How would a 2017 remake of 12 Angry men look like?
How would a 2017 remake of 12 Angry men look like?
Dominic Peterson
Aiden White
12 Angry Men, Woman and Non-Binary Folks
Jeremiah Martin
They wouldn’t be men.
Probably not even allowed to be angry.
Caleb Howard
12 non-binary PoC unpacking problematic issues
Lucas Watson
Fonda's role would be reprised by a Black woman. The old man would also be Black. The immigrant would would be more visually Hispanic. After the racist White male rants about "those people" all the other jurors beat the shit out of him.
Christian Morgan
AYO HOL UP WHITEY
James Ortiz
movie was already sjw, they turned the guilty nigger free
Zachary Morgan
Literally DIN DU NUFFIN
Hudson Murphy
Like the OJ jury
Elijah Collins
the kid was a spic, not a nigger
David Ramirez
Look man, I'm not that type of anti-SJW. I am the type of anti-SJW to point out that beyond a shadow of a doubt, 12 Angry Men remake in 2017 would fucking absolutely focus on something to do with Tumblrism
Gabriel Bell
yes but could you remake it as a soft-core lesbian porno?
Sebastian Cox
Just watched Inherit The Wind and Witness For The Prosecution and I'm in the mood for some more courthouse kino, any recommendations?
Julian Richardson
That's my desktop wallpaper. Exact same image.
Joseph Davis
comedycentral.co.uk
(it's actually pretty good).
Joseph Foster
The Verdict
La Verite
Anatomy of a Murder
My Cousin Vinny (serious)
Adam Lopez
It's a true story about PG&E covering up a toxic field in California.
Jackson Torres
...
Oliver Kelly
WHITE
GENOCIDE
RE.
Michael Jones
>How would a 2017 remake of 12 Angry men look like?
all black
Austin Gonzalez
Breaker Morant.
Colton Flores
Thank you.
Jeremiah Morris
They already did a remake that had blacks and mexcians.
Adam Perry
>12 Angry Men
It already happened, it's called "Richard Spencer's Alt-Right Rally"
Nathan Rodriguez
You retards realize that Murder on the Orient Express just got remade and it didn't blackwash anyone, right?
Jonathan Murphy
The Doctor, they even shoehorned in an interracial romance.
Luke James
Movies like this were carefully made so that they attacked one specific prevailing norm of their time, in this case nativism and racism, while garnering the audience's goodwill by adhering to all other prevailing norms the audience would have had. In this way the movie's message is delivered in a way that doesn't offend the sensibilities of its viewers, even as it tells them they need to change some part of their culture. This makes it more effective as propaganda, but it also has the interesting effect of making it awkward to modern viewers, since the efforts it goes to to avoid upsetting its contemporary audience and gain their trust means it is going to endorse a lot of things that modern audiences see as morally wrong or just odd. There are other pieces of propaganda from a little earlier that focus on different issues and try to win the audience over with racist humor.
That's why this type of movie doesn't age well, except as a historical curiosity.
Leo Wright
In 2017??? You know how it would be....
> all female cast.
> defendant is a white guy.
> almost the same as the original
> one juror fights for innocent, talks almost all into it.
2017 plot twist....
> clever woman figures out in time that the guy really IS guilty.
> he goes to the chair.
Charles Reed
It could have Latinos, indians, and east Asians, but none of the jurors could be black. The bigoted rant juror 10 does doesn't make sense if there is someone of that race in the room. And it wouldnt make sense to rant about asians, for instance, with a black person in the room because black vs white is the main racial tension, it would come off as comical. So the defender has to be black.
Daniel Rivera
Judgement at Nuremburg is also great but very long, worth it though
Logan Lewis
>one specific prevailing norm of their time
>implying the audience was all white
>We were kings and shit, black man