What would happen if a sun made of ice would collide with a normal, lava-made sun? Both suns would be the same size and ice-made sun’s temperature would be -1000 degrees of celsius and normal sun’s temperature +1000 degrees of celsius.
Would their combined effects cancel each other out so that instead there would be only empty space or one 0-degree sun?
SAGE
Except the sun isn't made of lava?
on earth, -1000 degrees isn't possible. it might be different in space i don't know. so this hypothetical makes little to no sense
>normal, lava-made sun
It deppends. During the day or at night?
What would happen if a sun made of ice would collide with a normal, lava-made sun? Both suns would be the same size and ice-made sun's temperature would be -1000 degrees of celsius and normal sun's temperature +1000 degrees of celsius.
Would their combined effects cancel each other out so that instead there would be only empty space or one 0-degree sun?
Would their temperatures cancel each other and leave only empty space, or would they leave a zero degree sun?
If it's made of ice, it's not sun, it's a planet.
Suns aren't made of lava, they are made of plasma, created due to thermonuclear fusion in sun's core.
If this hypothetical scenario happened, the icy planet would melt before reaching the sun.
listen newfag baby, you can't claim sage and the post an image with your post, it just bumps the thread anyway
nope, for celsius the minimum possible anywhere in the universe is -273.15 Degrees celsius. its called absolute zero.
this man isnt just a faggot. this man is a retarded megafaggot.
>pic related.
I would hazard a guess that he meant two extremes of absolute zero vs hottest possible temperature.
First, -1000° is tecnically impossible, at -173 °K (the "absolute zero") teoricaly particles stop moving i/o vibrating, so all stops and u can't get below that temperature.
The ice would melt and the water would turn the lava sun to rock.
-273°K, sorry, autism kick in.
... i really hope your joking.
>-173K
0K or -273C, moron
yeah. still kelvin m8
autism is still there, it's -273C lol
0 K or -273C, champ.
just travel away from sun at 8 minutes per hour
It would happen that both suns would collide in your anus and make you even more pathethic than you are after you brought up this thread, faggot.
Don't forget to kys
273.15C
ACSHUALY
If particles stop moving how is the Big Crunch still a plausible theory
I'm gonna try to go along with what you're saying. The ice "star" would be melted from the immense heat of the sun, and would probably disappear, I'm not an astrologist, so ask an astronomer.
what if your mom wasn't related to your dad? op you faggot crack a book.
I don't know man. Is it really possible to be at absolute zero?
i believe the big crunch has been discarded as a theory. But otherwise you are talking about Entropy, a whole different theory.
There would be night on ice sun and day on lava sun.
I think theoretically, the big crunch could happen if the energy making the universe expand becomes less than the gravity pulling it together, so if there is energy < gravity, then the universe would collapse. Hense the name, "big crunch"
there is no -1000C
if two objects the size and mass of the sun collided regardless of their composition they would both supernova leaving behind a neutron star, possibly in binary orbit with a white dwarf.
I may have explained that badly.
They never stop moving
well, technically it is, but we could never create it and our whole civilisation will be dust before it ever occurs in nature.
I don't think it is possible for any particle to be at 0K because of pic related
That completely depends on the angular size and distance. If the celestial coordinates of the asterism create averted vision, the circumpolar collimation and the declination of the parallax meridian would result in a retrograde zenith with and eccentric ephemeris.
I hope this answers your question clearly enough.
the big crunch could only happen if the universe stopped expanding and began to retract, or continued to expand while being spherical in shape. evidence doesn't support either conclusion, the universe is flat and expansion is accelerating, unless something changes that the universe will end in heat death.
> come to Sup Forums for cheap porn
> faggots trying and failing hard at science
> mfw I'm having more fun than with porn
what would happen if OP wasn't a faggot?
The ice sun would be vibrating back in time
0K means 0 energy which means entropy = 1 which means it's not matter which means there is no particle being observed.
Thanks for clearing me up on that.
so that raises the question. can empty space be observed as a certain temperature?
so your not going to touch on the -1000 degrees, sun of ice or normal, lava-made sun?
Would burn hotter as water from ice would ionize and hydrogen from water begin fusing.
literally everyone in this thread has the same understanding of physics as a starfish
What about a sun of lava vs a sun of steel beams? Would they melt?
>What would happen if a sun made of ice would collide with a normal, lava-made sun?
What would happen if OP was not a fag for once?
The gibbous nature of the messier object renders such concerns moot. If the right ascension of the planisphere is in transit, the transit conjunction is Dobsonian.
truly empty space with no detectable matter would be 0K
>Lava made sun
Welp, that's my chuckle for the day.
What about if I fill my room with vacuum and put duct tape around the door so no air can come in?
Can I use it as a freezer where I can just let things float around?
Nice thumbnail
they would merge into an even larger sun made of steam, obviously
assuming your room is still on earth and made of standard residential construction materials, heat and atmosphere would eventually reach equilibrium in your room. you'd probably have suffocated before then however.
Seems like a lot of clever folks in here.
I don't know anything about physics so please educate me.
Is speed of light a constant or does it change depending on the observer?
I mean, if I were to travel at near the speed of light myself then my clock would tick slower than someone on earth. So the distance light would travel would be different for me than for the observer on earth, no?
and more
if something had the mass of the sun, if it's made of particles lighter than iron, fusion would start and it would be a normal sun,
no matter the contents (unless there is little hydrogen, in which case it would become a red giant and then become a white dwarf when everything is iron or heavier)
The center of a sun sized object, even made of ice, would be under so much pressure that it would literally become a regular sun.
/thread
>/threading yourself
XD
> XD
...
That's already happening. That's the reason everything seems to be moving away from us at the same speed in every direction. Everything is actually staying in the same place but it's shrinking.
At short distances, the gravitic, electromagnetic, strong, and weak forces hold everything in relative position so everything shrinks in-scale, but over extremely long distances inertia wins out so the universe isn't moving back to a central point (yet) but everything in it is shrinking constantly.
I can only assume Einstein danced around this much more plausible theory and came up with that silly balloon analogy because he knew what would happen to society if everyone found out the entire universe is already over the hump and on its way to an end.
Yeah OP is a retard
Of course it would obviously make Earth since the ice would melt and cool the lava into rock and the ice would turn into water so it would just make a planet
...
Empty space doesn't exist. The gluon field is everywhere.
The collision itself would generate mass amounts of heat. Just a consideration OP.
-273.15 C°*
Do you guys have Alzheimer or something
i guess you are missing on the many chemical reactions that would take place.
...
>mfw
>Do you guys have Alzheimer
Not that I recall, no.
I'm considering it.
The giant ice planet would mostly melt before it touched the sun and whatever is left would create a lot of steam as the actual sun continues on it's normal path.
Are you high or something
I bet you are fun at parties
According to Einstein it's constant, but that is a contested assumption in physics today.
I am well received at festive gatherings.
Nope.
Give me any other plausible explanation for every object in every direction moving away from us at the same speed.
If everything in the universe were expanding, the things that are on our path (between us and the center of the expansion or farther out from us) would be redshifted less than objects on the other side of the expansion. Objects that are not on our own path would redshift more because they'd be getting farther away as we both move away from the center of expansion. The redshift happening uniformly in every observable direction can only mean that the distance between all objects is increasing because the objects themselves are decreasing in size (including the ruler that we use to measure that distance).
>i believe the big crunch has been discarded as a theory
Are you a "MORAN" or just an idiot?
measurements show expansion is speeding up, Einstein actually refused to believe this and called it his greatest mistake.
I'd talk to you
in theory yes but there is no place we know of where it has been done
I'd check em
What are you on, and why aren't you sharing
The ice sun would inmediatly collapse into a normal Sun (yet smaller than before) because of gravity. Then, assuming it is pure ice (H2O only) it would start fusion of the hydrogen, which is pretty easy to fuse. It might even fuse some oxygen. Then, the impact would release quite a lot of energy tbh
the speed of light is constant, but it seems to change depending on the observer because the flow of time changes. Since speed is a function of distance divided by time, varying the rate of time passing changes the apparent speed of light but not the actual speed of light.
how can nuclear fission happen below the absolute 0 point?
Everything is accelerating.
We are accelerating away from the things closer to the big bang and shit further away from the center of the big bang is accelerating away from us. Hence it looks like everything is moving away from everything.
There is no center of expansion, because the center is literally every point in the universe
shc of water = 4.18 J/g C
shc of silicon (assume lava is made of silicon) = .75 J/g C
Masses are equal, so they factor out.
4.18 / .75 = 5.57
2000 C (heat difference) / 5.57 = 359.06 = heat gained by water.
So the whole thing becomes a ball at temperature -1000 + 359.06 = 640.94 C
Trump Science Committee member detected
>expansion is speeding up
No, COLLAPSE is speeding up.
0 k is max idiot
...
>Velocity not speed
I am god
hehe you just got trolled
-273.15°C * actually
>the center is every point in the universe
Get this crystal crunching new age bullshit out of my theoretical physics discussion.
...
Velocity is speed along a given trajectory.
We're not talking about specific trajectories here, so your attempt to sound smart has failed.