Solve this
Solve this
Carson Hill
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
translate.google.com
duckware.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Caleb Myers
Do your homework all by yourself
Isaiah Hall
No, fuck you.
Luke Stewart
here it is
Sebastian Martinez
fuck, you were faster
Ayden Richardson
30
Joseph Martinez
X=30 dipshit look at your angle location it's a real set of infinite numbers {x|30|(infinite,30)}
Carter Watson
explain
Jose Thompson
x
Here faggot
Nathan Peterson
don't tell me what to do
William Hughes
bump, interested in how it is solved
Cameron Davis
don't think there's enough info to solve it
Juan Young
Yeah, it's definitely 30°.
Just haven't figured out why yet.
Draw it out and start filling in any angles you can.
Probably will end up solving an equation.
Asher Parker
...
Thomas Sullivan
40
Jeremiah Brown
Done
Oliver Phillips
...
Leo Flores
Now tell me an actual real world purpose for this.
Blake Nelson
...
Julian Cruz
...
Leo Sanders
You're probably wondering "I can guess that, but *why is it 30"?
>you are very lazy.
Coming to a correct answer involves not just looking at each angle individually to see what will fit, but to look at two angles added together, and logically arguing what could possibly work.
For example, the answer x is easy to see (after my working...) because 180 = x + 110 + 40.
We can see that the angle I figured out to be 110 was obtuse, simply by sight.
Basically, I'm not going to hold your hand to show you exacly how I figured the answer. It is clear that you have not been paying attention in class. I suggest you *heavily* revise geometry and angles.
Christopher Taylor
How did you get the 60 and 100 degree angles on the top triangle?
Nicholas Cooper
winrar
Luis Moore
...
Ian Collins
thus
Angel Butler
buildings and shit
Camden Clark
So I don't think you can get there just by adding angles to 180°.
I think the key is to somehow find these similar triangles within the figure?
But I'm late for class.
Good luck user.
Wyatt Murphy
You reckon the two triangles in the middle are a mirror image of each other, champ?
>b-b-back to the drawing board.
I hope you are trolling.
Adrian Rodriguez
this one is correct op.
Cameron Wilson
God is this babby's first attempt at social engineering? I told you to revise pahjeet, now get to it, before you have to explain to your parents why you are stupid.
God, just imagining the angle on the right side as 90 pains my heart.
Andrew Williams
Only correct answer in this whole thread. Nice job, user.
Levi Peterson
these images normally arent drawn twith a protractor. its the (correct) math that counts.
Ryan Cook
140 and 130 should be red, since they're accurately calculated from previous red angles. I'm still having trouble how you concluded with the other 4 blue angles, but I'll keep looking at it
Oliver Mitchell
>I wonder if this retard even started looking at the isosceles triangles yet...tick tock pahjeet
Easton Gomez
I'm the one you posted to. I've been checking it out, but can't really focus on it right now. Will probably check it later.
Logan Morris
No. Your blue 60 is supposed to be 80, making x=30
Jackson Perry
this
Isaiah Martin
I got everything but the 70/60 and the 90/50 angles. How did you solve for those? it's been like 20 years since i've taken geometry. How did you determine those four angles?
Gavin Scott
45°
Nathan Adams
thank you that makes much more sense
Jace Miller
This, I can't figure out how people are getting those angles either.
Dominic Smith
here's a hint for the kiddies who think they can just use "add to 180" to find the answer.
Nathaniel Torres
There is nothing directly telling you in which values you have to divide the 130 and 140 angles, you only know you have to divide them in 2 parts and that they have to add up to 180 (when counting the 50 and 40 respectively), it has multiple solutions.
Grayson Turner
William Johnson
look at fig. 22 all the way at the bottom, look at the content of the chapter, and tell me this isn't a troll thread.
Isaiah Turner
Tyler Garcia
HEHE EKS DEE FUNNY ME-ME
Brayden Diaz
...
Caleb Anderson
X = 55°
Caleb Lee
Ooooh nice solution!
Also, fucking kek, you got me
Asher Foster
30
Jeremiah Moore
Daniel Parker
Bentley Walker
> problem can be solved without trigonometry
> uses trigonometry anyways
Don't go for your math degree, you won't get far. I recommend engineering instead.
Juan Powell
an answer is an answer
Thomas Ortiz
Damn, I was had
Juan White
Exactly the words of an engineer.
I also don't recommend physics for you.
Joshua Bell
thanks
Ethan Reyes
recommend away, i already run a physics lab
Ian Wilson
The best part was he went through the trouble of making an entirely valid proof
Levi Phillips
> Run a physics lab
I am impressed.
Isaac Peterson
they are all here
Isaac Collins
You assume the two 65 angles are equal. Why?
Benjamin Robinson
Its actually very lack luster, compromising non stop to get grant money. Applied physics is fairly heavy on engineering, you need solutions which can be easily managed with variables, so there is little use for elegant math. Sad stuff really.