Why the fuck did someone make this film

why the fuck did someone make this film

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Wy-Tfhcx-2k
Sup
twitter.com/AnonBabble

dude, like Art LMAO

to depict serbia

Sometimes you just need to git er done

to be edgy
I can already tell you're American

I told my parents about how i watched this film. Makes me stop dead in my tracks and cringe every time i think about it.

When you want to get some earnings with a low budget, a good plan is to be as edgy as possible, in the hope that journalist and edgy kid will advertise your movie for you.

Why not?

David Spade's best role

Because someone wanted to see what it would be like to get a boner on command.

what's edgier this or august underground?

>mfw he never fucks the schoolgirl

Hey, don't be racist to Serbian culture.

Masonic secret rituals. Don't act like this shit doesn't go on. I'm suprised the director didn't get suicided for making something like this, especially the stuff with the black and white tiles (Mason symbol). Or look at the "one eye" symbol on the poster.

Pier Paolo Passolini makes Salo, a movie about the same shit. Murdered in the streets before it gets released. Kubrick makes Eyes Wide Shut. Murdered before release.

Also, great trailer song.

August Underground imo.
A Serbian Film has some violence and some confronting scenes and so on but it's all very camp and quite exploitationist. I mean the scene where he kills a guy by shoving his erection through his eye socket? That's just funny, you can't take that seriously, no matter how violent it is.

August Underground on the other hand, is not funny. It's not as well made at all, the production value goes entirely into making the gore FX and so on believable (and they are), but the movies themselves are only for the shock value.

Serbia's anthem is pretty epic t b h

youtube.com/watch?v=Wy-Tfhcx-2k

why would the nwo murder them late instead of preventing the films from reaching anyone? and if you want to give some shit like "the nwo likes watching movies about themselves, it cracks them up. they know the public won't ever believe the material they present" then why would they bother murdering the directors at all?

Well, American teenagers still talk about it, so if you're goal is to make money, why not?

But user.... That's exactly what they want you to think...

most posters on Sup Forums are from America you stupid cunt

I know, right? The logic behind the actions of the NWO is almost as dubious as the idea that they exist in the place, it's just crazy

There are documentaries about most countries.

Why would you ever do that?

to try and make someone feel the disgust/horror of war when everyone is so desensitized to violence.

This is the best dude edgy lmao movie you'll ever see.

What would "An American Film" be like?
School shootings?

But Canucks alone make up 70+% of shitposts

>most
No. A plurality yes but not a majority.

slavs are edgy

Are you retarded?

I don't care about whatever your autism spreadsheet is trying to prove. Have some real stats: Sup Forums.org/advertise

Less than 50%. I.e. not a majority. Most posters are NOT American. Now fuck off.

That's not how "majority" works you fucking idiot.

This and Salo just made me feel dirty watching it. I wasn't even shocked by the violence I was just thinking the whole time, why did people waste so much money and effort making this trash?

rampage by uwe boll. it's actually decent.

>30% female
W-what?

>"A majority is the greater part, or more than half, of the total. It is a subset of a set consisting of more than half of the set's elements."
47% < 50%
Most posters on Sup Forums are NOT from America.

I'm not going to repeat myself a third time. Try to keep up or get lost.

And it's very easy to tell them apart.
These statistics are from a board that uses flags. Sup Forums? The board that focuses on American politics?

Sup Forums

>Interests:
>Japanese culture
not
>anime
not
>manga
not
>video games
not
>comics
not

Majority means 50+1
OR
Majority means the largest represented group (where the 40% group is the majority if 40% + 20% +20%+10%+5%+5%)

You can't discuss if you don't agree on the terms.

>Conspiracy Theories
Yes
>Cult worshiping
Yes
>Sick Fetishists
Yes
>LARPing extremists
Yes
>Edgy contrarians
Yes
>Actual psychopaths
Yes
>Furfags
Yes indeed
Need I say more?

So Americans are the majority of Sup Forums then? Okay.

Only one of those is a majority. The largest individual group is not a majority. If you live in a country with more than 2 parties (lol burgers) then the party with the most seats in parliament is the biggest party but not the majority unless they reach over 50%
More accurate

ITT: people forget about the word 'plurality'.

The correct meaning is the first one, the second one is sometimes also wrongly used where plurality would be correct.
Irrelevant though, as his false claim was
"most posters on Sup Forums are from America"
Which obviously implies an actual, 50% majority, that doesn't exist. Would you say "most people on earth are Chinese", even though only 20% are, but they are the biggest group? No of course not, unless you were a total retard.

Most people on Sup Forums are not American. If you take any poster at random, the chances of them being American are less than half. The chances of them being non-American are greater than half.

They aren't, as has been well established.
Think of it like America's changing demographics. In 2050 or so, white people in America will be a minority (less than 50%), but they will probably still be a plurality, i.e. the biggest racial group.

To be fair I had never heard that American definition of the word.

Also it makes no fucking sense considering what the word plurality actually means. A country has a plurality of political parties. One of them is a plurality. What?

>Americans are 47% of Sup Forums
>next are Britbongs at 8%, Leafs at 7%, and Cunts at 6%
>somehow that doesn't make Americans a majority
Tell me how this fits your made up definition.

because someone relentlessly wanted to relentlessly make a relentlessly kino film.

relentlessly relentless sequel when?

>Chinese are 18.3% of the poipulation
>next are Indians at, 17.5%, Americans at 4.3%, and Indonesians at 3.46%
>somehow that doesn't make Chinese a majority

>somehow that doesn't make Americans a majority
Because it doesn't. God you people don't even speak another language yet you still don't know your own.

>Americans on Sup Forums are 6x more numerous than Britcunts who are 2nd on the list
>not a majority somehow
Is this autism?

"Of the countries one can access Sup Forums from, the one with the largest amount of posters is the United States."

Alright, can we settle on this statement everyone?

Sup Forums is an American website, fuck off.

If you knew anything about Bosnia during the 90's you wouldn't fucking ask.

Audiably laughed and still smiling. Godbless you user

Is this the American anti-intellecutalism I've been hearing so much about? You *feel* that Americans are the majority, so it must be true, even though it isn't by any definition?

47% is NOT a majority. 47% is definitely NOT "most people". 53%, that's a majority. If Japanese moot held a referendum tomorrow, on whether we should rangeban all Americans, WE would win, because WE are the 53% MAJORITY.

Be glad you were born in the US, any other country if you didn't know that 47 is less than 50 you wouldn't pass primary school.

Google even goes as far to point out this is the US definition, and you're still wrong.

All american native english speakers would understand his point in a colloquial way but if you're a humorless guy looking to brow beat someone else over strict definitions on an informal forum then I guess you can do that.

From what I remember, the director is a faggy edgelord who felt life in Syria was so bad that he was born into the world already being fucked, thus the whole baby rape scene.

the rest of the movie was based around that.

>Americans don't know the English language so you shouldn't expect people to use the correct definitions of words

If you expect literally perfect speech out of everyone you're going to be disappointed a lot.

There is an essence to what someone is saying and getting hung up on some miniscule detail is just a way to shout over someone else, seek attention, and try to prove your own intelligence because you know what a plurality is versus a true majority.

Its not a smart point, its not generative and important, and it just makes you sound like an angry dweeb my european friend.

It doesn't even have anything to do with plurality or majority as he didn't even use those words.

>88116560
>most posters on Sup Forums are from America
No, most aren't. It's that simple.

>the whole baby rape scene

What the hells is this movie even about?

It's a mockumentry about the Eastern European underground porn scene

It's aaaawwwwwwwwwwright!

I know that user. You used those words and you bandied them about like they're some difficult or enlightening concept that only educated europeans know when in reality the point of his post that americans are the largest demographic of posters here really tells the whole story.

Plus you went into the whole american anti intellectualism rant at the drop of a hat.

Is just really makes me think. I wouldn't want to behave like that to someone I met in real life and it even feels weird to bug some well intentioned poster like that for some country ball roleplaying.

>Makes me stop dead in my tracks and cringe every time i think about it.
Why? It's just a movie.

>N E W B O R N P O R N
>E
>W
>B
>O
>R
>N
>P
>O
>R
>N

...

He didn't know the right statistics, falsely assumed Americans were the majority (probably at least 80% in his head), got btfo on that then pretended to be retarded or that he always meant something else instead of conceding.

...

is this a full house thread now

edgy garbage that signifies nothing has always been a staple of ex-yu "cinema"