>ONE DAY I AM GONNA GROW WINGS
>GOD LOVES HIS CHILDREEEEEEEN
>we hope... that you choke...... (nothing personell, kid.)
>le edgy capitalism commentary
>This is what you get, when you mess with us!
How do people like this angsty, whiny 21 pilots tier garbage?
(You)
Read those lyrics over.
TRY to pretend those wouldn't fit perfectly into a my chemical romance or 21 pilots song.
...
It's not really about your little selection of decontextualized lyrics. It's more about the sum of an entire piece, in which case Radiohead is light years ahead of either of those bands.
this isnt even a remotely close music context. its like comparing the smiths to tears for fears
I thought the album was about becoming complacent with life.
I get that you're trying to make people mad but this straight up doesn't make any sense
I'm not even a radiohead fan, but this is retarded. If this isn't bait you should feel bad about yourself
>Radiohead is light years ahead of either of those bands.
>Radiohead
>ahead of my chemical romance and 21 pilots
You listen to tears for fears, letting me know you're under 21. opinion = discarded
I don't understand how it's possibly for simple quotes from a song to "not make sense"
are you new? do you not know what greentext means on mu
he is quoting the cringy lines from ok computer
what is there not to get, the music is good but hes right on thom being a angsty and whiny little manlet
I don't even agree with op but people like this is why everyone hates radiohead and its fanbase
OKC is fine, but it's way overrated. The only good track on the album is Lucky.
>mfw this is what people do with Turn On the Bright Lights but they're being serious
Airbag > Let Down > Lucky
Read the lyrics over.
TRY to pretend you didn't take them completely out of context of the rest of their respective songs.
Gonna need a little more in-depth arguments if you want to actually try and convince people that the lyrics are bad.
Within the context of OK Computer, I don't see how the lines are cringy at all.
its still whiny and angsty garbage, regardless of context. such corny ass lines might as well ruin what little """"""""""""""""Depth""""""""""""""""""" the songs had to begin with.
>radiohead fans even defend the absolute worst parts of radioheads music, the emberassing and angsty lyrics
i need to start distancing from the fanbse its so emberassing
Do we really need an OKC thread every fucking day? Jesus Christ talk about something else
we will when something better is made
>his primary critique of ok computer is the lyrical content
what about the stellar production work and atmosphere, j greenwood's arrangements and thom yorke's ear for melody
art rock in general is so much more than whatever's going on in the lyrics (which sound fine with the music itself anyway given yorke's aforementioned ear for melody)
nothing wrong with that
kek
Go suck a lemon
Thom himself has said that lyrics dont really matter
tbqh I couldn't understand half of what he was saying on this album until i looked it up. Still loved it though
exactly, and they rarely do anyway. if you want wordplay and prose and substantial storytelling then pick up a goddamn book -- you're only wasting your time otherwise.
they are all objectively good lyrics
he's right, but radiohead has pretty good lyrics anyway
>>Radiohead is light years ahead of either of those bands.
>>Radiohead
>>ahead of my chemical romance and 21 pilots
can you actually form an argument, you weenie? why aren't they? you have literally nothing to disprove the first part of post
one day, Sup Forums will realize that this shit does not bang
TRIGGERRED