ITT: Bands with amazing sonic evolution.
I don't ever care if they're even good or not, just bands where if you listened to their first album and their last album without knowing who they are you wouldn't know it was the same band/artist.
ITT: Bands with amazing sonic evolution.
I don't ever care if they're even good or not, just bands where if you listened to their first album and their last album without knowing who they are you wouldn't know it was the same band/artist.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
...
Well, you're not technically wrong.
The band that did "Creep"
Maybe not their first and last, but if you told me the guys that made Pure Guava also made White Pepper I wouldn't believe you
You know it to be true
>they could have been the next Beatles, if they were smarter
I like them but thats just wrong
Hey, you can deny an explosion of talent and maturity since Blink-182
Also, for some reason, their early songs remind me of Pet Sounds
Ulver of course.
mbv
...
>bands that succumb to trends and marketing ploys, the thread
Black Sabbath
Ah, yes, because Revolution 9 was part of the sound collage trend amongst all the 68 teeny boppers.
I could've just as easily posted Zappa or Waits.
this
Also Animal Collective
Which marketing ploy?
Bands followed The Beatles trends.
muh acid was literally every album in 1968. any original psychedelic band peaked in 1967 anyway
Revolution 9 wasn't exactly like the generic muh acid though. And since Tomorrow Never Knows came out in 66 I guess your point is moot by your own reasoning?
>Who are the Zombies
The band Oceana made a really cool transition, . Used to be metal core, they're shit now making synth oriented music and have a different name, but there was a nugget of great music made on their EP mid transition.
>First Album (metalcore)
youtube.com
>Transitional period (rock music with a fantastic temperament)
youtube.com
I've posted the "transition song" here before but I never get replies. I don't know if its because this board is super dismissive of old metalcore bands or what but someone should give this a shot, it's a good jam.
with exception of the beatles, and the zombies, who were literally
>marketing, the band
anyway
The fuck happened?!?
>The Zombies
What are you referencing here?
why has nobody posted this yet
Ulver is a good one
...
Deftones went from angsty nu-metal to shoegazey alt-metal to djenty chug chug metal and all of it is good.
>Djenty chug chug metal
Kek
>all of it is good.
name a bad Deftones album
Most good bands r like this
Guys fucking Nirvana
By the end they reached the perfect mix of all of the things they were trying to say
This fucking band right here. The remastered version of pic related is god-tier
Why is beatles style songwriting dead?
And by that I mean, pop music with modulation, out of key chords, tempo changes, etc etc etc
Obviously this applies to a lot of pop music of Beatles time, but it seems that a lot of pop is groove based. By that I mean, stay in one key and pretty much remains there, plays the same riff over and over.
I just mean in a pop music context btw, I'm aware that more niche genres like prog stuff and metal will have more complex writing.
Tyler, The Creator
In normal language groove based describes funk but i guess you special
>Describes funk hurr durr
You obviously aren't aware that a "groove" can be multiple things. Have you ever heard of a band "getting into a groove"? That's what I mean. REPETITION. Will that suffice or do you need to be more autistic about words?
Black flag changed alot
Have you ever heard of not being a social retard and knowing what terms mean in general culture? Are you black?
Out of interest what du like thats not groove based by your definition
Stereolab definitely.
>lo-fi noise pop --> krautrock meets TVU meets france --> electronic lounge future music --> electronic jazz future music --> stripped-back dual-mono indie pop --> lush playful art pop
Ulver completely changed genres at least a dozen times
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
>any original psychedelic band peaked in 1967 anyway
nice blanket statement moron.
>Silver Apples
>OTC
you should have said it is rhythmically focused, or focused on repetition of simple melodies, then. most pop is not based on grooves.
>>Who are the Zombies
>The Zombies
>Marketing: the band
Listen to Odessey and Oracle. The songs have some super unusual themes for the era.
From a broader ethnomusicological perspective, groove has been described as "an unspecifiable but ordered sense of something that is sustained in a distinctive, regular and attractive way, working to draw the listener in."[2] Musicologists and other scholars have analyzed the concept of "groove" since around the 1990s. They have argued that a "groove" is an "understanding of rhythmic patterning" or "feel" and "an intuitive sense" of "a cycle in motion" that emerges from "carefully aligned concurrent rhythmic patterns"
Apparently pop music of today, which is mostly dance music, is not based on grooves :-)