How many more?

How many more?

Attached: FD4F7CE0-3CC9-4E8A-AB51-9FF8BD21FA39.png (750x1334, 377K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gunviolencearchive.org/
gunviolencearchive.org
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/16/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/
gunviolencearchive.org/methodology
worldatlas.com/articles/murder-rates-by-country.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Until the mountain of dead bodies reaches the gods

Till liberals get their nazi party tactics of gun banning. This and every citizen who can own a gun legally has it taken away. Also they repeal the right to bear arms. Politicians let this happen while they blissfully ignore the fact this won’t stop criminals from getting guns illegally.

>this won’t stop criminals from getting guns illegally.

Countries that have passed gun laws have incredibly reduced incidents of mass shootings. But you go ahead and keep drinking the kool-aid.

That didn’t stop it from happening.

There will always be more people killing people, you're getting pissy because you think that you understand exactly how to save lives. You don't. If you want to save lives, become an EMT. If you want to help save the entire human race, become a nuclear engineer. If you want to be mad at a bunch of people you don't know and waste your time trying to persuade people who've made up their minds, post here.

Well, it comes down to what you want. A possible mass shooting every couple of years, or multiple mass shootings every day. Because, so far, the US is choosing the latter option.

Honestly not that big a deal. Yeah, shootings happen. In a country of 350 million spread over 4 million square miles of land. At a time where people are radically polarized and taught that violence is a way to get your message heard and to be remembered. And when life has spent the last 10 years kicking you in the dick, who really cares about prison or getting killed by cops?

Everyone has a great capacity for evil. Ever be driving down the street and see a crowd of pedestrians? One little turn of the wheel and you're on national news. That possibility is achievable a million times every day, and sometimes someone takes that opening. Same with mass shootings. "I have a gun. I'm angry at life in general. I'm gonna spread my suffering around because who cares about the consequences."

The problem isn't gun control. The problem is existential suffering. Take away the guns and we'll STILL have horrible tragedies, just the means will change. We'll have mass stabbings like in London, or car bombs, or other bullshit like that.

But while the citizens have guns, and have the means to defend themselves from people in positions of authority, we have negotiating power. No, we wouldn't be able to beat the military. But we could fuck up local law enforcement so bad that the USA would quickly devolve into The Wild West, because it's really hard to have military patrols over all 25 million miles of roads and railways and bridges, in 35,000 towns and cities. One lunatic with a rifle and nothing to lose can end any particular person's life anywhere in the country, if they feel that the benefits outweigh the costs, and there's virtually nothing preventing it except that the status quo is somewhat tolerable and the punishment is somewhat unbearable to 99.99% of people.

nazis only banned guns for jews and anyone else they didn't like. white Germans got to keep all their guns until they lost the war

Attached: download.jpg (275x183, 13K)

Oh shut the fuck up. Anyone with any knowledge of crime statistics knows that it’s a population density issue.
350 Million People in a Country with most of the population (over 50% of it in fact) centered in 5 Major Metropolitan areas. Of course we have some “tragedy” every other day. Statistically it’s a sure thing! There’s 350 Million of us. Compare that to other countries, even the socialist paradises that have banned guns, like Australia (24 Million) the UK (66 Million) and you’ll see they have about as many tragic killings as we do.

I work in JC and the white liberals are still holding Refugee's Welcome signs. There are militant muslim and black and mosques all over. No one speaks any kind of normal english and is basically a liberal shit hole.

ok boomer

>multiple mass shootings every day

why are you lying

Well, those were jews. If the targets remain the same, I welcome every single massacre there is to come.

educate yourself

gunviolencearchive.org/

Because "there's a mass shooting every day" is a greater call to action than "there's a mass shooting about every 3 months."

Technically, a mass shooting is any shooting where 4 or more people are injured. And they happen a lot in poor urban areas. So inner-city violence massively inflates the number of mass shootings.

For what Americans colloquially consider mass shootings, where a lunatic walks into a public place and unloads into the crowd, it's about twice or thrice per year. Too many, sure, but I SEVERELY DOUBT that gun control is A) Achievable, or B) Would have any significant impact on mass killings.

americunts wont get it. nationalism comes with their mothers milk. theyre just like chinese and russians now.

kek
hea using the same numbers the right used to push the "see niggers are more violent look at all the mass shooting they do compared to whites" agenda.

We're doing our best to become North Korea. But our current administration couldn't pour piss out of a boot even if the instructions were written on the heel.

Except for the whole not denying their people basic human rights and agency, thing.

You're hysterical. The United States is in no way, shape, or form, a monoethnic isolationist dictatorship that utilizes secret police to silence and imprison dissenters in reeducation camps.

Attached: v2qhb.jpg (552x414, 37K)

US Population - 327200000
US Area - 9384000 km^2
Pop density - 34

India Population - 1339200000
India Area - 328700
Pop Density - 407

???

If you actually think the USA does this, you're a paranoid lunatic and you need medication.

>The United States is in no way, shape, or form, a monoethnic isolationist dictatorship that utilizes secret police to silence and imprison dissenters in reeducation camps.

I couldn't read this without laughing. I couldn't tell if you're serious or trolling. I won't even mention the christ cult trying to control everything, white supremacy, nor will I mention Guantanamo Bay.

Do you know how often there are honor killings or religious raids where muslims go into the hindu side of town and just start killing people, or hindus go into the muslim side of town and start butchering babies in India? They happen ALL THE FUCKING TIME.

They happen so often they're not even news.

Nicee one...Elon...

Attached: 8531574960405960.jpg (1436x1133, 116K)

Nice gun argument, go hang a Confederate flag off the back of truck

I sense a presence in this thread, who could be behind it?

Attached: 1576036469252.jpg (461x583, 5K)

paranoid schizophrenia much?

pop density of the Netherlands
1,083.1/sq mi

pop density of new Jersey
1,213/sq mi

pop density of Amsterdam
13,300/sq mi

pop density of Detroit
4,878/sq mi

pop density or Paris
63,320/sq mi


k, bro

There is a strong separation of church and state. There are no laws respecting an establishment of religion, even if our leaders overwhelmingly practice that religion.

There are racial supremacy movements of every shape and form in every single country, for every single race. In the United States, they are not a matter of policy, and cultural artifacts in that vein are being unraveled generationally.

Guantanomo Bay is a few dozen people, almost all foreign nationals with ties to terrorist groups, who are generally released and repatriated to their nations of origin after it's been determined that they are not guilty of any actual crimes.

Nigger.

Are you fucking stupid user you realize in country's like The UK and Australia even after the weapon ban gun violence persisted and in the Uk even spiked after the gun ban all one will do in the us is one of two outcomes.

1. We give up our guns and have to re amend the Constitution Wich would take quite a while even then weapons will still remain in the hands of people who just them illigeally, most likely a black market trade will be created like it was when prohibition was in affect and we will still deal with a problem but now we are unable to protect our homes and property from home Invaders,wild animals ect.

2. Instead of handing up guns webuse the Constitution to cite that the government has become corrupt for these amendments have been held self evident since the time of the founding fathers and start a fucking civil war

Gun Bans will go no where it's all so fucking stupid just go home and watch your lefty brainwashing programs oh I'm sorry I mean late night tv

ok boomer

well
Germany wasn't at all like that either before the nazis.
that's my point.
if you think history doesn't echo itself you're a fool.

oh look another one
ok boomer

source ?

If there was forced gun confiscation tomorrow, I guarantee 99% of gun owners would say "fuck that."

After the Las Vegas shooting, there was a federal ban on bump stocks. It was estimated, based on the sales numbers of the manufacturers of bump stocks, that there were somewhere between 50,000 and 70,000 bump stocks in the hands of American citizens. The law stated that people in possession of a bump stock had 90 days to turn it in to law enforcement, or they would be guilty of a felony.

Do you know how many were turned in, across the entire country? 14.

pop density of Tokyo
16,440/sq mi

pop density of Chicago
11,841/sq mi

Till there's no nigger left.

U know it bby

Lmao this guy thinks he is funny
And instead of coming back to what I said with facts and reasons for why you don't agree you just say "ok boomer"

It just proves that I'm right

A sensible post in a gun thread on Sup Forums?

Damn, I should buy a lottery ticket

Statistics
Riots incidence rates per 100,000 people in India during 2012. Kerala reported the highest riot incidence rate in 2012, while Punjab and Meghalaya reported zero riot incidence rates.
Communal Violence in India[283][284][285][286][287][288]

Attached: Capture.png (593x555, 22K)

with guns?
because this thread is about gun violence

>multiple mass shootings every day

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 17K)

Lmao man gotta love the Shitty feds

>educate yourself
>gunviolencearchive.org/

calm down boomer. We don't have any spare diapers for you, and we don't need you staining the carpet.

No, it's about mass violence, with one side of the argument being that guns are the problem.

The other side of the argument is that it's about social degeneration of trust and community leading to mental illness.

>webuse the Constitution to cite that the government has become corrupt

Attached: 1547061789001m.jpg (305x1024, 58K)

You shpuld try reading your links before you post them, shill. Its funny how many of the 'mass shootings' that site records have 0 deaths.

At least put some effort into your misinformation.

All of you leftist pieces of shit I should think.

Lol okay boomer
But anyways

After looking at your shitty stats I can conclude one thing these stats wouldn't change if we banned guns

Since one of the biggest numbers is people who killed themselves it wouldn't stop people from killing themselves none the less and you are complaining about mass shootings only 395 people have died according to your stats from Mass shootings.

Litterally almost all of this are not fun problems they are people problems we will still have homicide
And we will still have suicide without guns
Hell maybe school bombers will become the norm again it would do jack shit

>gunviolencearchive.org
Funny how there aren't any sources.

Not saying it's false or inaccurate. But I honestly don't trust anything that's main demographic is facebook moms. That's just a personal belief.

Also funny how most of the gun violence is in the most minority-filled areas. Crazy.

Attached: 1562881615348.png (1015x1527, 434K)

inb4 you're criticized for spelling grammar and punctuation because you're clearly typing your reasonable and rational argument on your phone.

>gunviolencearchive.org/
You should really work on your reading comprehension. What you're reading is literally a compiled list of all gun-related crimes in 2019.

So far, as of Dec 12, there have been confirmed 395 mass shootings. That averages out more than one per day. There have been 31 mass murders.

Illiterate hillbilly uncle fucker.

tl/dr
ok boomer

Yeah I have stuff to do so Sup Forums on mobile is a lot more convenient then lugging around a laptop

>wikipedia
k, bro

>111 deaths in 2017 from "communal violence"
>39,773 deaths in 2017 from gun related injuries (37% of which are murders)

source
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/16/what-the-data-says-about-gun-deaths-in-the-u-s/

>Muh mass shootings have no deaths
>Thread is about gun deaths

You are literally a comic book character

PROUD TO BE AMERICAN. GREATEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD..

>The other side of the argument is that it's about social degeneration of trust and community leading to mental illness.
never heard that one before
usually it's
guns are bad VS niggers are bad
ah, let me gueaa. ""social degeneration" is a dog whistle for "black and brown people bad" isn't it?

>over 14k gun death from homicide, murder, ect
>zero deaths
being this retarded must be hard. Were you born with it, or did you take classes?

Nah, it will never happen in the US. We are well past the point of no return. Every time liberal media screams “gun control”, gun sales sky rocket. As citizens, we are too armed and too well attached to our 2nd amendment rights. No government or military stands a chance against us. And that was the intention with the birth of the second amendment. Don’t worry. Just keep stocking up on ammo. Only buy weapons that use 9mm and 5.56 rounds - that is what military and police use, so should shit ever hit the fan, you will be able to find and use ammo anywhere.

they were jews

>minority-filled areas
incoming minority fear mongering

>Funny how there aren't any sources.
METHODOLOGY & DEFINITIONS AVAILABLE AT:
gunviolencearchive.org/methodology

Mexico has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, yet beat their own 2017 record of most murders in the world in 2018.

Attached: 1575148146062m.jpg (819x1024, 186K)

So more than 60% are suicides. That's cool.

And if you remove urban areas, what's the rate of incidence of gun violence in the United States?

Oh, what's that? 0.4 per 100,000 higher than Germany or the UK? Wow, that's such a massive difference. Quick, ban all the guns. You were right all along.

Retard.

A substantial number of shooters are white, so no, that wouldn't be a reasonable argument.

Then again, some white mass shooters have deliberately specified that their motivations were because their neighborhoods were fucked up by brown people. So maybe there's a kernel of truth there, but it's still a bad argument.

And yet they're not even in the top 5. I guess "most in the world" has a different definition for you.
worldatlas.com/articles/murder-rates-by-country.html

Turn off fox news, boomer. You're embarrassing yourself.

Nothing is stopping you from moving there, but keep on being a bitch.

because they know how the nazis did it.
they pretend like they don't but they know that the nazis enabled white Germans to have gun while specifically disarming those they deemed undesirable.
and so "minorities bad" will soon be "minorities should have stricter laws than whites" which then becomes what is usually considered a genocide. hard to say if the USA would go that far, but I can guarantee plenty have a boner for just that.

>top 5 are either black or spic

Hmmmm

Ah, the ol' "then git out" response.
Such a classic.

>muh superior white genetics
roll tide

>I'd rather bitch and moan than do anything material to stand behind my beliefs

and 37% are MURDERS
37% is still nearly 15,000 deaths
>but suicides

>remove urban areas
>pic related

Attached: sport-football-footballers-american_footballer-tackle-tackled-smb060117_low.jpg (800x955, 215K)

Not as many that have the boner for "whites bad" non-criminals need to be punished more

a bad argument we hear constantly.
from one side only
repeated like gospel

>o
>k

>b
>o
>o
>m
>e
>r

wut
that's like crazy fringe lefty shit.
they are loud but are a minority.

meanwhile you just provides a shade of proof to the statement I made by using a whataboutery to deflect.
obvious

Obviously they were undermining the meat supply and subverting their tradition over Jersey, the neighborhood recognized a foreign embodiment of the Jewish culture and reacted to preserve the Jersey way of life. This was bound to happen as the collective of Jersey is non-jewish, its defense is to stop the infection from spreading by a young pop and fresh with that street smarts and social awareness. Now Jersey is safe from the Deli-World of Kosher Tyranny.

>undermining
>subverting
>foreign
>defense
>infection

Nice buzzwords there.

To be fair, incidence of crime in black and brown neighborhoods trends a lot higher than in predominantly white neighborhoods. A spike in crime in white neighborhoods as they trend darker is easily explained be a demographic shift, even though it's probably more reasonably explained by the area becoming poorer, which is why and how black and brown people are moving in in the first place.

There's no denying that, once they're there, property values collapse, though. Because once a town is filled with black and brown people, it's pretty easy to identify it as a poor, crime-riddled shithole. It's the cart before the horse, but it is interesting that heavily impoverished predominantly white areas, while still having a lot more crime than middle class or wealthy areas of any racial demographic, do have substantially less crime than white/black mix or black exclusive neighborhoods.

The only corollary that I can think of was this lovely town in Georgia I visited. Was lower middle class, predominantly black, but there was a wonderful sense of community. People kept their tiny houses and yards clean, had community cookouts - it was nice. Maybe I didn't get to see the seedy underbelly, but I got the distinct impression that if there was one, it was very small. Like 16 year olds that break into cars for pot money small.

Odin would be proud

Not if you don't count the urban areas of Germany or the UK
The fact that you have to ignore the data from places where people live to prove your point, all you prove is that your point is nonsense

tl/dr
minority fear mongering ahoy!

>And if you remove urban areas, what's the rate of incidence of gun violence in the United States?
>Oh, what's that? 0.4 per 100,000 higher than Germany or the UK? Wow, that's such a massive difference. Quick, ban all the guns. You were right all along.
did you also remove the urban area in the UK and Germany before making that comparison?

I bet you didn't....
>pic related

Attached: World-Data-pie-chart-United-Kingdom.jpg (1600x960, 137K)

Poverty and crime don't have a strong correlation.

Race and crime do, though. Why is this? It's more cultural than anything.

Ah, but city dwellers don't generally HAVE GUNS. Or at least, they don't own them legally. Whereas rural, roughly half of people have at least 1 gun. But gun crime is virtually non existent in rural areas.

So it's not gun ownership isn't the problem. Population density, lack of community, and political radicalization seem to be far more significant factors. If it was just "There's this many guns in this area" then crime would be much worse in rural areas.

>if you remove urban areas
Vehicle accident deaths are very common, BUT... if you remove all the accidents that occur in roads, then usa has almost the same number of vehicle deaths as Antarctica
Amazing

gg /gpEptju

propaganda?
>let's just ignore all socioeconomic factors which arguably exist currently and definitely existed in systemic form not that long ago.
yep, definitely propaganda

>That didn’t stop it from happening.
But we should build a wall, amirite?

That's blatantly untrue
Why are you making things up?

he makes assumptions
>if you live in a city you're a dirty liberal
>If you're a dirty liberal you won't have any guns

hmm, it's almost as if correlation doesn't equal causation. Crazy.