The New Universal Monster Universe™ - can they pull it off Sup Forums?

Upcoming

The Mummy
>Directed by Alex Kurtzman
>Written by Jon Spaihts
>Starring Tom Cruise and Sofia Boutella

In development + Rumoured Casting

The Invisible Man
>Written by Ed Solomon (Now You See Me)
>Starring Johnny Depp

The Wolf Man
>written by Aaron Guzikowski and David Callaham (The Expendables)
>starring Dwayne Johnson

Creature from the Black Lagoon
>written by Jeff Pinkner (The Amazing Spider-Man 2)
>starring Scarlet Johansson

Frankenstein
>starring Javier Bardem

Bride of Frankenstein
>written by David Koepp (Jurassic Park)
>starring Angelina Jolie

Van Helsing
>written by Jon Spaihts (Prometheus) and Eric Heisserer (Arrival)

Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
>starring Russell Crowe

Other urls found in this thread:

variety.com/2015/film/news/bride-of-frankenstein-reboot-writer-david-koepp-1201657896/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Tom Cruise
>Johnny Depp
>Dwayne Johnson
>Scarlet Johansson

Those big actors on the main roles are literally the only reason anyone would watch those and the studio probably knows it after Dracula's failure.

Audiences have absolutely no interest in this particular material these days, and it's a very thin ice to build a cinematic universe upon. There's no hype. They force people to watch it through established hollywood stars. That's a negative balance.

Take Marvel or Star Wars, for example - those things will be profitable for quite some time even if they cast absolute nobodies, even more - they actually make new stars out of people they cast. That's a positive balance

Who asked for this?

i have the weirdest boner

Is it possible to have a mummy bondage fetish
actually never mind

Universal executives looking for something they own that can do capehsit numbers

What are they hoping to achieve with this? Monster Squad 2?

>The Invisible Man
>>Written by Ed Solomon (Now You See Me)

Ha, clever

is that bad pussy

I'd rather see Tom Cruise in a Fast and Furious movie than this shit.

None of those actors besides Cruise and crowe are even confirmed yet

>Dracula's failure
And the Del Toro Wolfman and Van Helsing. They haven't been having much luck lately.

will never do iron man numbers

So it's Penny Dreadful, but with jokes.

I honestly think the Mummy will do well. If it has Tom Cruise, decent special effects, and quippy, it will be a good start.

just i dont see how any of this other shit is going to stick

johnny depp is not a draw if he's not in a pirate costume. Angelina Jolie is not a draw anymore.

The only other real draw is the Rock. While I am personally interested in a Javier Bardem Frankenstein, the shit Universal will probably come up with will be eye rolling.

If Ghost in the Shell flops and Creature from the Black Lagoon flops, say good-bye to stand-alone black widow movie.

>If Ghost in the Shell flops and Creature from the Black Lagoon flops, say good-bye to stand-alone black widow movie.

ScarJo won't be fit for those roles in a couple of years anyway, she already looks laughable in action

(((((((((((((((Kurtzman
Spaihts
Solomon
Guzikowski
Callaham
Pinkner
Koepp))))))))))))))))

(((jesus christ))) that's a lot of jews.

most excited for Black Lagoon relaunch desu

with that writer and ScarJo, really?

>Tom Cruise
>Johnny Depp
Have become such parodies of themselves that films which had the potential to be great in their own right became forgettable, generic vehicles for both actors.
>Scarlet Johansson
This maymay needs to end. She's a horrible actor and her charisma/sex appeal/whatever is grossly exaggerated.
>Dwayne Johnson
Always going to be catchphrase wrestler who went to Hollywood. Good for mindless action and comedies but that's it.

I don't mind scarjo but the writer is shit. I just meant Id like to see a new take on the story, not necessarily the take outlined in the OP

somehow sadder than making live action childrens cartoon classics

>tfw you realized Marvel completely destroyed the movie industry as everyone scrambles to make their own tryhard cinematic universe and adaptations

so are they just making every fucking monster a female now to please the screaming vaginas?

Can't wait for the update of Hunchback of Notre Dame

>universe helmed by Alex "The talentless hack's talentless hack" Kurtzman
>not Guillermo Del Toro

So the spoopy mummy is a qt now?
I like where this is going.

It's not that there's no interest. The execution is just shit. The movies always seem dated and 3 years behind the curve.

Wow, talk about your perfect casting...

is there porn of a hunchbacked woman getting fucked?

>Guillermo Del Toro
>Not a hack

Ok.

How do any of these things connect at all, and why would there be any cross-exposure outside of like Dr. Jerkyll being behind multiple of them?

Seems like a huge clusterfuck of ideas with no direction

Who under the age of 60 even likes these old-timey monsters anymore?

Answer: Fucking Nobody

Do they not understand that the point of a cinematic universe is to establish the structure upon which likeable characters can be put together in teamup movies? How the fuck do they plan to do this when the movies are all based on the inhuman villans with whom we are inherently not supposed to be able to relate to?

This whole thing will be an unprecedented flop and Universal will be kill once and for all.

why is this so arrousing

>why is a fit attractive woman arousing
Faggot.

i'm a girl

Sucking dicks doesn't change your chromosomes, dude.

just give me some good vampire moviers pls

>The Wolf Man
>starring Dwayne Johnson

The fuck?

Villains you say? What if those villains were used to do some good?

>So that's it huh, we some kinda Monster Squad

>old-timey monsters
no appreciation for cinematic history, ground-breaking makeup/effects, or classic monsters.
opinions invalid

>It's not that there's no interest. The execution is just shit...

Penny Dreadful was brilliantly done, but it had little interest.

>Bride of Frankenstein
>starring Angelina Jolie

this is the meme post, right?

they better not even think of re-making this kino

Im a bit disappointed they are no longer using Dracula Untold.

I feel like it could have easily have fit in with the tone and setting of this universe, especially after seeing the trailer for The Mummy.

I wonder how they even plan to make them team up, or give them all a villain to team up against. You literally cannot reuse the same villain in these cinematic universes

In most cases the villain is the only selling piece of the IP, not the hero who defeats them.

>Sources tells Variety that Universal wants to offer Angelina Jolie Pitt directing and starring gigs in “Bride of Frankenstein.”

variety.com/2015/film/news/bride-of-frankenstein-reboot-writer-david-koepp-1201657896/

Apparently a remake was being worked on but was scrapped. Most recently Shane Black spoke about a sequel as being a fun idea.

Sure the patricians on Sup Forums are aware of these things, but to normies they really are just Old Timey Monsters.

Wasn't Charles Dance's Master Vampire/Caligula going to be either the main villain or Nick Fury type character in the universe? This was before they decided to drop Dracula Untold from the universe and reboot again obviously. Now it seems like Russell Crowe's Dr. Jekyll may fill that spot

They're remaking The Wolf Man AGAIN?

Yeah that's pretty shitty casting, what the fuck?

Mr Hyde is pretty boring in comparison to the other villains, even if Jekyll holds the universe together

That movie was dogshit. The only good part was the Intro.

>implying they can top Brendan's Mummy
>implying they can top Wolverine's Van Helsing

that's the worst impalement i've ever seen, how would this even work?
Poles magically springing out of the ground? (please don't tell me that this is an actual thing in a movie)

>Poles magically springing out of the ground?
Or they stuck them into the ground.

no it's gazelle from Kingsmen

This sounds like absolute pure fucking garbage

This was the least offensive of all the recent remakes, monster movies and universe starting flicks. It had some good actors, strong visuals despite mediocre CGI and a couple of cool concepts. I was actually ok with seeing more Bard Dracula.

This. I actually enjoyed it.

>classic horror characters
>made into action flicks with the likes of Tom Cruise and The Rock
Blech.

It probably wouldn't be so bad if there were anyone under 30 who didn't suck.

Tom Cruise is a decent actor and has done some great stuff over the years, regardless of his real life personality or religious beliefs.

>Directed by Alex Kurtzman

It's dead Jim.
I'm a retard and just by looking at that name I know it's shit. What does this say about Hollywood?

>all those literal who writers
Damn they're going for bottom of the barrel now

I liked Van Helsing.

*BRRRRAAAAAPPPPPLPLPLPLPL*

You don't understand my point, most silhouettes in the webm, aside from few correct ones just have poles spiking through their chests or bellies - that can happen only if you just randomly drop them on a pole from a height or if pole rondomly springs up with a sufficient speed. The whole point of impaling as an execution is moving a pole through the whole torso of a still living person starting with their anus. This shit is universal for any culture that had ever practiced impalement

Yes my son. That right there is some bad pussy. Good just very naughty

It makes the Turks look like weak puppets in the webm. I guess that was the point. The movie's visuals are somewhere in between 300 and Macbeth in terms of stylization.

Why was this allowed?

>you now remember all those torture chambers from Amnesia: The Dark Descent

Amnesia should be adapted into kino

It just shows how monolithic and dull blockbuster filmmaking is.

Universal has this rich history of iconic horror movies and the only way they can get their heads around remaking them is to turn Dracula into 300, The Mummy into Mission: Impossible, Van Helsing & The Wolfman into superhero movies, etc. etc.

And the worst part is that financially they're probably not even wrong to do this. If they made straight horror movies the audience wouldn't be big enough to justify the cost. The Mummy would be capped at like $100 million domestic gross instead of the $200+ million Tom Cruise Mummy: Impossible could conceivably gross (but won't because it will be a piece of shit).

This

We already had these render well recently wtf

Why don't they just make new monsters

no built in brand recognition

>All these hack directors
>All these near has beens

Will barely sustain itself and fade away in a few years.
Should have been smarter about this and giving the whole universe to a visionary director who loves the classics to set the tone. Someone like Sam Raimi. Cast rising stars and unknowns, with the occasional cameo by a distinguished actor instead of "stars".

This. Why get Alex Kurtzman of all people to create your cinematic universe?

I don't think there's any interest. People right now seem to be going for lighthearted action movies with lots of quippy dialogue that they can bring their young kids to watch. These movies can't use that formula without ruining the tone set by the subject matter itself.

I'd be surprised if even two of these movies got made after the Mummy. Maybe that's even being too generous. Also casting the Rock just seems lazy. I like him but he has like 30 movies on the horizon, fucking stop.

why not just reboot the league of extraordinary gentlemen

user...

Wasn't Max Landis' Frankenstein supposed to be part of the Universal MCU or whatever? I kinda doubt anything will come out of this, tho this new Mummy with Cruise seems fun.

no, that Landis one was made by Fox

oh fuck no, there aren't enough interesting female protagonists in literature.
you get what you wish for i guess

what do you mean? You are a king, do whatever the fuck you want nigga

My nigger, that movie is a great guilty pleasure

CUT MY WRISTS AND BLACK MY EYES.

Guaranteed flop.

The fucking comic is female centric.
The lead protagonist is Mina Harker. She's literally the heart and the brains of the League in the field.

The problem is, they're looking at it like accountants. They see these very historic and valuable assets/brands, and they want to see a return on them that is commensurate with their value. The problem is, there's no way to do that without fundamentally changing what the brand is about. It's impossible to make $1 Billion on a straight monster horror movie, so they have to undermine the long-term value of the brand in order to achieve the required short-term RoA.

i don't care, there is way more to be done with a male centric team

That's the sort of shit thinking that made the movie suck to the point of Sean Connery retiring.

that movie didn't even suck that hard, i actually enjoyed it quite a bit

>could make a horror cinematic universe
>instead make a action film with horror monsters cinematic universe
great job guys

Explains a lot.

Penny Dreadful moved slow despite bashing you over the head with foreshadowing.

It made the payoff non-existent.

Lol

>based on the inhuman villans with whom we are inherently not supposed to be able to relate to
Probably never seen any of these movies huh

LITERALLY CAME HERE FOR THIS

THAT PIC IS RIDIC LOOKS LIKE SHES TAKING A FAT OGRE SHART

it was a fun movie

I LIKED CAPTAIN LOO'S SUBMARINE, AND HIS TWIRLY MUSTACHE