How the fuck is this not a goal?
How the fuck is this not a goal?
I wonder why
technology is 100% infallible
get fucked you faggot
Whole of the back wasn't over the line, pretty simple, Hristo
cant argue with goal line technology my dude
The ball looks deformed there near the line.
WHOLE OF THE BALL
WHOLE OF THE LINE
based technology saving us from weeks of pointless arguements and scousers crying refball
TYBGLT
the definition of goal is that the whole ball must cross the goal line
get fucked
...
THANK YOU BASED GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY
thank you based goal line technoolgy
>ball clearly touching the line
THANK YOU BASED GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY
HAHAHAHAHAHA GET FUCKED LIVERSHIT
THANK YOU BASED GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY
96 GET
such a seething salty little cunt
THANK YOU BASED GOAL LINE TECHNOLOGY
TYBLGBT
TYBGLT
kek reminds me of this
The whole ball must pass the line
TYBGLT
Looks like the right call if that's the furthest it went
It was in
t. Karius
do not fuckin slip next time retard
>be 3-1
>Against bournemouth
>need to be given a goal that isn't a goal just to get a point
>cry when it isn't given
This is their year apparently, what exactly did they mean by that?
ref
Thank you based goal line technology
Romania can't keep getting away with this!
Thanks Liverpoo for another classic slip today
Just when I thought memes are just memes, they lose 4-3 to fucking Boredmouth. Fucking hell what a joke of a team.
Goal line technology is one of the stupidest things in football. I mean you can loose goal after 30 cm offside because linesman is blind, but you can't scored because ball of 0,05 cm on line. Besides how do we know that goal line is that accurate? Technology isn't completely accurate there is always some error.
In 50 years everything will be decided by computers and sport will be dead, thank you fucking goal line for starting it.
It's okay we'll just beat down Manc and Arsenal again zzz
Sure, la'. Just a friendly reminder that Ozil, Koscielny, and Mustafi didn't even play that match
>On the subject of goal-line technology, the IFAB approved changes to the new 2014 Testing Manual, including a higher standard of a +/-1.5cm margin of error for the accuracy of GLT systems
That's the fifa standard, but hawkeye claims a 5mm margin of error.
And we played without Matip and Milner
>we'll
Imagine giving up for goals to Bournemouth in one single game.
so the whole ball has to be in, even in ridiculous circumstances like this?
interdasting. I thought just once it passes the white line. sorry for being American
How is goal decision system accurate if the final image is not from the top down?
The way they have it now it's all perspective and it looks like it's in and not in at the same time
>overreacting this hard
It's determined statistically and the final frame is just a representation instead of the real picture if the tennis hawkeye is anything to go by.
cricket too
LIVERPOO!!!!
>deluded scousers and norwegian liverpool fans will argue that the objective and faultless computer measuring is ABL and didn't see it 'slip over the line'