Now that the dust has settled, who was in the wrong?

Now that the dust has settled, who was in the wrong?

I like all these harry potter threads

me too, ootp is so underrated

harry. he didn't bow and he didn't shave his head for his meeting with voldemort.

...

JK ROWLING for creating one the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following his pals and him from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

...

...

I loved all the little moments where it got creepy and a little bit more crude. Overall this is the perfect blockbuster saga, not high art but not brainless like transformers and the recent flicks

...

>brainless like transformers
Found the facebook movie buff. Bay's Transformers series is pure vulgar auteurism art

...

Half of them are art though.

...

...

...

...

...

i swear you get lazier and less creative with the intro every time

...

...

...

...

...

...

>this retard posting his garbage memegrid images again
Go back to Sup Forums, /lit/ or /r/harrypotter 2016

>NOOOOOOOOOO FLYOFDEATH STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOP ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH IT HURTSSS
WTF I hate flyofdeath now

They arent mine, you're still complaining? Kek, stop coming into HP threads

>dey aint mine but i'm gonna post them over and over even though they're uninspired hogwash
Yeah I'm going to complain because they're fucking trash. Get a better eye if you're going to make grids

>doesnt deny it
Stop coming into harry potter threads and crying like a girl you autist

Few copypastas even bother.

Nice grids

Get some taste and a better eye you pleb scum. Your fucking images have some great fucking shots and you're too dumb and cinematically uneducated to rearrange them to work and flow.

fair enough, I admire this shitposter's commitment at least

They arent mine faggot and they look better than most, because every shot is good

Made this as dark as possible.

...

bump

The scene where they burn Hagrid's cottage is kino as fuck.

this one dudes just standing there clapping what

>"Yes, I'm the Half Blood Prince"
cringe kino you mean.