> Sup Forums will defend this
Sup Forums will defend this
Henry Barnes
Adam Reyes
One of these actually got released.
Gabriel Ortiz
What's the problem?
They both look pretty good.
Xavier King
toy story is overrated anyway
Gavin Green
You forgot to add the Switch port
Mason Jones
I really couldn't care less why do you make such a shitty thread?
OP is again a total faggot.
Tyler Morgan
both look good, what's your problem?
James Carter
>right is a movie
>left is a game for a movie machine
Liam Barnes
Dude I wish
Lincoln Adams
this game was so fucking good
Jaxson Torres
>One renders 60 frames per second
>One renders 6 frames per day
Real even comparison, OP
Ryder Anderson
I'll never defend how fucking shitty the original toy story looks.
Jack Anderson
I'm replaying it on my Vita and the controls are so clunky
Nostalgia is a bitch, the jumping is so frustrating
Tyler Fisher
Kh3 runs at 30fps
Dylan Roberts
I don't have thousands of hours of rendering for each frame.
Lincoln Collins
user, if you love any game cause of nostaliga, dont replay it
Landon Allen
Yeah but one was made more than 20 FUCKING YEARS AGO mate. Bet you can find graphic calculators today as powerful as the pc of that time.
And they still manage to make it look worse than the 1995 movie, wow great job lads
Robert Lopez
I wonder how many times we've had this thread now
Austin Baker
Try playing it on an actual playstation I was playing it recently abd if felt fine to me.
Evan Diaz
why did you post two ps4 games
Jaxon Collins
you don't understand animation and literally nobody is going to give you a non-sarcastic (You)
but here's one anyway, nignog
Sebastian Walker
Toy Story aged pretty well
Tyler Jackson
>not toy story racer
youtube.com
Blake Lee
I can't be the only person who has always wanted to fuck Andy's mom
Kayden Kelly
other ignorant user here, and honestly very curious as to why that is actually?
Zachary Jenkins
>87 dual-processor and 30 quad-processor 100-MHz SPARCstation 20s
>film's 110,000 frames required the equivalent of 46 days of continuous processing
>rendering each frame took one to three hours of [a single] SPARC processors time
sunsite.uakom.sk
>One 100MHz HyperSPARC CPU (used in SPARCstation 20) runs at 82 Single Precision MFLOPS:
performance.netlib.org
>The original movie was rendered at 1536x922 (1416192 pixels)
en.wikipedia.org
That's ~24GFLOPS for the render farm. A Titan Xp can do ~12TFLOPS (~500x more).
So a Titan Xp could render the movie in 7952 seconds, or 132 minutes, or around 0.6x as fast as realtime at ~14fps (compared to 1h 21m at 24fps).
But the frames in the movie vary in complexity, with a variance of +/-100%, meaning the more complex scenes would run at ~7fps, and the simpler ones ~21fps.