How the fuck is this not a goal?

How the fuck is this not a goal?

I wonder why

technology is 100% infallible

get fucked you faggot

Whole of the back wasn't over the line, pretty simple, Hristo

cant argue with goal line technology my dude

The ball looks deformed there near the line.

WHOLE OF THE BALL
WHOLE OF THE LINE

based technology saving us from weeks of pointless arguements and scousers crying refball

TYBGLT

the definition of goal is that the whole ball must cross the goal line

get fucked

...

THANK YOU BASED GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY

thank you based goal line technoolgy

>ball clearly touching the line

THANK YOU BASED GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY

HAHAHAHAHAHA GET FUCKED LIVERSHIT

THANK YOU BASED GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY

96 GET

such a seething salty little cunt

THANK YOU BASED GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY

TYBLGBT

TYBGLT

kek reminds me of this

The whole ball must pass the line

TYBGLT

Looks like the right call if that's the furthest it went

It was in

t. Karius

do not fuckin slip next time retard

>be 3-1
>Against bournemouth
>need to be given a goal that isn't a goal just to get a point
>cry when it isn't given

This is their year apparently, what exactly did they mean by that?

ref

Thank you based goal line technology

Romania can't keep getting away with this!

Thanks Liverpoo for another classic slip today

Just when I thought memes are just memes, they lose 4-3 to fucking Boredmouth. Fucking hell what a joke of a team.

Goal line technology is one of the stupidest things in football. I mean you can loose goal after 30 cm offside because linesman is blind, but you can't scored because ball of 0,05 cm on line. Besides how do we know that goal line is that accurate? Technology isn't completely accurate there is always some error.
In 50 years everything will be decided by computers and sport will be dead, thank you fucking goal line for starting it.

It's okay we'll just beat down Manc and Arsenal again zzz

Sure, la'. Just a friendly reminder that Ozil, Koscielny, and Mustafi didn't even play that match

>On the subject of goal-line technology, the IFAB approved changes to the new 2014 Testing Manual, including a higher standard of a +/-1.5cm margin of error for the accuracy of GLT systems
That's the fifa standard, but hawkeye claims a 5mm margin of error.

And we played without Matip and Milner

>we'll

Imagine giving up for goals to Bournemouth in one single game.

so the whole ball has to be in, even in ridiculous circumstances like this?

interdasting. I thought just once it passes the white line. sorry for being American

How is goal decision system accurate if the final image is not from the top down?
The way they have it now it's all perspective and it looks like it's in and not in at the same time

>overreacting this hard

It's determined statistically and the final frame is just a representation instead of the real picture if the tennis hawkeye is anything to go by.

cricket too

LIVERPOO!!!!

>deluded scousers and norwegian liverpool fans will argue that the objective and faultless computer measuring is ABL and didn't see it 'slip over the line'