Originals that are better than the covers
Ill start
Hurt
Originals that are better than the covers
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
y e s
Dead Souls
Nope, Cash's version is objectively superior. It made it listenable rather than the original shitty song which is pure Hot Topic drivel.
reread the op
>there are people who still think this
lmoa
retard
This. The original is frentic and anxious, vaguely sinister. The cover is just over the top maudlin for the retards who populate Sup Forums
reread the op
reread the op
glass house kiddo
You can't really be this retarded, can you?
Cash's last few albums were mostly covers of more recent artists.
woodstock- joni mitchell
NIN's cover was better I think.
But that does assert that the original is better.
This is the most extreme example of this ever:
youtube.com
This is the best version of Hurt, this is how it's supposed to sound, this is how it's supposed to feel.
youtube.com
heartbeats
no sad guy with a guitar will ever get close to the original
This is accurate. Trent's version (as well as his music in general) is cheesy, moody shit for cheesy, moody teens.
This
This
Johnny Cash disagrees. He literally called Hurt the greatest song about addiction that he'd ever heard.
Reminder
He's just being humble. It would be in poor taste for him to honestly tell people how much better his rendition is.
You're silly.
All the people obsessed with Cash's version of Hurt should like this: youtube.com
youtube.com
I like Marvin Gaye but this version is just so much better
Most originals are better because artists usually aren't trying to one-up the original when they do a cover.
Holy shit I never thought I'd see this posted here. RIP Charles.