If VR costed $150, the massive adoption would push Devs to create more games

If VR costed $150, the massive adoption would push Devs to create more games

It would save VR from the death it's about to face.

Other urls found in this thread:

pushsquare.com/news/2017/09/sony_ships_another_half_million_playstation_vr_headsets
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

...

>death it's about to face.

there's no alternative to view 3D porn

>Watching (((porn)))

Be a man. Take responsibility for yourself. Venture out and stake your future and yourself on a risk that might pay off and go all in. Work out and don't dare let yourself become a physical pussy. Real man shit.

You will inevitably find a real woman along the way. Pitch in hard with her and don't let loose just because you're having a bad day.

Its a self-solving problem. People are just too weak to manifest their potential today because it takes time, patience, effort, risk and responsibility. Real life has a very different reward cycle than, say, an MMORPG.

Anyway, if you do those things you will wind up with a woman who likes a man who does those things, and she'll want to have kids. That's how the circus has continued up to this point.

An overabundance of comfort, not some stupid notion of a conspiracy to destroy society, is going to act as the selection event that will wipe out those humans who lack enough conscientiousness and are too agreeable to carry the species forward.

It's so funny being from the 80s and watch children cry about the "death" of VR constantly because they didn't grow up with real electronics and don't understand the idea of a premium product

Everything you know and take for granted today was once a premium product that normal people could not have...the only thing to really ever skip over this was the ipod

VR is not ever going away, lol. In fact, VR will actually bring arcades back in about 5 years even

Nice try kid I'm from '76

VR died once and it will die again.

Gartner™ says it's in the tough of disillusionment

VR never existed until 3 years ago and isn't going anywhere. If I could bet money on it as a generic entertainment device I'd sink the value of everything i own.

>Vr didn't exist

Were you born in 2002 lmao

>tfw this hits me on so many levels

yeah, as I said, VR didn't exist.

>waste time and money to get some pussy
prostitue or a onahole is a better choice

I just bought a rift, only played superhot so far but that was 10/10

or it wouldve been it it was longer that 2 hours.

Seriously I dont get why its so short. Theres no voice acting or real story telling, the graphics are intentionally low-poly and levels are just the same couple assets in a different room.

Like if there was mod support or a level editor I would stop playing this game

...

I like you and I like the things you say.

>no force feedback
>no ability to feel
why does this shit appeal to people anyways? can't you just zoom the camera in while playing normally anyway? why would you want it to be jittery as fuck while you try and get a good angle with your head?

Dude pc parts should cost 10$ each too! This way everyone would buy a gayming pc, why haven't companies done this????

whats the point if you can't
>smell
>taste
>feel
?

You are never going to get a PC or console headset plus controls for 150. Maybe used if you're lucky.
However you can get phone VR for 16 bucks lol.

I want a real Lamborghini for a dollar.

>hurr im going to be a moralfag about porn on a Korean Paper Maché imageboard

Shut the fuck up retard.
To everyone else, don't fall for the gf meme.

Just because it's bad doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

t. guy who hasnt tried VR
seriously thougha feeling it moving around with your body makes the whole thing 100x more immersive (that and not having a youtube vid on your 2nd monitor while youre playing)

If watching porn would make you instantly stop being a productive person then you're still pretty weak imo

massive adoption would only quicken the death march. as it is, VR is only still alive because it's being circulated exclusively among enthusiasts who are keeping hope alive. once the mainstream has it you will see the same interest curve as the wii or kinect, where there is a big spike because the novelty draws in casuals, and then they remember they don't like or buy video games anyway

t. virgin degenerate

If VR was 150 dollars then a lot more people would be getting into it, but they've basically hit the absolute max on the amount of people willing to buy VR headsets. You need a 980 or above just to run the weakest VR games, and if they want to make anything with grafics you're shit out of luck. VR was, is, and always will be an enthusiast's device.

cause you can still see and hear and 2/5 aint bad

A 970 is enough and is 200$

>VR is about to face death

sales are up by a lot since the last price cut

it's going nowhere but up bb

except i have tried vr on five different occasions. you know what i thought each and every time? this would be so much better if i could FEEL something.

>Caring about the future
lmao you ain't gonna be there to see it faggot just live in the now

I don't think a $150 price tag would do much reall, not that many people have the hardware required to run games in VR. You have to remember that like 90% of Steam users are on intel integrated graphics or 750tis. Hardware is going to have to get a lot cheaper before VR becomes widespread.

>Complaining about 980 being the minimum
What year is it? Also, next year there will be new competitors in the 200$ range. Second gen of the new VR wave is gonna be sweet.

Just one less person to compete with for the QTs

>VR is about to die

When will you brainlets just get a job? It's not our fault you can't afford it.

Why the fuck would you even want to?

It's not the price but the fact that they sell us 5 year old smartphone screens with shit PPI and screendoor effect.
MKII devices with actuallly modern technology when?

>If $800+ graphics cards costed $150, the massive adoption would push Devs to create more good PC exclusives

Or the premium/enthusiast part of any line is always going to be the one that sells the least. Not everyone gets to drive a Lamborghini, and that's exactly the kind of needless excess VR is. Doesn't mean its going anywhere, because the people with the means to get that excess still acquire and enjoy it. It just means any company who jumps into this thinking it will sell to millions of casuals will inevitably get majorly burned.

Everything in VR looks real or real-ish , so when a character stands next to you it is the same height as a real person , and you can get close to them and look in their eyes it's funny cool and weird , and really scary when playing horror games.

13.14% of people on Steam have a computer that is capable of running VR. Not running VR WELL, just the absolute bare minimum for a card
.44% of all Steam users have a VR headset. This number also doesn't take into account the number of times people ship it around to friends' computers. Even if we believe that this number is accurate it means that of that 13.14% of VR-ready users exactly 3.349% of those users have a VR headset.
These headsets are advertised constantly in the media, have multiple ads every sale for VR headsets, and VR games are featured prominently on the Steam page. The most played VR-exclusive game on Steam right now is Gorn with 79 concurrent users, and the most popular VR game of all time released on the Steam store's highest concurrent users is that Rick and Morty game with 976 concurrent on launch. VR is dead and releasing a shitload more VR headsets onto the market isn't going to change shit

>It would save VR from the death it's about to face.
You naysayers are delusional.

Holy shit I think you're on to something

You'd still need to wear a bulky stupid headset that impedes your vision, makes you look like an asshole, and in most cases makes you sick, so no, that gimmick will never take off, sorry.

>VR
vr is already dead in it's tracks,hun

pushsquare.com/news/2017/09/sony_ships_another_half_million_playstation_vr_headsets

>IDC reports that stronger than expected interest in first-person shooter Farpoint and continued momentum from Resident Evil 7: Biohazard is what’s helped give PlayStation VR an “unmatched” lead over the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive
So Exclusives are the main sellers, as usual.

Because it's still better than a flat screen.

Really, the whole "It must do everything first try or not at all" argument is fucking retarded and only the most stupid people use it.

>Console VR

lmao you babies

I DON'T want to see everything become a fucking first person game. This is a good thing.

Here are some games that people say are worth buying VR for:
>Resident Evil 7
>RIGS
>Thumper
>Keep Talking and Nobody Explodes
>The Playroom VR
>Rez Infinite
>Tumble VR
>Eve: Valkyrie/Gunjack
>Until Dawn: Rush of Blood
>Sportsbar VR
>Onward
>Pavlov VR
>GORN
>Battlezone
>Smashbox Arena
>Doom 3 (VR mod)
>Serious Sam VR
>Raw Data
>Lone Echo/Echo Arena
>Arizona Sunshine
>Elite: Dangerous
>Mage's Tale
>Rec Room
>Google Earth VR
>Minecraft (VR mod)
>Dreadhalls
>Robo Recall
>Superhot VR
>Tiltbrush
>Chronos
>The Climb
>NoLimits 2
>Star Trek: Bridge Crew
>Fruit Ninja VR
>Soundboxing
>Vertigo
>Hot Dogs, Horseshoes & Hand Grenades
>The Unspoken
>Audioshield
>Half Life: VR

>only sad lazy virgins watch porn
must be weird not to have an imagination.

The visual stimulus takes up 80% of your overall perception, the rest is just bonus.

Still dead.

play something that you like.

Here's a blanket to go with that statement

Soundboxing is fun too, if you like Audiosurf.

>or so i've heard.

Literally dead.

0.44% adoption on steam.

VR is OUYA Tier dead

No it wouldn't.

>OUYA Tier dead
No, it's more Sega 32x dead.

you know there are devices for that and more. not everyone is as ignorant and afraid of change as you...oh wait.

VR has games in third person and other styles probably. And it looks like you are over a game board with little characters on it or you are following someone as the camera.

550000 VR users doesn't sound bad.

Tried that vr shit once on a third person game. it was fairly fun experience, but i'd imagine that you'll get tired of it in few days. not really worth the trouble

Third person perspective is annoying and only useful for body awareness, which you naturally have in VR anyway.

I do like it though, I like it enough to want more of it

Bullshit

Check out Robo Recall, it's short but free and it's a ton of fun

Presence, user. You have as much a 'feel' of your body and the surroundings as in feel life.

>*real life
Fuck.

vr is free depending on the phone you have and people still aren't clamoring over it

we figured out the ideal format to play videogames with over 30 years ago

I can't even begin to count just how many games and genres simply can't work without an outside perspective

Cardboard is shit. Most of the headsets are uncomfy and have to 'click' button for picking options.

There's also "I Expect You To Die"

sure but it beats sitting and staring at a screen. Now youre standing the screen is glued to your face.

Well we're talking about third person perspective. There are plenty of VR RTS games that put the player in a 'god' view, overlooking the field like a tabletop game and and ordering units around.

Third person can work in a 'floating head' sense but you wouldn't be able to use the controllers to aim guns and wield swords like you could in first person.

depends on the game or system. being the camera it's surprisingly fun. you can just literally just walk around peeking through corners and stuff. while controlling your character. the novelty wears of pretty quick.