Who would win in a fight?

Now, we all know that in a fight Dumbledore would easily wipe the floor with Gandalf.

But what about our Harry?

harry only knew 3 spells, and beat voldemort because of a meme prophecy

You're wrong and not a chance

Well, I've just watched Harry perform the greatest patronus of all time, saving both his past self and his uncle from 100's of soul-eating beings(basically more powerful ringraiths), so I'll have to go with Harry.

Gandalf never did anything so impressive.

DULLEST

Harry knows no offensive spells. Dumbelldoor just incinerates him with his flame tornado spell.

Obviously not the character from one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

I'm asking about

HARRY

vs

GANDALF

Gandalf fucks him just as easily since he's immortal.

Reminder that Sup Forums is exactly the same way Sup Forums was before they got split

/film/ is coming

Gandalf
>shits his pants, gets staff broken and about to be slaughtered by one dementor. That same dementor is later killed by an untrained female

Harry
>Leathers fuck out of hundreds of dementor

Gee, I wonder.

fuck off back to Sup Forums tourist

I like those digits

Go back to whatever board you crawled out of in the last 2-3 years because of baneposting and squidlord, meme parasite

Harry

I've been here for 8 years m8.

>last 2-3 years

so you came to Sup Forums in 2014? Hate bane because you are a redditor trying to fit in?

somebody needs to go back

>I've been here for 8 years m8.
Oh it shows alright
Are you pretending to be dumb to save face?

Gandalf would just cut Harry with his sword before Harry could take his wand out of his pocket.

nice dubs, cool your head tho :^)

Gandalf is a fucking cuck. All he does is turn his stick on like a flashlight and break a bridge on the third try and die in the process.

nice quad dubs

Gandalf would woop the shit out of harry potter and dumbledore.

>Harry knows no offensive spells.

He knows Avada Kedavra.

Oh and sectumsempra

and cruciatus

I dunno, Expelliarmus is pretty overpowered.