I don't really understand this militia thing...

I don't really understand this militia thing. Are there any movies that explain this well and are good examples of how militia are useful?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9cHLoHou8uY
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Remember the Alamo?

youtube.com/watch?v=9cHLoHou8uY

Basically, and this is just my opinion on the matter, the gun amendment was put into place to protect citizens from tyranny. As an example, look at what is happening in Venezuela. Those opposed to the dictatorship are armless and dying every day without any means of fighting for their liberty, and democracy. If those fuckers had arms, dictators, I guess, would think twice before forcing their unjust regimes.

But here in the US the whole thing has been manipulated in part due to fear. Fear that has been implanted by the government itself. It's no longer about protecting citizens, but controlling them through fear. Buy guns to make yourself feel safer (not that we care about actually making things safer for citizens). Buy guns and remember that we support gun ownership unlike those liberals!

Did hisperic really make these?

So, in case there was some large uprising and people decided to get up in arms and shit, what the fuck are some rinky dink hunting shotguns going to do against proper military equipment? Why are there restrictions on automatic weapons and such?
If they're going to grant the citizens the right to bear arms, why are they limited to weapons that would have absolutely no impact against the largest military in the world?
It seems like a placebo, really. Give them the illusion of control, then watch them get turned into mist by mortars when they try to put it to good use.

10,000 soldiers with machine guns will be beaten by 1,000,000 citizens with revolvers

Because there isn't a scenario where you'd be able to get 100% of the military in support of attacking American citizens. In the event of an actual resistance, there would be defections.

Now, percentage, and how realistically capable of actually overthrowing? Yeah, you're right, likely wouldn't happen. But the idea I think is that preventing that scenario however you can (hopefully by peaceful means), which would mean compromise.

>what the fuck are some rinky dink hunting shotguns going to do against proper military equipment?
Ask the Vietcong.

>The government is making people buy guns in order to protect themselves from the government

OH SAY CAN YOU SEE

...

Look its a another no guns eurocuck thread.Why don't you stop being faggots and get your balls back europoors????

1000000 citizens vs. a bomber would make a rad hole in the ground.

Yeah they really "won". America wasn't allowed to really fight.

Good luck finding bomber pilots willing to decimate an innocent American city.

Die by the millions? Sounds wicked rad, my dude.

...

Those are some amazing sources you have provided for your data from the future that hasn't happened yet.

Why can't we go back to prime Keira? Also she's English and you're an idiot.

Nothing last forever

Just the left one shows enough

>euros
>at like 5am over there

We're aussies you fucking yank

That's besides the point, the same thing would apply to the machine guns you proposed.

I know she's english,and you're a faggot.

aw shit holmes it real nigga hours smash dat like

one party uses a narrative against the other party - context is important

these are the worst forced memes I've ever seen,try harder

The Patriot

It's the flavor of the month meme on Sup Forums though

lighten up. i thought that faces of the united states picture was hilarious

So no guns strya then cunt same difference

>ask any successful insurgency in the history asymmetric warfare
>read: all of them

rolling

>don't look at me hell spawn

rolling

>all of them
Well, at least they have the poor education to go with the placebo guns.

lol

>Amerilards enter war on a lie and get BTFO by Vietnamese rice farmers
B..b...but we had a better KD/R! Lmao dumb fatty

Name a battle that the American's lost.

Winning the battle but losing the war is a really popular saying for a reason americuck

>le military might meme
look at vietnam

and that was in a foreign land

they wouldn't be able to get away with drone strikes on us civilians or wage a proper war against the masses with out billions in infrastructure and property damage, not to mention civillians are packing more than hunting shotguns

Yes it is pretty neat they can lose all those numbers and still win the war and have a greater population density than the aggressors homeland.

Um, user
America lost Vietnam.

There weren't really battles in that war, it was a bunch of random cowardly ambushes on one side and pussy napalm campaigns on the other.

in the end the americuck politicians decided to pull out of 'Nam because they knew down the line they could rule through finance/economics. and it's happening. have you seen photo or been to vietnam between the early 2000's to now? major economic development similar to SKorea and Japan. lots due to japanese banks/firms lending to viets to build bridges and new skyscrapers. same goes for china.

so even though china & vietnam are "communist" they still had no choice in the end to become Westernized anyway and trade with usa/europe. the ZOG easily sent in spies and corrupt puppet politicians to make it happen.

if the americuck politicians of the 70's and 80's continued the war in vietnam, they would risk it escalating to a hot war with china and russia, who were backing vietnam with weapons. where do you think the North viets and vietcong jungle nigs got there guns? they were supplied with the bare equipment and acted as pawns for the larger china/russian powers in that sphere.

also, back in the 1970's and 1980s the news organizations were actually covering all the mayhem happening in vietnam, so that stirred up real public protest against the war. unlike the shitty gay coverage of the wars in mideast by faggots like CNN who don't really show all the carnage. because by the time iraq and later mideast wars rolled around, the ZOG learned they have to maintain full control of the news media. so cnn etc will never fully question the fedgov like past news orgs did.

so what you have back in vietnam war times was very different than now. now the jewnited states deep state is more powerful and isn't afraid of trying to take over the entire planet. there were a lot of subtle cues dropped in Apocalypse Now if you watch it carefully and examine all the details, especially the 3 hr director's cut where they show the playboy bunnies and what happened in that situation.

...which America lost. Because America lost the will to keep fighting.
You think the American military vs American citizens would be able to maintain the will to keep fighting? There would be defections all over.

The situation americans are being put in makes me sad. The tyranny that is being put in place today is not the tyranny that they envision. They're slowly being made into legal slaves by corporations through debt, increasingly bad education, millions of frivolous distractions, contracts that are very advantageous for corporations versus their employees, passive surveillance, expensive healthcare and a widening wage gap and much more. It's a sad state of affairs that their freedom is being taken slowly out of their grip.

America wasn't fighting the Vietnamese people, it was liberating the Vietnamese from the Vietcong and when was the last time you saw a Vietcong in Vietnam?

red dawn the old one

A modern day armed uprising in the United States is impossible without a significant amount of the military joining in. This isn't 1820. Technology has advanced way past the point where your little rifles are going to matter against the military or even PMCs.

Most of you are so fat and beta that it would take years of training to get you into combat shape and you're so soft and pathetic that they could cut off the burger supply line and most of you would be ready to surrender within days.

John Adams.

Vietcong know extreme hardship and died by the millions. Americans are soft and weak and would be ready to surrender the minute they couldn't get a hotpocket and a video game.

frogs in boiling water

its gotta get a lot worse before it can get better

>Whole United States Army
The last time the US actually went to war was WW2. Every other time the US hasn't been able to use its full might because it has to fight a PR war at the same time.

This, pretty much.

No, those are just the coastfags, put there as an unbearable human shield buffer to protect the real americans and keep the immigrants slaving away.

I fucking wish it was a meme.

They haven't won a war since WW2.

Pretty sure things didn't work out too well when the "real Americans" fought the coastal fags.

Russia won WW2. Americans barely did anything.

>they wouldn't be able to get away with drone strikes on us civilians
We're talking about open conflict where these gun rights would actually matter. At that point they're insurgents and not civvies.

they're not memes, i see these mutants on a daily basis in socal...52% is being extremely generous.

The US was barely involved in world war 2 except for acting as a manufacturing stronghold since much of european infrastructure was devastated, but for much of the war they were making out like bandits by supplying both sides.

They won't get close to winning another war until they can end the civil war on drugs decimating their population as the longest running civil war in history.

>dude the military is just going to bomb your back yard what are guns going to do?

Honestly, user, it's a very simple proposition. It wasn't supposed to be a stumper.

That never happened, though, if you are talking about the North vs South, most of the north wasn't on the coasts, the worst coast was barely even involved and nearly half of the southern were made of coastal states.

Grenada, Gulf War 1 and 2, Afghanistan War.
America just sucks did at occupation because they no longer have the stomach for it and because the news is always looking for a gotcha moment.

In WW2 when the US was occupying parts of Germany, a German sniper shot an American GI, so the Americans evacuated the town and reined artillery on it. Once the war is over you can be nice, but trying to be nice and not letting everyone know who's boss isn't going to work, especially in the middle east, a place that has been ruled by military strongmen since the bronze age.
Kindness is basically just seen as weakness to them.

post more rare mongrels

Duh wut ur hand pistol gonna do to stop u fum gettign nooked?

>Gulf War 1 and 2, Afghanistan War.
Pretty sure that's still ongoing, 16 years after the fact.

...

Nice counter-argument, you sound like a special boy.

You realize in the event of a second American civil war, Russia and China would arm rebel groups with heavy weapons, right? They would do anything to destabilize the US so they could clean up once America destroyed itself.

Most of the interior of the US were barely states.

And California sent 15,725 men into battle during the Civil War, more than Alabama Arkansas and Louisiana combined.

Afgan war is because the Taliban never signed a treaty, but the first an second Gulf Wars ended. Sadam's regime state doesn't exist anymore.

The government isn't going to fucking bomb it's own country you moron. Who would they rule against then? The point is the guns would deter authority on the streets. Would people succeed? Maybe not. But they certainly outnumber the police.