Reminder that if you're favorite director isn't on this list, you're a certified pleb.
Reminder that if you're favorite director isn't on this list, you're a certified pleb
Good list
>Quentin Tarantino
>auteur
He is. By any measurable standard he is. You can instantly tell that a Tarantino movie is a Tarantino movie. Auteur does not equal good.
The only superproduction that can incontrovertibly be considered the sole contribution of one man is Griffith's Intolerance.
Posting actual patrician list.
Here comes the Griffisu-autist. Thread is ruined.
mcfucking kys, pseud
Studio hacks are not allowed to be called patrician. 99% of the directors in the OP did nothing of significant worth.
>i hatee griffith so much my faves? everything by orson welles!
t. Pseud
If you idolize John Ford you are actually idolizing D.W. Griffith by proxy. Suggesting otherwise is foolish to the highest degree,
its time to edit that page is see
How can you call someone an auteur when he merely mimics everything done before?
based Paul Thomas Anderson
Oops!!
>no Stroheim
>Béla Tarr
Greed>Satantango
Name something Satantango did new
Griffith invented cinema.
Eisenstein perfected it.
Spielberg killed it.
Snyder resurrected it.
it's wikipedia, have at it
>Eisenstein
you're joking, right?
von stroheim didn't use half-hour-long takes
>using (((kubrick))) to bash on based eisenstein
typical ameriacn director doesn't understand editing and juxtaposition. baka
typical ameriacn director doesn't understand laying down the law of cinema. baka
>Nicolas Winding Refn
hehehe hohoho hehehe hohoho
>Guts shitposting online.
typical redditor transplant doesn't know how to quote the post he's responding to
>griffith is a titan of cinema but if you think the artform begins and ends with him, you need to watch more non-hollywood films
>Verhoeven
>Wes Anderson
>Kubrick
>Bergman
all good
I, too, enjoy the films of Wes Anderson.
>no Jodorowsky