Alright fuckheads I'm back to answer more science and math questions poorly

Alright fuckheads I'm back to answer more science and math questions poorly

Attached: index.jpg (283x178, 7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencealert.com/a-wild-new-papers-suggests-space-time-is-just-a-product-of-quantum-mechanics
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>is there an end to the universe
was a question that got asked last thread (op bump)
So there's sort of a misunderstanding about the expanding universe theory, that it's like a balloon that's expanding. It's hard to say for sure but it's possible that there is no hard limit on the outside, Sean Carrol thinks that there is a sort of nothingness beyond the universe, just empty space forever, and the visible universe (and presumably, the non-visible universe of matter beyond it) is what's expanding into nothingness that stretches infinitely in every direction, rather than there being an edge at any point or looping back in on itself. There is really little reason to prefer this theory over one that has boundaries or loops back on itself or even exists in a greater multiverse of other universes bumping up against us, but the problem is that none of these theories are likely to ever really be testable nor do they help to answer fundamental questions like where did the universe comes from or why we are here. So take your pick really

why cant i stop jerking off to traps

How a quatum computer works?

Not op but probably 'cause you are a closet fag.

Show penis.

Well you're likely suffering from an internet porn addiction, I know this might not be an answer you want to hear but internet porn is not that great for your brain. It affects your reward system the same way that food, drugs, alcohol, or anything you really enjoy do- by releasing dopamine and increasing the likelihood that you'll want to repeat that action again that released the dopamine. Traps in particular-well that's really not that odd of a fetish. Homosexuality has existed for as long as history has been recorded (and longer presumably) and is a very normal preference to have in the grand scheme of things. You might not even like boys in particular, just boys that look like young girls or whatever.

But really you're not hurting anybody except hurting your productivity a bit, so as long as you keep a fulfilling life outside of jerking to trap porn you can carry on

Quantum computers use a new programming language because their bits are stored on very small quarks, and their information is stored in what's called a superposition.
So where a standard computer stores information as bits, 0's and 1's, by writing on semiconductor which has an up and down position, quantum computers (which require millions of dollars of cooling equipment and a whole facility to run) can store information as an up position, a down position, or an up and down position (the superposition). The superposition is in a state of being both up and down at the same time, expressed as a possibility %, that doesn't collapse until you check to see what it really is. This is a lot of what quantum mechanics is-things being in a probabilistic state until you check and see what they actually are.
um no thanks

are there any penis enlargers that work

The only people in this thread want to see your sissy cock. Get it out and I'll ask about the Master Equation or something.

Was not expecting a pretty straightforward answer about quantum computing in this thread.
Good on you, OP.

You didn't exactly ask a question but I'm going to answer anyway because I'm bored
Liking traps exists on what we'd call a homosexual continuum, and while it would be considered more homosexual than fapping exclusively to straight porn or only having sex with females with no porn at all, nearly everyone exists somewhere on the homosexual continuum and that's perfectly normal.
Is liking traps gay? To a certain extent yes, but it's not fully exclusive homosexuality so I think there is a distinction to be drawn
Yes! I can't answer for the efficacy of pills but mechanical means to stretch your body do work, and I think there's also elective surgery for this as well. But the best advice I can give for penis size is a well balanced (read-eliminate sugar and carbs and eat lots of vegetables) diet and exercise. Exercise helps you lose weight, which can take your stomach size down and actually make skin retract to make your penis size bigger, and exercise is also good for your blood pressure and heart rate-so that your boners can pump blood more efficiently. Not to mention exercise and participation in competitive sports can increase your testosterone, which can also increase your penis size.
Hey fuck off
My pleasure

No fuck you autist. Show your little sissy cock and boi pucci. The tranny lover wants to fap and I just want to smirk and bully.

Ok well thanks for bumping the thread but I really decline about showing you my body. I'm flattered though

Here's a question for you.
What are your thoughts on dark matter and universal expansion being the source of gravity?
If we're on a soap bubble type of universe, and we reside on the inside surface of the bubble instead of the outside, could that expansion possibly be the cause of gravity?

I'm going to take these one at a time, good questions though
Dark matter really could be something we don't understand yet, it's really the result of a logical conclusion from the extra acceleration we see when we observe other galaxies spinning (ie they are spinning faster than the amount of matter that should be there). We've observed excess gravitation in other ways too-such as from when two galaxies have passed through each other, in the way that they behave. So dark matter really could be restated as the excess gravitation problem rather than positing that there is some form of matter that doesn't interact with light (or weakly interacts with light) and does not interact normally with visible matter. Gravitational lensing also could suggest that there is more stuff out there that only weakly interacts with light.
What do I think about dark matter? Well I think that there are 2 possibilities, that either we will find some new scientific method of observation that can interact with dark matter ("find it,"), or we won't. It could be something about gravity that we just don't fully understand yet, although most scientists consider that answer ruled out by this point, but it's still possible that a better theory of gravity will come along that doesn't require spooky phantom particles. There's also a theory that 3 dimensional time can explain all the same phenomena that we attribute to dark matter, but I don't know how well accepted that theory is

>universal expansion being the source of gravity?
I could be wrong on this but I believe that the source of gravity is the higg's boson particle, no universal expansion required. In a universe that was not expanding, would gravity stop? I don't necessarily think so, but I'm not as well read up on the subject as I could be so maybe
>could that expansion possibly be the cause of gravity?
Sorry to give you maybe not a great answer but I don't know. I can read up on it and get back to you

That's all really interesting, thank you for the insight!

no problem. I am working on an answer to your soap bubble question but I am afraid I've showed up unprepared for that particular question but I could have something minor to say about it in a few minutes, not necessarily more insightful than youtube videos on the subject haha

It's all good, it's just a thought I had based on string theory, and how we might exist on the soap bubble's surface

>universal expansion being the source of gravity?
Yeah I think that that is just not what gravity is. I think gravity is a property of matter that is gained by interaction with higgs boson. I haven't really found anything that supports the idea that universal expansion is the reason gravity exists. It's possible that we are in a soap bubble universe with unique laws of physics, and those unique laws of physics have gravity where other universes would not.
If in fact we do live in a soap bubble universe and we ever interact with another universe it wouldn't be great for sentient life I can tell you that, but then again we would have no say in the matter so it's probably not something to worry too much about. Something to consider when you have omniscience and can look at the universe from the outside

A weird thing about gravity is that things seem to be more "real," in areas with a mass and gravity than those that don't.
sciencealert.com/a-wild-new-papers-suggests-space-time-is-just-a-product-of-quantum-mechanics
(somewhat unrelated)

It's possible that meaning itself relies on gravity, and places with less gravity have less "reality," and meaning anchored to them. There's reason to believe that there are a different set of rules when you are on a planet that has gravity than when you are out in the depths of space far beyond the immediate orbit of any star

This may sound like nonsense but I'll see if there's anything to back me up I believe that this is not an original idea and that it came from somewhere

So if we think about gravity as Einstein did, not as a property of matter but a property of spacetime itself which is curved, then maybe being on the edge of a soap bubble is the reason that this "fabric" in the four dimensional space time is curved in this way. However I would say ok, but go to the center of the bubble (as far away and impossible as that is to do) and go measure gravity there and see what happens. If gravity is different there then that would definitely be weird (I shy away from making strong conclusions that only a bubble universe could act in this way, but it would certainly be weird)

There was a breakthrough at LIGO (actually both LIGOS to be accurate) this year proving the existence of gravitational waves, which is sort of a big deal in science

Why Jews have big noses?

I mean speaking scientifically they don't really, there are some that do and this is an evolutionary trait passed down, and I could theorize on it being related to improved sense of smell and improving survival in that way.
Look at pictures of jews and you'll find that while some of them do have big noses certainly not all of them do

why do power transformers hum?

here's a jew girl with a pretty average size nose

Maybe they do have big noses I think maybe they vary from average to big

Attached: iabizyu1inqz.jpg (884x884, 77K)

lots of jews have nose jobs when they are teenagers. especially women.

Power transformers hum because they are causing variation in a strong electromagnetic field by converting power from one circuit to another.

from wikipedia: Electric hum around transformers is caused by stray magnetic fields causing the enclosure and accessories to vibrate. Magnetostriction is a second source of vibration, in which the core iron changes shape minutely when exposed to magnetic fields.

Does the R matrix produced in QR decomposition contain the eigenvalues of the sample population?

'k, thanks, that was better than Dr Karl Kruzelnitski's explanation

Eh maybe that's so I wouldn't say it's my field of specialty in the study of jewish nose sizes
If so then yeah, something about their evolutionary past may have made it more adaptable to have a big snoz for more sensitive smell, perhaps in the areas of chemistry (or predating that, alchemy) or cooking or foraging or some activity that gave them an evolutionary advantage
However more likely jews consider the nose to be attractive and naturally have selected that way

Sorry that's gonna get a big "what" from me and take some research to answer my man. You'll have to be patient a minute I have no idea how to answer that

Alex? Eric? Is that you?

good points user. also, great responses to the previous questions. you simplify the answer in a way that makes it easy for a layman to understand.

Attached: 1576040981308.png (500x832, 494K)

I'm going to hesitantly answer "yes" but I think maybe you put this question forth to test me and the answer you're looking for is I'm an idiot with no idea what you're talking about which would be also correct
Yeah no problem my pleasure (answer was from wikipedia I had no idea lol)
Are we doing process of elimination to figure out my name? No sorry I'm not Alex or Eric you'll have to try like 23,000 more times and I'm not gonna answer any more

cheers and digits observed, I'm gonna go study matrices to be less of an idiot in the future maybe but I'll still keep fielding questions of course

How much calculus do I need to know to do this boolean stuff

I hope I'm around for all your future threads scienceanon.
you sir, are a scholar and a gentleman.

Technically none but it wouldn't hurt to have a year of calculus taken before or at the same time as you study boolean

I may have given the wrong impression from the OP because I am not that educated past differential calc (which I hated) and some 100 level science stuff, a lot of these answers are from wikipedia and youtube stuff
Thanks, I may give off the impression I am smarter than I am but I do like to think about stuff

Why do I feel the need to cough up mucus/ feel nauseated after eating?

Also I smoke mj frequently (3-4 times a week), but every day?

The mucus is from extra saliva that you produce in anticipation of digestion. Salivating your mouth provides several functions, including adding enzymes to the food before it gets digested fully. You also might need to drink more water
What's recommended now for water consumption is that you drink until your urine is a very light yellow or clear (rather than the previous recommendation of 8 cups a day, which was inaccurate and also varied on body size and activity level, climate, etc). So if you're drinking enough water your saliva would probably be less viscous, but follow the urine rule and you'll be fine (and if the mucus still doesn't go away then I think you just live with mucus)

As for feeling nauseated after eating, it's possible you are eating too much at once or any number of other reasons. Poor diet, food allergy, lactose intolerance, even allergy to food die or a reduced tolerance for wheat gluten could be to blame (it's a very general symptom and hard to pin down exactly the cause even if I monitored your diet.)
If you are really having a problem I would suggest talking to a Dr or a nutritionist about it. What do you eat and how often?

sorry food dye not die derp

Thank you for the information OP. I am going to go buy a water bottle Asap.

As for my diet, I am working full time and studying for university part-time, so I am living on pasta/ sandwiches/ and rice and beans. I eat normally a sandwich for lunch, and something heavier for dinner. I eat fast food 3 days a week after night class.

i got one
A^n + B^n = C^n
n>1
go

I have a horrible diet myself but if I'm giving you honest advice, hypocritical as that may be, that diet does seem to be pretty carb heavy. Try to integrate some meals with leafy greens.
An ideal home cooked meal should be half (or more) leafy greens, some protein and (though you don't necessarily need carbs at all arguably) you can have some 1/3 carbs or so. Your diet is kind of dominated by carbs, I understand that eating right is expensive and time consuming but if you invest in a good diet I think it will pay dividends for you in the long run.

Bad food is cheap and good food is expensive. You do what you can afford I understand that. Sugar in particular but also carbs in general have been linked with heart disease, weight gain and a plethora of health problems. You can eat some carbs but I would steer away from eating 90%+ carb diet which is what yours sounds like.
Omega III fatty acids are also very good for you if you can afford them, such as from fish and avocados. One of the best diets as proclaimed by the American Heart Association is the Mediterranean diet, which consists mainly of leafy greens, fish and olives (also a major source of omega III.)
Of course that can be hard to manage in your budget and time, so maybe just try to integrate some leafy greens first. Baby steps.

Go? What are we solving for, or do you want me to plot the equation on a graph

Are we solving for a value of n?

Wow OP thank you for the thorough response. I will definitely try this.

yes

why did we let the bad guys win

Ah you

You got me. Fermat's last theorem I should have known if I wasn't a dumbass

Anyway Fermat's is solvable for n of less than 2, but I could either plot the graph or have to give a specific 3 variables and solve for the last one or else it's infinite solutions

Attached: ohyou.jpg (300x168, 7K)

we are the bad guys

2+2

To be honest I don't really know how to plot A^n + B^n = C^n
n>1
It would be a 4 dimensional graph and I don't really know what that would look like so if you want to wait I can look for better plotting software or you can setlle for this plot of y=x^.05 your call
my pleasure
I'm not totally sure what you're referring to but I think that's more of a historical question than a math or science one
Maybe you're referring to WWII or Vietnam or Iraq and Afghanistan or something, most likely you're referring I think to Adolf Hitler's Germany am I right? (or rather, the Allies who defeated them). I dunno man.
I know it's in vogue to think Nazis were right or something in reference to liberal culture or something like that, but I think Nazis, real Nazis, were kind of dicks and I'm pretty glad we won WWII

Attached: x^.05.jpg (503x512, 12K)

Hah finally one I know
It's 5 right

i got another one

Attached: mathz.png (323x156, 6K)

alright answer me this you asshat; what the fuck is this bullshit where people type the word nobody followed by a colon and then that is followed by some other bullshit I don't fucking get it.

Hm I think I'm pretty safe to conclude I don't know this one, I recognize the sigma though
I may or may not have a better answer in a few minutes

and this one

Attached: more maths.jpg (720x405, 13K)

42

This is a meme of the format
(group of people or individual): (says something)
(Another group or individual, often "me") (says something in reply)
(1st group or individual): (reaction)

So when the meme takes the particular format
Nobody:
(group or individual, often "me"): (statement or action by group or individual)

They are implying that the statement or action came from out of nowhere, it's in reply to nothing in particular
It's often used for comic effect

So in this example it's implying that there is no provocation for the media to "end this man's whole career,"

Attached: 50f.jpg (680x591, 43K)

Attached: ltwin.gif (557x115, 13K)

It's 1 I think
order of operations is PEMDAS so you'd do 1/3 first, then divide 3 by 1/3 (equivalent to 3x3), then it's just 9-9+1= which is 1

you dont know one of the most famous math problems in existence?
it has nothing to do with graphing you dumbass

Suppose you have a map. Let's rule out degeneracies where a country has separate parts (like the continental U.S. and Alaska). Suppose you want to color all countries so they are easy to distinguish. In particular you want to color neighboring countries with different colors. How many colors do you need at most? (Two countries are " neighboring" if they share a border segment that consists of more than one point. If sharing one point was enough to be neighbors you could divide a pie into arbitrarily many slices all of which share the center, requiring as many colors as there are slices).

It's Fermat's I know that
I'm saying that if you don't give me variables to plug in I can't solve (or there are infinite solutions to it)

I could give you just any solution to it if you want

Also I did promise to answer poorly

I think, I accidentally discovered theory of everything. What do ?

four colors
Well you can share it here or you can put it in your PHD thesis or something
If you really do you could email I dunno a famous physicist or something or publish your own paper and try to sell it to an academic journal

burn it

Do you think other forms of life (does not have to be intelligent) exist within our galaxy but our tech isn't advanced enough to explore this possibility? Not saying universe cause that's too broad, just curious on galaxy ideas.

The original question was wrong and should have been n>2

if you can find a solution to that (or prove its impossible) you are entitled to a million dollars

I don't recognize the symbol on the right what's the name of it? Is that for plus or minus symbol or something? I'm kind of a dumbass

After browsing this thread, OP please tell me you recently graduated hs or something.
you aren't just answering questions poorly, but incorrectly or nonsensically

how would you solve the hard problem of consciousness?

Ok...

Particle of light travel from source to destination.
Anti Reverse Particle of light travel backwards in space and time from source to destination.
Anti Particle of light jump from source to destination
Reverse Particle of light delete space and time and gravity surface around it until it hit destination.
All 4 particle live on 4 type of space-time-gravity surfaces that have opersit directions
4 types of particle combile = 0
4 types of space-time-gravity = 0
And I will applied that for understanding gravity.

Would you rather have sex with 100 black holes or fight 100 black hoes?

Attached: xxxxx.jpg (1425x929, 38K)

>the source of gravity is the higg's boson particle
no
higgs boson gives matter mass
the theoretical graviton is the mechanism for gravity but no one has proven it exists

It kinda depends on your theory of how common life is, can it live in the vacuum of space on asteroids/meteors (panspermia theory), or your theory on the Fermi paradox.
My gut feeling is that there is probably life, intelligent or otherwise, somewhere in our galaxy, maybe even in our own solar system (like fossilized bacteria on mars or something)

The numbers involved I just don't think that life is that uncommon and it's overwhelmingly likely that yes, there are alien forms of life we can't find with current technology. But I have not much to back up this gut feeling and it's possible we're just exceedingly rare or the first ones to the table.
Well I don't think I'm entitled to a million dollars, I could plug in a solution for variables given but I can't do much more than that I'm afraid
I may in fact be a dumbass it's true
What in particular gave me away

its a million dollar question for a reason
the greatest mathematicians today cant solve fermi's last theorem

5

Maybe I don't get it but I don't know that that unifies the four fundamental forces
You could run it by someone smarter than me and see what they say I dunno

+- plus or minus symbol yes

>What in particular gave me away
majority of your answers are just you skimming a wikipedia page
which you usually interpret or summarize incorrectly

Explain scalar waves.

>scalar waves.
Not OP
but they dont exist and make no sense in modern physics

I don't know that this is any kind of solution to a philosophical problem at all but I can give maybe an evolutionary biology flavored answer
So a big part of our brains and consciousness I think is the ability to tie experiences with emotional memory in our neurons. You make an emotional response to a memory, especially a painful, sad or hurtful memory, and you get lots of connections between neurons and a strong long term memory that serves as a selecting factor for natural selection.
In other words, populations that learn from tough experiences (pain, fear, disgust, hate, etc.) especially developing fear responses to threats, survive better than those who don't.

Consciousness crept in as a sometimes advantageous evolutionary quirk of having a bunch of neurons firing off based on experience. A thermometer or a clock can't do that, but a person can.

I don't know if that's a sufficient answer at all but it's what I got

Uhhhhhh join gg/KvvR4Xg

That's why I'm interested in them, seen a couple of experiments where they can penetrate a faraday cage, read the CIA report.

Just not a genius or excel at math, might have a shed I dick around in some day and do science stuffs, want to have a basic understanding.

As your can see , if every object take this logic properly we got.
1. Light object bending space-time less than heavy object. For ex. 1 kg falling at 0.98 m/s but time flow is very fast about 100 seconds
2. Heavy object bending space-time more than light object for Ex 1000 kg falling at 98 m/s but time flow is very slow about 1 second
3. We are metumen both object by our flow of time , both object falling at 9.8m/s for 10 seconds

Now think about black holes.
Every black holes ages is just 1 planks unit of time.
And think about atomic level
Every atom around ages .. forever . More than you can imagine
13.8 billion is too short.

Well I've been reading (watching youtube actually) and I think that what is accepted is that gravity is actually the curvature of spacetime

You're right higgs boson adds mass. Which does interact with gravity. So I either misspoke or am a dumbass (which sounds about right)
So either way yeah my b

Attached: fucken.jpg (320x180, 18K)

jebaited
you like reading that wikipedia page on something you didnt know existed until now?

Yeah you caught me, I have no credentials to speak of really and I am skimming wikipedia pages or watching short youtube videos. I never promised anyone great answers to their questions
If you think you can do better I welcome you and gladly you can answer questions if you want

Oh man check mate I totally got jebaited (wtf does that mean)
good job user I guess

Why is 18 the age of consent in the US?

>and I think that what is accepted is that gravity is actually the curvature of spacetime
good job you understand the basics of general relativity
the real question is what property of mass causes spacetime to curve?
and the completely theoretical particles that create this mechanism are called gravitation.

Is neither an option?
I guess I'd try and fight them so I can die and go to the halls of valhalla or something

you used a literal example from the wikipedia article

youre about as smart as a middle schooler trying to fake a book report on something he didnt read

congrats

yeah 5

if a ship has 26 sheep and 10 goats onboard. how old is the captain?