They're using stolen source code

Whom are you quoting?

They didn't use any s*ny code

Literally every time this comes up not one of you has been able to provide a fucking SHRED of evidence that CEMU uses stolen or "proprietary" code.

Either provide hard evidence that there is stolen code or shut your fucking mouth.

prove it

It's not like Sony took the developers to court or anything.

>They're using stolen source code

stolen=/=reverse engineered and i=even if its not you cant prove that they didn't reverse engineer it.

Bleem used as much of Sony's code as CEMU uses Nintendo's code.

>it's not you cant prove they didn't
Neither could I prove the US spies on you until Snowden came out of the closet but still everyone knew it happened.

It's not like Sony lost in court on all counts or anything.

I've owned my Wii U since a year after its launch and owned half my library physically before I caught wind of homebrew. Honestly I'm glad I have the console and its possible to homebrew it instead because I hate all the trouble I went through with game-cube and PS2 emulation on my shit-box toaster. (got a 970 tho so its better now)

But Cemu devs didn't do anything illegal unless they bought the confidential documentation they're using. If someone who broke contract with Nintendo and had their development suite just gifted it to them they're not at any fault.

>Neither could I prove the US spies on you until it was proven the US spies on you

You fucking retard

Proofs needed.

it's completely legal to dump roms of games you legally purchased for personal use, just as it is completely legal to rip songs off of cds you legally purchased for personal use.

>but still everyone knew it happened.

Nope, Nintendo can't do anything but take it up their ass.

The sad thing is people are giving these shitheads money to emulate BotW when they could buy a Wii U for 100 bucks.

>burden of proof

also burden of proof is enshrined in all systems of law across all 1st world countries. its irrelevant what you think you know. its up to the accuser to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they did something wrong.

>giving Nintendo money they don't deserve

I don't think so, Tim.

You sound like you have zero idea how emulators work and less of an idea of what's even happening. You don't optimize the game itself, and they certainly aren't hosting ISOs for people.

>wii u 100 bucks
>botw 60 bucks

realizing you just paid 160 bucks plus tax for 1 GAME

>priceless

Read >you fuckface

Who is everyone and how did he know it?

you "knew" fuck all because there was no proof

>you didn't know because there was no proof
Jesus are you actually this retarded? It's called common sense

Report them. It's disgusting that they get away with it.

ap.nintendo.com/report/

Sony lost. Bleem died for it.

Bleem is Emulator Jesus

>It's called common sense
go plead that in a court case and see how far it gets you lol common sense is making sure to look both ways before crossing the street. it has no bearing on arguments legal or otherwise.

so Sony didn't lose at all.

Don't worry user, Republicans are easily bought. It'll be a federal crime by 2020.

Yeah and Sony got assraped by the developers in court. The only reason Bleem lost is because Sony played dirty and threatened retailers by telling them they would stop selling them their products if they kept selling Bleem at their stores.

What is "common sense" is absolutely irrelevant as far as questions of legality and court proceedings go. For someone who likes to pretend he knows shit about laws you ought to know at least this much.

>muh court case
What are you on about? What happens in court doesn't change what's true or false.
fucking idiots

>butthurt nintenbro

>I don't need proof they stole the code it's common sense

Fucking kill yourself

The burden of proof is on you fucking moron moron.

kek, u think people havent tried this already? ur not gonna change shit

That wasn't my point

>What happens in court doesn't change what's true or false.

its true if you can prove its true. hence the burden of proof. if there is no proof there is no "truth"

conversely its false if you can prove its false. see the need for proof in both instances?

They quite literally did lose

law.cornell.edu/copyright/cases/Sony_v_Bleem.htm

Theres really no argument about this. Emulation is legal and a bunch of whiny corporate bootlicking neckbeards on here isn't going to change that.

You claimed they used stolen source code. Your claim was not reinforced by proof of any kind, all you had on your side is hearsay at worst and popular opinions at best. Without proof of them using stolen source code and violations of intellectual property, you cannot have a serious argument. Understand?

you cared enough to reply

But the burden doesn't change what's true or false.

What is your point exactly?

>considering they're optimizing illegal copies of BOTW
I hope you see how stupid you sound. I don't care if you do it for (you)s. You are fucking retard.

>muh burden of proof
Still clinging on to that? give it a rest. Things are true or false regardless of what's been proven.

Sony didn't lose, Bleem went out of business, which was Sony's goal.

but that has nothing to do with what's actually happening

>stolen devkit

it's a matter of time

>But the burden doesn't change what's true
You can't prove it's true. You have nothing to substantiate your claim. Eat shit.

Waiting months to Play your game for free instead of spending 300+ will be worth it. Can't wait

>But the burden doesn't change what's true or false.

holy fuck is this guy for real? yes it does change everything. if you cant prove something is true then your argument is irrelevant. you may as well piss in the wind

When emulator creators start making big money the case will probably be reopened.

It's clean room reverse engineering.
Basically the legal equivalent of "i accidentally a whole emulator".

>>muh

Not an argument. Either provide proof it's true or fuck off.

shit first one was meant to quote OP

I really, really, really like this image. Can I save it?

>Still clinging on to that? give it a rest. Things are true or false regardless of what's been proven.

they really arnt

itt
retard nintenbabby

To prove stolen codes you literally can compare if there are too many identical lines. Reverse engineering will have way less identical lines than stolen albeit changed code.