You can't discuss jewish crimes in history on Sup Forums or you get a GLOBAL BAN. /his is worse than a public high school history class. Politically Correct Topics only! I'll reproduce the post that got me banned below.
Take the case of Little Saint Hugh. Liberals and jews lie by omission about the facts of the case. Poor Hugh was seen with the Jew Koppin going to his home. When he went missing, they searched Koppin's home and found Hugh in the well. He had ritual torture marks that recreated what Jesus went through. There was a crown of thorn with the body. This is enough circumstantial and physical evidence to convict someone today. What do liberals and jews do? They delete the facts. They only speculate, without any evidence, about torture and false confessions. They are scum who cover up the torture and murder of children!
Children like Hugh were punctured dozens of times to bleed them to death, slowly, while completing the occult ritual. There are several cases like Hugh. What do liberal academics and jews say about this? They absurdly demand skeletal damage, which would not be expected given the recorded ritual. These weren't violent stab wounds that would leave the victim dead quickly and injure bone. These were sadistic cuts and punctures that allowed the blood ritual to be fully completed before the victim died. We know this because Hugh was just one of many children who suffered the same fate.
Time traveling serial killers or jewish ritual murders? Occam's Razor.
Alexander Gutierrez
It was real. There are a few undeniable cases like Simon of Trent and Little Saint Hugh where liberals have to intentionally lie and leave out facts in any discussion. Moreover, there are just so many cases, over such a wide geographic range, through hundreds of years that it is undeniably true. This isn't a pattern of antisemitism. There are patterns to the physical evidence.
You have babies drained of blood in multiple countries over a long period of time. You have adolescent boys stabbed dozens of times, many of whom were circumcised when they were killed. These aren't patterns of random deaths being blamed on jews. Moreover, most people were illiterate, even books let alone news were very rare, so the idea that people isolated from each other by time, language, and space would all report that jews were killing children in very specific ways (including finding bodies) is undeniable evidence that this was an occult ritual of certain jewish sects. That or time traveling serial killers. Antisemitism certainly doesn't fit the overall pattern.
Liberal academics and jews will cherry pick a couple of these cases and "debunk" them. That is not how rational people think. It isn't if one or two are incorrect. It is if ten are correct.
Leo Watson
Even jews who look at the evidence agree that jewish ritual murders of children occurred. For those who don't know, there are different ethnicities of jews. Sephardic and Ashkenazi jews coexisted in several countries during the middle ages. Pretty much only Ashkenazis were accused of ritual murders. Corpses of tortured children were ONLY found near Ashkenazis. Your teachers, liberals, and jews cover up these damning patterns.
Ian Roberts
...
Nolan Richardson
If "this" is "ritually torture and kill Christian children for their blood", then yes, yes they did.
Andrew Allen
Ok
Grayson Cook
Good thing they start to ban inveterate bullshitude.
Kevin Martinez
welcome to the shadow realm, Elie Wiesel
Ayden Allen
They also ran the slave trade.
>but the MSM keeps saying David Duke is a KKK leader >how does he have better primary and secondary sources on this issue than my teachers Just don't bring this up in your high school history class or on /his. Real history isn't allowed.
Well, it was a Global Ban for correcting a secondary source that intentionally left out damning facts to conform to a predetermined narrative ("Jews are awesome who never do anything wrong. It is always antisemitism. If you say otherwise you are a bigot.")
Josiah Mitchell
TORfag here.
What is a ban?
Easton Foster
DON'T YOU READ THE TOS. YOU CAN'T USE PROXIES HERE. IT IS AGAINST THE RULES
Jaxon Ross
Oh gosh I had no idea, I'll stop immediately and write a 5-page apology letter and beg the modfags to forgive me!
Mason Kelly
no one gives a fuck
Michael Ortiz
You also sucked your teachers' cocks in high school. Why are there so many conformist losers on /b?
Luke Turner
>conformist apatheist nothing you are whining about matters in the least
Michael Thompson
This is just weird. I am not saying there is a connection but it just freaks me out.
Ayden Wilson
you can here.
maybe you need to learn the rules, retard. if you went to certain boards and said "all niggers should die", you'd be banned. not in Sup Forums.
if you went to canada and said "all jews should die", you'd be breaking a specific law of suggesting genocide. not in the US.
Adrian Bennett
Jews are a disgrace most of /b already knows that my newfriend
Isaac Thomas
Read the image. You can't bring up a historical fact simply because it makes jews look bad. Even on Sup Forums. You can't discuss actual history on /hist because jews get offended. No one else is afforded whiteout to use how they wish on the historical record.