Half-Blood Prince>Deathly Hallows Part 2>Order of the Phoenix>Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them>Philosopher's...

Half-Blood Prince>Deathly Hallows Part 2>Order of the Phoenix>Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them>Philosopher's Stone>Chamber of Secrets>Prisoner of Azkaban>Deathly Hallows Part 1>Goblet of Fire

Literally impossible to refute

Fantastic Beasts and where to find them was decent

Creedence did nothing wrong

ONE OF THE DULLEST FRANCHISES

what a shit opinion

here is the non contrarian patricians choice:

3>1>2>&>6>4>5>8

...

>Prisoner of Azkaban that low
>Fantastic Beasts that high
>Order of the Phoenix that high
0/10

(You)

Considering your roles after being in one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises they should have killed you. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

That's pretty simple, they all rank in the category of "easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises." Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

why did they mean by this?

Memes aside, this is one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

This shit is the same as Star Wars and the latest brand of Marvel and DC crap. And that is dog shit. Nothing can compare to the Lord of the Rings. The introduction in FOTR shits on everything in all the SW and HP films put together.

>haven't watched harry potter movies
>still know that azkaban is the best one and goblet of fire is the worst one

6,7,3 best
im fan and cant decide which is the worst

Correct, but you have to remember that SW was always garbage and the man children became the critics which is why its praised

>PoA
>first
I want this meme to end

This > H.P. movies

>SW was always garbage

This is more apparent now that it ever has been. The original trilogy is completely meaningless and it's legacy has been tarnished far beyond repair thanks to the vapid greed of it's creator. There's no reason to put the originals up on a pedestal any more, the magic has been wrung entirely out of them, Lucas has ruined them with his CGI enhancements.

And aside from all that, the future of SW should have been apparent with RotJ, the first of the movies to truly give way to commercialization of the product that we later saw all over the place with the prequels, where Lucas realized he could wake boatloads more money pandering to kids to sell toys and comic books and shit like holiday specials.

>My Immortal
It's a pity that masterpiece was left unfinished, it's the best thing to come out of fanfiction.net

Good taste

I'd put 5 up in the Kino list too

mmm, delicious pasta.