Talk peacefully about the artist of the decade, Claire Elise Boucher aka Grimes.
>I'm in the zone of just throwing things at a wall. I'm trying to be unlimited by “this is sound of the album” or something. I'm trying to do the craziest shit I can, or just reach outside my comfort zone. I've been doing a song a day kind of thing. Like, get as far as I can on a song per day then start a new thing. Then once I have a various amount of things, then I'll go back and decide what to do with it. >i just made the most insane song i'm so happy about it!!!
you're insane for being so intensely intolerant of those who you disagree with.
even outside of this instance, you will viciously attack anybody who says something even remotely negative about grimes and then try to get them banned. you need to stop being so one-dimensional. there is always something to be learned from your opponent, and the second you dismiss those who you disagree with as useless garbage is the second you become an ignorant dogmatist. plugging your ears and throwing a tantrum
Connor Gomez
Nice flooding
Ian Taylor
Post cute Hayleys.
Gabriel Reyes
WTF is wrong with you? Did you forget your pills?
Brayden Williams
the second you dismiss those who you disagree with as useless garbage is the second you become an ignorant dogmatist. plugging your ears and throwing a tantrum
Aaron Scott
go away
Aiden Lopez
first for grimes is the artist of the decade
Josiah James
lmao the other general really just get deleted? the text was all there for a legitimate discussion it was purely the picture that warrented it being deleted?
This happens with no other artist, fucking grimesmod needs to be stopped.
>inb4 ban because of some obscure unrelated rule
Robert Lee
it's not the mods. it's the narcissistic grimesfag who reports anything and everything that offends him personally on the grounds of "trolling"
Nicholas Hall
it's one mod, /grimesmod/ he got recruited with the last haul and has been shitting up this place ever since, obviously the 3-4 grimes posters having been making it worse but /grimesmod/ has taken it to another level
Nathan Cox
that was a troll thread and you know it, fucker
Ryan Sanders
was the other general that got deleted made before this one?
Grayson Barnes
well before this one by like 30 minutes, it had everything for a grimes general and was going along fine, but the OP picture was one of the shopped grimes pics so it had to be deleted cause grimesmod couldnt masturbate over the pic
Ian Lopez
:)
Ethan Gonzalez
nice drowning
Liam Young
it wasn't a "general" just a weak attempt to piss off grimes fans this kind of shit belongs to and the mod did everything right
Eli Cox
>troll thread see just because it offends your overly-sensitive personality doesn't mean it's trolling. you're just a crybaby who probably never heard the word "no" growing up
Jaxson Sullivan
>you're just a crybaby and you are just a troll who failed to ruin a thread with a shopped picture enjoy your ban, moron
Luke Collins
>it wasn't a "general" >just a weak attempt to piss off grimes fans in that case, this isn't a general either. it's just a weak attempt to piss off those who don'e like grimes. this thread pisses me off. therefore it's trolling. therefore it should be deleted.
do you see how self-absorbed and solipsistic you are? it astounds me how many times i have to say this. the board doesn't revolve around you. just because something triggers your hypersensitivity doesn't make it trolling
Kayden Allen
and you're just a troll who succeeded in ruining a board with a shitty waifu. if i'm getting banned for something as innocuous as that, then so are you.
Jeremiah Robinson
feat: grimes
Aaron Barnes
the posting of grimes offends me. i realize that posting grimes isn't against the rules inherently, but since it makes me angry, it constitutes as trolling. therefore this thread should be deleted. and the grimesfag who made it should be banned.
Mason Cox
wow. this is disgusting
Jose Allen
>posts in a thread about an artist he dislikes >doesn't know how to use filters >being that much retarded
Andrew Richardson
ever tried to go out?
Matthew Jenkins
don't change the subject. i'm allowed to post wherever i want. that post used the exact same logic that you are using.
Benjamin Rogers
see i just exposed how bullshit your definition of "trolling" is and now you're resorting to some kindergarten-tier ad-hominem
Aiden Butler
LUV HER
Juan Kelly
in fact, posting thisis 1000000x more trolling than posting an ugly picture of an ugly musician
David Robinson
If you don't like the thread and/or the artist then just leave. If it's still not clear for you, then you are a legit autist.
Matthew Bailey
>posting an ugly-photoshopped picture of a beautiful musician ftfy
Ethan Scott
>the text was all there for a legitimate discussion it was purely the picture that warrented it being deleted? Do you think we're stupid? Posting threads with ugly trollish pictures under the guise of being legit threads is against the rules. Deal with it.
Levi Evans
If you don't like the people who don't like the thread and/or artist then just leave. If it's still not clear for you, then you are a legit autist.
John Phillips
irrelevant opinion.
Angel Morris
Stop trying to mess with the Grimethreads dumbfuck. Do you think it's ok to post shitty images edited in Photoshop to be as disgusting as possible and then act like nothing happened? Who do you think you are, scumbag?
Ryder Butler
continuing with your "logic."
Luis Sullivan
>Do you think it's ok to post shitty images edited in Photoshop to be as disgusting as possible and then act like nothing happened? yes. that's the whole point of this argument. there is NOTHING wrong with doing this. it happens for EVERY SINGLE other artist on this board. see pic related. the only reason why it's causing a stir here is because grimesfags are the whiniest crybabies to ever exist.
if you don't like us making fun of your precious waifu then leave.
Landon Roberts
>the only reason why it's causing a stir here is because grimesfags are the whiniest crybabies to ever exist. So, you know they're offended by that and yet you're still posting it. That's TROLLING. Don't mess with the rules or the rules will hit you hard. >if you don't like us making fun of your precious waifu then leave. We're not going to play your game in our thread. Is it clear? Now leave.
Ryan Stewart
>unironically doing the equivalent of putting his fingers in his ears and yelling "la la I can't hear you"
>acknowledging that it offends you when it shouldn't means that you're purposely offending them Just because people don't cater to your childish wants does not make them trolls
Dylan Peterson
>it happens for EVERY SINGLE other artist on this board. see pic related. That pic related is actually funny. Unlike that grotesque and disgusting edited picture that you claim there's nothing wrong with it. Actually your dirty mind is wrong on every level.
Julian Bailey
why are you here?
Jose Murphy
lame comment.
Andrew Sullivan
>So, you know they're offended by that and yet you're still posting it there is a difference between posting something for the sole purpose of getting a reaction and posting something for another purpose but knowing that a reaction will come as a consequence.
grimes is bad. i'm saying that because i believe it. even though i know you're going to go into full rage mode because i said it, that's not the reason why i said it. that isn't trolling. that's just you once again, expecting the world to cater to your over-sensitivity
Joseph Butler
Even the mods were offended by your paper thin trolling. Don't talk about childish wants when you're whining ITT that mods btfo your shitty thread. Accept the reality like a man.
Daniel Cooper
>enjoy your ban, moron oh look another grimesfag treating the mods like their his own personal little police force
can't really blame him tho because the mods literally fucking are
Liam Robinson
>That pic related is actually funny. Unlike that grotesque and disgusting edited picture O P I N I O N
Robert Williams
>there is a difference between posting something for the sole purpose of getting a reaction and posting something for another purpose but knowing that a reaction will come as a consequence. Explain that to mods. Trolling is trolling, no matter how you spin it. That thread has zero reasons to exist. >grimes is bad. i'm saying that because i believe it. Whatever floats your boat. It doesn't affect me at all. This is not trolling. That thread was trolling.
Jason Phillips
>doesn't have an argument so he just makes shit up and insults me Lol
The grimes pictures are funny though, it's the same principle. X is short so photoshopping him to look really short is funny. Grimes is ugly so photoshopping her to look really ugly is funny. What's the difference other than that Grimes is too important to you
Zachary Anderson
this. that picture of nazi grimes is actually extremely accurate. this has become a dictatorship.
grimes makes terrible music. (inb4 ban)
Hunter Russell
Common sense opinion
Charles Wood
>he got recruited Fyi mods aren't recruited. Janitors are. And janitors only have limited powers (e.g. they can't ban people.) Given how much of a tizzy you guys get up to any time something happens here administratively that you don't like (e.g. your thread gets deleted because the OP was an eyesore in comparison to another thread on the same topic also currently in catalog) I'd expect know more about how this place works...
Believe it or not, this site actively encourages the contribution of quality content. If you're gonna start a thread that purposefully doesn't look aesthetically pleasing, don't be surprised or outraged if it gets upstaged by one that does. What else would you expect?
Luis Wright
you belong to
Zachary Murphy
>Explain that to mods That's what he's doing
>trolling is trolling, no matter how you spin it You realize that you're doing the equivalent of a judge, after being told that a defendant committed manslaughter, saying "first degree murder is first degree murder, no matter how you spin it", and then sentencing the defendant to death. Please think before you post.
Hunter Gomez
>my opinion is more right than yours when are you going to get over yourself?
Hunter Thompson
you belong to
William Sullivan
>threads should be aesthetically pleasing That's subjective. Imagine if there was a rule for "you must post good music", can you imagine how stupid that would be?
>no argument
Josiah Turner
>That thread has zero reasons to exist oh wowee
these fucking generals have zero, Z E R O reason to exist. they're fucking asinine, theres never any relevant discussion, and grimes hasnt even released an album in TWO FUCKING YEARS. You faggots literally sit around and talk about her fucking instagram posts. This is all disregarding the fact that despite your insistence on these generals having a place on this board (which they dont, never have, and never will) still allow the fucking grimes discussion to overflow and STILL make other fucking dumbass threads to talk about grimes DESPITE THERE BEING A SPECIFIC RULE ON Sup Forums FORBIDDING DUPLICATE TOPICS. of course the mods never delete those threads because they've very much decided to pick a side.
Matthew Wilson
Is posting John Lennon's absolute madman photoshopped pic allowed, grimes police force?
Leo Wright
>no u oh wow
Daniel Carter
it's my personal opinion that the musical artist grimes is unspeakably hideous.
Chase Rogers
see
Gavin Bennett
then why are you posting in a grimes thread? also >not discussing music on Sup Forums >not being nice to grimes
Eli Cooper
>no u to an already baseless shitpost that had nothing to do with the discussion in the thread oh wow indeed. maybe next time i'll try responding with a developed argument as to why i'm posting on Sup Forums rather than Sup Forums
Matthew Young
Dumb grimesfags, thread was deleted because it was made before the old one reached bump limit, not because it was "an evil trolling thread :'(((". I can post you a screenshot if you don't believe it
Angel Roberts
>someone making actual discussion belongs on Sup Forums but one person repeatedly responding with the same thing does not inb4 you belong to Sup Forums
Jordan Phillips
>Grimes is ugly so photoshopping her to look really ugly is funny. Nice try. Funny for you, haters.
Camden Hernandez
Mate I've seen this before. I made a thread after the previous one hit bump limit, it was first, yet I still got hit with a warning for duplicate topics. Either way, kpop does the same thing and they never get threads taken down, especially if the thread is still alive and the old one hits bump limit
Carson Jackson
>not discussing music on Sup Forums every time somebody comes into these threads and accuses you of this you fall back on >grimes is a musician and you're allowed to discuss musicians on mu. but as soon as somebody flips it the other way, you'll attack them with the exact same argument that you've dodged time and time again.
you are the biggest hypocrite that i've ever met and this level of cognitive dissonance should be examined by a therapist
Jacob Scott
>I can post you a screenshot if you don't believe it do this pls
Ian Morales
This. There's a rule about quality content. Posting a shitty picture meant to defame her + copying the intro text from a legit thread is not quality content. It's lame trolling. That hater may whine the whole year, he's still wrong.
Asher Brooks
>That's subjective. It ABSOLUTELY IS. It's also right in the site-wide rules #6 to be exact): >The QUALITY of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-QUALITY images and informative comments.
What does "quality" really mean? Whatever the hell mods/janitors want it to. And how can you/I tell what that is? By observing what they do/don't delete.
Don't like this policy? (can't say I'm a huge fan myself given how things like KPop seem to have a free pass regarding e.g. the "informative content" clause, but I can live with it.) Go to a different site that doesn't work this way. Or start your own. I've been seriously considering the latter for quite some time now desu.
Samuel Torres
Ever notice how everyone who dislikes Grimes only ever mentions her appearance and never criticise the music Really makes you think
Case in point
Luke Hall
The text says only about posting a new thread before the previous one reached bump limit and doesn't mention word "trolling" at all which proves once again this person ( ) is delusional and needs to understand rules don't revolve around him and his personal wishes.
Thomas Diaz
>these fucking generals have zero, Z E R O reason to exist. they're fucking asinine, theres never any relevant discussion, and grimes hasnt even released an album in TWO FUCKING YEARS. Boo hoo, and you're still (shit)posting in them! If they have zero reasons to exist why do you contribute here with your idiocy? Gotcha! Not an album in 2 years? The Beatles didn't make an album since late 60s and they're still very discussed. Hey triggered dumbass, filter these threads and get a life.
Hudson Anderson
Here
Brandon Morgan
I'm talking about the aesthetic quality of the post, which is subjective. The actual quality of discussion can be measured. There is no rule that aesthetic quality is required in posts, since that's subjective. The mods have never banned a thread because they thought the image looked bad until grimesthreads, which only goes to prove their corruption
But posting a shitty picture meant to improve her image with the same copy-pasted text is quality? This is some next-level denial.
Ian Barnes
>defame we talked about why posting an ugly picture of grimes on Sup Forums can never be considered defamation like two days ago. you are so immature and ignorant that you completely block out any information or stimulus that doesn't uphold your delusional view of the world. you are actually no different than pic related.
and since this comment is also going to be damaging to your fragile ego, i'm sure you'll conveniently repress this as well.
blindest is he who does not wish to see. and you user, are blinder than a bat.
Jose Rogers
>well before this one by like 30 minutes Bad timing for your shitty trolling thread. You posted it too soon; the other one didn't even reach the bump limit at that time. You're not only dumb but you also brag about it.
Elijah Harris
>saying that a thread has no purpose to exist in that thread counts as contributing to their lack of purpose, even though you're at least trying to change something Wowie
Robert Perry
See If the thread is still active after the thread hits bump limit then it is breaking no rules at the time
Christopher Collins
This so much, this guys keeps repeating same comments and arguments day after day although being proven wrong on them so many times. This thing about defamation is an excellent example of that, he's still wrongly using it like a deluded autist.
Joseph Thompson
END OF ARGUMENT. people are allowed to post ugly pics of grimes all thy want. they just can't have more than one thread about it at the same time.
Jayden James
"anti-trolling" grimesfags officially BTFO'd
Levi Butler
But threads with ugly pics that were put after the previous general died have also been deleted with the same justification. I think the justification might just be fake
Jack Walker
>of course the mods never delete those threads because they've very much decided to pick a side. WTF are you talking about? They deleted plenty of side threads from both camps (haters and fans).
FILTER HER THREADS, YOU DIP, AND STOP WHINING.
Luis Richardson
Geez when did people on Sup Forums become such pussies? This is becoming pretty lame. They do criticize her music, it's usually rebuttal-ed with "WELL THEN user YOU DO NOT GET IT."
John Smith
>have also been deleted with the same justification that's because this thread was made as soon as the previous one hit bump limit. either those threads were made before the previous one hit bump limit, or after this one was made.
Anthony Martinez
>using a retarded meme term like 'grimesfags' unironically >expecting to be taken seriously
Jaxon Jackson
stop arguing. op said to be peaceful
Logan Foster
i just hate her
Connor Rivera
You post a lot of crap whining like a crybaby. YOU ARE STILL WRONG. Period.
Jaxon Richardson
>he concentrates on 'grimesfag' part of my post because he can't refute the content of my post
you're pathetic, classic music faggot
just leave Sup Forums already
Dylan Morales
thread/
RIP crybaby user
Owen Barnes
You troll were BTFO by mods. Justice has been served. May your shitty thread burn in hell.
Ian Powell
>getting offended over a decade old meme
I'd call you a newfag now, but you'd probably be very confused by the meaning of that term so I'll spare you this time.
Juan Torres
>oh look, he repressed and ignored another thing that could potentially undermine his ego blindest is he who does not wish to see. and you user, are blinder than a bat.
Luke Morris
The most mature argument ever written on this site. I'll screencap this and print it and frame it.
Aaron Rivera
>although being proven wrong on them so many times Proven wrong by whom? You silly haters? HA HA HA HA HA HA!