Only legitimate criticism of this movie is

Only legitimate criticism of this movie is
>Jesse Eisenberg was not good as lex luthor
>doomsday part was stupid

So Martha was perfect and is above criticism?

>Batman: Dawn of Justice (ft. Superman)

Uncharasmatic lois lane sucking up half the movie with her bullshit bullet and survivors guilt story

Nothing is really above criticism, though saying something is might be an effective way to shitpost

>too much justice league stuff
>wonder woman should've had less of a role
>too many melodramatic flashback and dream sequences
>dumb plot devices
>overly stylized scenes
other than that, it's really an alright movie

It felt like Batman was barely in it.

>Jesse Eisenberg was not good as lex luthor
top pleb

USE SUPERMAN TO KILL BATMAN
USE DOOMSDAY TO KILL SUPERMAN
USE DARKSEID TO KILL DOOMSDAY
USE ??? TO KILL DARKSEID

Why was batman even mad at superman in the first place? All that setup to forget about it as soon as he heard his moms name.

That's like 90% of the movie.
The rest are ridiculous fight scenes.

>saying your mothers first name with your dying breath to force a plot point

>DUH X PART SUKED

Literally one of the most 12-year-old plebbest """""""""""""""""critiques""""""""""""""""""""" a person can make about a fucking film.

Kill yourself you stupid pleb faggot.

and her throwing the fucking spear into the water. you can cut all her parts out and it wouldnt change anything. it would make the movie better.

is there a better cut of this movie where they cut out the martha shit and most of jesse eisenberg's lines.
if they added some the ultimate cut stuff and cut out the dumb shit you could have a pretty good 2 hour movie.

No that criticism is fake too. Lex was perfect. Doomsday was good.

>and then he said pleb as he finished his john wick marathon topped off with a night of Sup Forumsedditing

Because Lex made it look like Superman shot some terrorists.
That made sense in Synder's head somehow.

Oh fuck off

>MARTHA
>Jolly ranchers
>A jar of piss
>Character introductions through emails
>Batman being a murderer
>Lois Lane throwing away the fucking kryptonite spear then needing to be rescued right after
>Awful CGI during the entire final battle

>Playing Lex as coked out Zuckerberg rather than cold and calculating manipulator
>Kill off Superman in the 2nd movie he's in after effectively making him a secondary character throughout the whole film.

HE DIED FOR OUR SINS

Building almost crushed a little girl whose parents were killed in a building because of Superman.

Eisenberg was a pretty good Luthor. It was weird, but I prefer getting new intepretations to stuff rather than endlessly retreading previous things

Idk what people expect out if Doomsday. He's not useful as a character outside of being something strong enough to kill Superman. People act like he was done wrong, when Death if Superman didn't even give him an origin story

The dream sequences were fantastic. They make the movie feel seamless and juxtaposition the greatest fears of both batman and superman.

It's weird that people want cinematic universes but don't want movies to have set up between them. Like presumably you guus watch TV shows and aren't outraged when an episode leaves something open for a subsequent episode to answer/pay off.

This is the point of a cinematic universe

>awful cgi
nah it was good. whether it needed to be in the movie at all is another question though.

>Main Villain is not good
>The final third of the movie was stupid

..........

>only criticism
>only

Only brainlets have a problem with the Martha scene.

They're learning...

>USE ??? TO KILL DARKSEID

Antimonitor