What are some video games that make u think?
What are some video games that make u think?
10 or 11, depending on whether or not the monkeys are holding the same parrot.
The rabbit, the monkeys, and their parrots.
The elephants all saw the same two monkeys, and aren't on the way to the river.
when each elephant saw a pair of monkeys, is it the same pair?
the rabbit isnt actually going to the river you fucks
Also depends on how many monkeys there were. There could be as many as infinite monkeys.
every elephant saw 2 monkeys
This doesn't say "they saw exactly 2 monkeys" and it doesn't say "they all saw the same 2 monkeys". There could be as few as 2 or as many as infinity monkeys.
This is a really shitty variant of the classic "as i was going to St. Ives" puzzle
I always fucking hated it though because it never explicitly says the direction of travel of anyone involved, and just assumes meeting someone on the way to a location means the same as "they are coming backwards from the target location", which it FUCKING DOESNT
ARTIFICIAL RIDDLE DIFFICULTY RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
1 rabbit saw ... while going to the river
We got an absolute retard here. It's the elephants who aren't going to the river, so the answer is 5.
A crowd sees a man shitting in the street
Guess the entire street belongs to India by that logic
Okay, so you don't actually have any reading comprehension.
5 is the correct answer, brainlets.
literally impossible to know. who is to say which monkeys the elephants saw? it can be anywhere from 2 to 12 monkeys.
No idea since it didn't specify if the elephants saw the other animals because the elephants were heading away from the river, or just moving slower than the rabbit but faster than the monkey.
I mean really we don't have enough data.
If it said "of the following animals" sure, but it just says how many animals, and there could be more than what is listed.
Five, four if the two monkeys are holding the same parrot.
Obviously you switch the door, are you an retard or something?
The question doesn't ask how many animals were seen going to the river it asks how many animals are going to the river. There could be any number of unseen animals heading to the river we have no way of knowing with this given information.
Okay, so it's established in the first sentence that the rabbit is going to the river, and that one rabbit saw six elephants. These six elephants see two monkeys going to the river. It's never stated that these elephants are going tot he river, so we can count them out. It's then stated that each of the monkeys hold a parrot, so that's two parrots, and since they're held by the monkeys, they're going to the river as well. Thus, one rabbit + two monkeys + two parrots = five animals in total.
The two monkeys
Either both monkeys are holding one parrot, or they have a parrot each
4 or 5
The 12 Monkeys
the 12 parrots
the answer is 25
It's five, you stupid cucks.
1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river
So 1 rabbit is going towards the river, the 6 elephants are irrelevant
Every elephant saw 2 monkeys going towards the river
So that's 2 monkeys going towards the river now
Every monkey holds 1 parrot
2 monkeys each holding 1 parrot = 2 parrots
I really like watching Rick and Morty
ahaha retard your wrong with english lmao
Fucking educate yourselves, americucks
what if the parrots dont go to the river because they are carried? so only two monkeys and 1 rabbit go to the river and 1/2 parrots are carried there?
There is no correct answer the question is flawed
That's like saying you're not going anywhere when riding a train
its 31 you absolute retards
1 + 6 + 12 +12 = 31
Rabbit explicitly stated going to the river.
The two monkeys that 6 elephants saw are explicitly stated going towards the river.
Both monkeys hold a parrot, which have no choice but to go to the river.
5 animals - rabbit, two monkeys, two parrots.
And how do you know if it isn't a case of the rabbit moving faster than the elephant while heading toward the river and overtaking them?
The first fucking sentence is "1 rabbit saw 6 elephants while going to the river."
If you can't figure out the rabbit is going to the river from this sentence, your reading comprehension is awful.
Whether or not the parrots makes the effort or even want to go to the river doesn't change the fact that they are in transit to the river.
There are many flaws with this question but this is not one of them.
ON THE MEATBONE
Seeing how Larry taught us that if it has a tail, its a monkey, it could completely mess with the numbers here. Each of the 6 elephants saw a monkey, so the rabbit could've been one of those 2 monkeys. The other could've just as easily been another one of those elephants. Therefore, there were actually at least 7 monkeys, and since each one was holding a parrot, that makes the number of animals 14. Since parrots have tails, they are also monkeys, and so they themselves were carrying parrots, which they themselves are also monkeys. This puzzle cannot be solved because its impossible to have an infinite number of monkeys.
americuck pretending to be smart
1 rabbit going to the river
12 monkeys (6 elephants * 2 monkeys) going to the river
12 parrots (12 monkeys * 1 parrot) being carried by monkeys towards the river.
Elephants were not stated to be going to the river.
1+12+12 = 25 animals going to the river.
Because the riddle said nothing about the elephants moving. All it said was that the rabbit saw the elephants on its way to the river. If you're going to play semantics, then oh, the rabbits could be at a different river than the monkey. Or oh, the rabbit is going TO the river, not TOWARDS the river
Here's your (You)
Why do the monkeys have parrots?
I believe that's the point of the image. A balance of properly stating the problem in concise terms rather than listing numbers and hope for the best.
Agreed but you can make some assumptions. Since the rabbit saw the elephants, you could assume they traveled together. If you assume that the elephants traveled together and the monkeys weren't hiding, we can assume that they saw the same 2 monkeys.
but then it doesn't specify whether or not the elephants were going towards the river
a number ranging from 3 to 41 depending
rabbit was headin to river
saw the 6 elephants.
those 6 elephants saw 2 monkeys going to the river, each monkey had 1 parrot each
the elephants weren't going towards the river
he doesn't hold a parrot
Your post clearly states 5
1 + 2 + 2 = 4
i was going to say those 2 monkeys share a parrot
one rabbit saw six elephants so animals = 7
every elephant saw two monkeys so 7elephants*2 is 14animals
but each monkey holds parrot so 14+2 means 16 but the rabbit so 17
But what if the monkeys were both holding onto the same parrot? What then?
I'm too simple minded to get this, could someone explain the solution with a food analogy?
You're assuming "Every elephant saw 2 monkeys going towards the river" equates to each elephant saw 2 monkeys independently from what every other elephant saw (6*2). This can also be interpreted as the elephants all saw the same 2, and only 2, monkeys.
It doesn't present a logical conflict with the statement, so it's a possibility.
But motherfucker, you like playing devil's advocate, you bitch.
1 burger was on it's way to the grill
it saw 6 pizza slices on its way
each of those pizza slices saw 2 chickens also heading to the grill
each of those chickens were also holding 1 potato each
how many items of food were going to the grill?
anywhere between 4 and 25, since there could be overlap between what the elephants saw.
well you don't grill pizza...
school is mispelt
you forgot chinese food
ain't no food more american than chinese food
1 rabbit going to river
6 elephants, unknown if going to river, so assumption is no
every elephant saw 2 monkeys going to the river; each elephant saw the same 2 monkeys
1 + 2 = 3
every monkey (2) holds 1 parrot in their hands, so 2
3 + 2 = 5
This food analogy is actually really good because the only food that isn't going to the grill is the pizza.
10/10 animal/food conversion
1 hamburger saw 6 french fries whole going to the river. Every french fry saw 2 chicken nuggets going towards the river. Every chicken nugget holds 1 tomato in in their hands.
How many foods are going towards the river???
the pizza isn't going to the grill friend
In this board you do.
2 monkeys, 2 parrots and one rabbit. the elephants aren't going to the river
Language too unclear, can be interpreted in various ways.
b-because... the pizza... has
5. Elephants aren't going towards the river. EVERY elephant saw two monkeys, with two parrots. Meaning 1 rabbit, two nigs, two parrots.
It’s fucking 19 you retards
I read the last part as together the 2 monkeys are holding the one parrot
2 monkeys seen by all elephants,
1 parrot being held by the two monkeys,
4 in total
12 monkeys, each pair seen by a different elephant,
12 parrots, one for each monkey,
25 in total
get on my FUCKING level
for smarts only
Also my get is the answer
Whats the trick?
You missed one
It's actually 17
There's a difference between "a crowd" and "every person in the crowd" in a grammatical sense.
8 at the top, 6 on the dial, 2 in the text at the bottom, which am i missing?
5 animals are going to the river. It never said the elephants were going.
there's actually 9 at the top
If you want to be anal about it the answer is 4.
The rabbit is "going to the river", the 2 monkeys and their parrots are "going towards the river"
Being specific to the exact words asked in question, how many animals are "going towards the river"? It's 4.
"every person in the crowd sees a man shitting in the street"
the parrots are not going towards the river, they are being carried.
only the rabbit and the 2 monkeys are being described as going towards the river.
oh fuck off that just looks like a jpg compression artifact
Are you fucking implying the letter m is a 3?
Looks more like a 1 to me.
Is this the Layton thread
the parrots are not going towards the river, they are being carried.
where is that bus going?"
IT'S NOT GOING ANYWHERE, IT'S BEING DRIVEN SOMEWHERE DURRR
Oh, I thought you meant the 3 made out of the jpeg artifacts.
It's actually 18.
fuck whoever thought of this
This fucking retard tho
Only the rabbit and the 2 monkeys are going to the river. All elephants saw the same monkeys.
2 in the front, 2 left, 2 in the back, and 2 right.
The top of the pic says it's a battle of English and maths. It's about the wording of the question as much as it's about the numbers.
that is a really bad methaphor, but very befitting of someone who gives such a response.
their mode of transportation doesn't matter, theyll end up at the river, and towards the river is where they are going.
How are the monkiys going without the parrots on their hands dumbo.
Literally impossible to know with this information.
I've done harder operator overloading.
And I like that they skipped 4+7.
both are the same
stupid shit deserves a good response
where are you right now?
5, I went to shcool
4, the rabbit, the pair of monkeys that each elephant saw, and the single parrot both monkeys were holding.
ENGLISH and maths. Use English theory to solve it.
Its four u mong
So all of us itt dropped out of school it seems.
tfw didn't go the shcool
The answer is "these equations don't make sense." This is math, you can't just make up new meanings for the = sign and for numbers.
is it just X * (Y+1)?
that's pretty boring.
one item. food can't see
Was going to say 34 but, since it is following a sequence, 45 makes sense.
Wonder if you're meant to include 4+7.
Doesn't know propositional logic, calls me dumbo
No one stated that the elephants did not see parrots. The statement that all of them saw two monkeys is still true even if the parrots are there.
If you want to leave the impression of being incapable of showing the slightest bit of wit, feel free to proceed like this.
There is not enough information to answer that question.
I used all of the theories, it is unsolvable.