What's his best review?

What's his best review?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=exo8uUlvj9g
youtube.com/watch?v=mms8SAoHzz4
youtube.com/watch?v=X1nnNz_Tewk
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>BvS: Screwed the pooch edition

>Doggo dong and The Winter Soldier

Life is Strange playthrough

the one where his brother beat him and he fucked his dog

Cool Cat.
LiS was a massive piece of shit. Please tell me it was him shitting on it.

I thought his story was that his dad molested him and that's why he's the way he is.

Yes, he completely trashes it
youtube.com/watch?v=exo8uUlvj9g

No he says it was his brother bullied him growing up and that's why he sticks dog dildos up his butt:
youtube.com/watch?v=mms8SAoHzz4

DOGFUCKING SUBHUMAN

I liked his GTA V video where he blamed his brother and dad for the reason he was gay and liked fucking animals, even though he was 19 when he decided human penis was wrong and he should fuck animals because people eat meat.

yikes

The biggest contrarian reviewer I have ever had the misfortune to listen to. Will give good movies bad reviews because of petty reasons ignoring things such as acting, cinematography, plot etc.

No it's because he's Canadian

Daily reminder Adam thinks bestiality is justifiable and argues that animals can consent

youtube.com/watch?v=X1nnNz_Tewk

>we hate discussion and just post memes
Hunger Games

But I said Cool Cat.

He is literally the worst video game player in existence and that playthrough proves it. The short edited ones are probably funny, he shits on it plenty; but I watched the full playthrough to avoid the game and he is insufferable

>He is literally the worst video game player in existence
Bullshit he's worse than Arin Hanson.

I'm pretty sure he also said something along the lines that movies made before 1970 (or 1980) aren't worth watching because they're too dated.

That game didn't even have any gameplay in it

this

>gives planets of the apes a shit review because of the fact he thinks talking apes is stupid, makes up points about plot holes which are clearly explained, admits he didn't even pay attention to the movies.

The CoolCat saga is very entertaining

youtube.com/watch?v=X1nnNz_Tewk

youtube.com/watch?v=X1nnNz_Tewk

Reminder that he's a massive SJW, pro-bestiality, communist and believes people should lose their jobs if they're anti-gay marriage.

And still he managed to get stuck for 15 minutes regularly

It's entertaining.

>never mentioned the first point
>source: your ass
>hates life is strange
>shits on Anita
>there's nothing wrong with besiality
>source:your ass
>source:your ass

Just Google his reviews that is your source you retard.

He literally supported Brendan Eich getting fired from Mozilla because he donated $1000 to an anti-gay marriage bill in 2008 you fucking idiot.

D E H H E I S

Proof?
>just google it
Give me videos and timestamps, or you're talking out of your ass.

The one where he goes full
>tfw to intelligent
and only criticizes a movie for how smart it is or how coherent the plot is. Nothing else matters to him, apparently.

Source?

Are you so fucking lazy that you ask other people for proof without doing any research yourself?
>b-b-but muh burden of p-proof
It's not a legislative debate, nobody has to prove shit to you

I bet he voted for Trudeau.

Has shitposting gone too far?

Oh Erik Estrada, where did you go wrong?

Why would I care about proving anything to a blind fanboy like yourself, who's going to defend his honor at all costs on an anonymous imageboard?
If you're genuinely curious, go search Brendan Eich on his reddit where he's argued about it on an AMA, or look at his liked videos history, where he's liked videos condemning Eich.

His review of Zoo (2007)

It's a reddit thang

Walking Dead, most everything else is trash

Yep.

Oh yeah and his Cyberbully review's pretty funny as well.
>I CAN'T GET THE CAP OFF

...

On mobile, can't find it
What's wrong with asking for proof?

youtube.com/watch?v=X1nnNz_Tewk

What exactly is that proof of? His neutrality towards bestaility? When I said that there wasn't anything wrong with it and wasn't what I was asking for proof of?

>his comments on that video

I mean, I don't see how he's wrong.

i thought the same thing but then I remembered he's arguing for the right to have sex with animals. his argument for consent is interesting but it is flawed. consent is not the instrument that is stopping humans from having sex with animals, it is the welfare of the animal and its own right, the concept of cross-species mating and the mental health of the person. animals don't need to form consent with other animals because they're not breeding cross-species nor are they deranged for doing so. humans are much more powerful than other animals on this planet and we constantly exercise that power over numerous species everyday which robs other animals of their own autonomy.