I want to bang the Spanish king

I want to bang the Spanish king

Spanish king? More like Bashar al-Assad. Am I right guys?

I want to bang the Spanish princess

I want to bang

...

maybe in the 3rd republic revolution

No homo, but that IS one handsome monarch.

Why is he married to a skeleton?

As a leftard pinko I hate the monarchy, but damn are they aesthetic or what.

Do they even do anything to justify your scorn, or can you simply not deal with their existece?

>As a leftard pinko I hate the monarchy,
Why do you hate good?

the existence of a monarchy cannot be justified in a western country

go on, try it

jealousy of successful people.

It's a matter of principle. Monarchies made sense in an illiterate world where someone was groomed from birth to rule a country. The existence of monarchies is stupid in any society with over 50% literacy and the concept of 'constitutional monarchy' is even sillier because constitutional monarchs do nothing but represent the nation abroad.

I don't even care, and they do seem a bit anachronistic, but if they are popular with the people and do no harm that would seem to be all the justification one could need.

>successful
powerful*

Beauty and progress can not exist without peaceful order, and peaceful order only comes from a monarch.

thank you, hungry skeleton.

Western society is based on intrinsic human rights derived from the existance of god. From this natural rights that we Europeans take as axiomatic is the right of property. Monarchy is directly derived from this right as the lands of the country and its rulership belong by right to a person that passed his property in a rightful way to his respective heirs. Marxists just can't understand western culture and civilization

Spain's royals are also among the poorest in Europe with a private fortune of just £3.2m, although the king does get a salary of £107,000 plus an extra £116,000 for expenses.

Literally poorer than youtube money, the Spanish people serve their King and thus their nation well.

With 3,418 rooms, compared to Buckingham Palace's paltry 722, and 1,450,000 square feet of floor space, Spain's Palacio Real de Madrid is the largest royal residence in the world.

>intrinsic human rights derived from the existance of god
>from the existance of god

stopped reading

They don't actually rule though. You should probably try to be less of a butthurt commie.

pewdiepie is richer than the royal family of Spain as is most of Spanish rich people.

>He doesn't understand the origins of western civilization and were the right of property comes from.
You should stop posting before you make a big fool out of yourself

The royal family does not actually live in the Palacio Real for security reasons, they live in the Palacio de la Zarzuela which is outside the city.

The Palacio Real is only used for a handful of ceremonies by the royals, like weddings etc.

>He doesn't understand that pretty much everyone in the West knows that there is no god
>He justifies the existence of a monarchy using a non-existent entity

You should probably take a nap.

never mind these people who are billion times more powerful than the King, yeah focus your hatred on the king stupid goy I mean republicans.

I am justifying monarchy through the right of private property moron. Again you are just too dumb to understand 2 lines of simple text. Take care and go back to r/eddit where you belong

...

>I am justifying monarchy through the right of private property moron

No wonder Spain is going down the ol' shitter if that's how fucking dumb you are.

>rights of property
>monarchy
In Spain people are inferior to the royal family even though they have not be chosen to be their leaders.
In Portugal the only people more powerful than the average citizens are elected by the people.
I understand that the spanish monarchy is the glue that connects the spanish kingdoms but it's disappointing desu.
Salazar unlike Franco,knew that monarchy had no place in a modern society.

>No wonder Spain is going down the ol' shitter if that's how fucking dumb you are.
>Not giving a single argument
>Ad hominem
>No understanding of history or philosophy.
Please leave to leddit.
>In Spain people are inferior to the royal family
By law they aren't. Some people are always inferior materially. And equality was never a western principle to begin with

who cares about how much money a royal family have to waste
They are just a figure, an ambassador of sorts
Any country with a king as head of state should consider leaving the middle age

>equality was never a western principle
slavery used to be a western principe,doesn't make it right
I'm not talking about equality of status,I'm talking about equality of opportunities.
The 2 princesses are born with a better starting point than you,they are more powerful than your mother and sister(if you have) even though they did nothing to achieve that on their own.

You have a monarchy aswell you nigger.

Portugal also has a royal family,they just don't have any power at all and the ''king'' has no power at all.
Portugal is a republic that recognizes the portuguese royal family

>slavery used to be a western principe,doesn't make it right
Not really. It was widely frowned upon after the fall of Rome which is the starting point of Western civilization. Slavery in the colonies was a result of lack of manpower
>I'm not talking about equality of status,I'm talking about equality of opportunities.
>The 2 princesses are born with a better starting point than you,they are more powerful than your mother and sister(if you have) even though they did nothing to achieve that on their own.
This also applies to rich people. Unless you go full commie you cannot really defend your stance

Getting my revenge because my grandfather was killed by Falange.

Not really.Rich people built their status or had their parents build for them.
The royal family only has power because the people recognize it,they're only as powerful as you allow them to be.

>Rich people built their status or had their parents build for them.
If you go back into history enough, you will see that also applies to royalty, back when they were knights and shit.

The portuguese throne pretender looks a stereotypical portuguese, I give him that.

He's also your throne pretender.His mother was the heir of the brazilian throne and his father the heir to the portuguese throne.
He's going to abdicat the ''heirnity'' for his son.His son looks like a faggot
enough with this nonsense.believe in what you want to believe...

>had their parents build for them
Basically inheritance. The main principle behind royal succession

How do you think that the first monarch was crowned?

>t. homo

why the fuck are they blonde

>His mother was the heir of the brazilian throne

She was not. Her father renounced his throne rights and even if he didn't, she was his third child.

Genetics

they are pretty ugly btw. you must be triggered by their blonde hair

B O U R B O N
O
U
R
B
O
N

L É G I T I M I S T E
É
G
I
T
I
M
I
S
T
E

I want to bang the Hungarian king...of the leather underworld

God save the king!

The Polish prince of darkness is also not bad

>The Polish prince
Actually that's a Hungarian gay porn star called Árpád Miklós. He had committed sudoku a couple of years ago, like many hungarians do. It's a venerable tradition.

F

kek

F

The Internet lied to me

F

...

The king did his job in the transition very well, but now there's no need for him. I hope when he dies they abolish the monarchy, there's no point ousting him before then

They are germs/frenchies.

>god
l o l

>"pretty much everyone in the West """knows""" there is no God"
>Nobody is having any kids, the civilisation is in freefall and since the end of the 20th century they've getting wrecked by a group that does believe in one
Really makes you think.

Well, it's way more complex...

whit greek, spanish a many other types of blood

The only shit I know about them it is that the Borbones are a cancer for Iberia.

>need evidence to proof something happened
>need evidence to proof something didn't happen
the latter = shithole countries like Bolivia and middle-eastern ones

Not an argument. Make the claim "there is no God" and you've assumed the burden of proof for your claim.

>police knocks on your door
>you are accused of murder
>theres not any proof but you would need to somehow prove you didnt do it
would you be ok with this scenario then ?
you would love living in Bolivia

What does a legal accusation of murder have to do with the claim "God does not exist"? Nobody's going to throw you in jail for not providing evidence for God's nonexistence, you just won't have philosophical grounding for your claim.

good job Mariano