ITT FUCK YOU I LIKED IT

...

I enjoyed the first two, but Jesus Christ the last one sucked.

I liked the first one, thought the second was better, than the third was just a steaming pile of garbage for me. I don't remember anything from it.

Saw them all at my local kinoplex.

liked beyond a lot more than into darkness tbqh

Into darkness is dogshit but I really like the first one.

I really like how Spock is a river flowing with emotions of violence and assault now.

Maybe I will rewatch them tonight. That's what I keep hearing on here is that people liked Beyond better, I just don't see it though.

The first was fine but Into Darkness was just baffling to me. It was basically an attempt to make a Star Trek version of The Dark Knight that's also a remake of Wrath of Khan. Beyond was pretty good desu

As a lifelong trekkie,
2009 was fine.
Into Darkness was dogshit
Beyond was okay.

3>1>2

The second one was the worst one by far. I don't see what you liked about it better than the other two. Just for clarity, are you a fan of the shows? Specifically TOS and TNG.

As generic space action movies with a Star Trek skin they're all right, and I enjoyed them because any Trek is good Trek, I'll even suffer through garbage like Nemesis for the scraps of decent character moments. I wish someone had the cojones to actually make a Star Trek film in the JJverse, with slower pacing, more cerebral story and smarter characters. I don't even mind dumb shit like Kirk's Beastie Boys obsession and Scotty's minion, or Spock being constantly on the fucking rag. Just take what's established and spin it into something that isn't just special effects jizz.

I've seen every episode of every series.more than twice, with TNG and TOS probably being closer to 4 or 5 times each. I've even watched TAS... Some of it

I'm thinking it's because I went into the second one with no expectations, and went into the third expecting a bit more.

From a Trek fan standpoint, I liked the second better, mainly because all I could remember from the third was that it didn't feel at all like Star Trek.

>star trek fans love Wrath of Khan
>it takes an established continuity villain and creates a true intelligent ruthless nemesis for Kirk
>it plays on the relationships between the Enterprise crew who have been friends sharing adventures for decades onscreen
>Kirk losing Spock is a huge gut punch because of the long friendship and comradery between the two
>let's introduce the miranda class starship which fits into the starfleet ship design continuity and style, a contemporary ship for the constitution class

>we don't have any established continuity but fuck it let's just remake wrath of khan
>nobody in this universe knows who khan is or why he matters
>fans of the new movies don't know who khan is or why he matters
>the entire enterprise crew just met one movie ago and barely know each other
>le reverse spock death with kirk when the two barely know or care about each other and are constantly shitting on each other instead of even being respectfully friendly
>kirk resurrected 30 seconds later
>nothing fucking matters
>oh and khan's ship is just a big black enterprise with jaggy shit all over it
>and we smashed it into san francisco better not mention this ever again
>blowing up the enterprise is now mandatory in every movie

fuck into darkness so much

The first half of Beyond felt a lot like a longer, more modern TOS away mission episode to me.

This. Though, the only thing that I don't like about Wrath of Khan is that Kirk and Khan never actually meet.

there was no reason for Kirk and Khan to meet. Theirs was a battle of wits, not bodies.

The fuck are you on about? They met 12 years before.

King Arthur. Critics have lost their fucking minds.

In the movie I mean, you dip.
Sorry, I should've made that clear, user

That movie was shit though, Armond.

Not him, but I was OK with Kirk and Khan not meeting face-to-face. It gave it a much more naval battle in space sort of feel.

into darkness is unironically one of the worst movies ever made

Agree to disagree. I thought it was the most entertaining pure fantasy piece since LotR.

This desu. The space battle between Kirk and Khan is pure kino, I really love how slow paced and "real time" it feels. Feels much more real than watching a bunch of ships zoom around and fire lasers at a cube. It gives both ships so much more weight and believability.

I like that they don't meet, it forces Kirk to try and beat him with wits instead of a pipe.

OFFCIAL CORRECT OPINION COMING THROUGH

1 was good
2 was irredeemably shit and made me want them to stop
3 was awesome and made me want more
all hat shit villains

That says a lot about the shitty movies you have yet to see.

When you turn Kahn into Spock and Spock into a stoic man-child

Comedy kino

It really bugged me how leading up to Into Darkness, they lied about Cunberbatch not being Khan. Just left a bad taste in my mouth.

>Spock into a stoic man-child
>stoic

t. Dwayne

It's basically the "Run Silent, Run Deep" of Star Trek movies. A legitimate masterpiece.

>6" vs 5'11

Would you?

What? First ST was solid 9.5 kino.

Stoic as in the cold emotionless logic was more of a facade than his actual personality.

Reminder that Suicide Squad won an Oscar for hair & makeup over this

KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA[SPOILER]CAN'T STAND IT I KNOW YOU PLANNED IT[/SPOILER]

>6"
tfw im suddenly taller than Dwayne.

...

My point is that in into darkness he didn't even have a facade of cold emotionles logic. He's constantly emotional.

Reminder that pic related was what it won for, and it was legit fucking great.

like the art direction their going with with the remakes, actually quite hyped for star trek discovery because of it.

Why do you have such shit taste?

The first one wasn't bad, but Into Darkness was terrible.
The endlessly repeating "rollercoaster" of HOLY SHIT EVERYONE'S ABOUT TO DIE followed immediately by some deus ex machina shit got old really fast.

I haven't seen Beyond