I hate Bat-wank as much as everyone else, but DC at least tries to fix things, while Marvel has become sloppy in that regard, wanking themselves way too much. Marvel's known as the comic company that gives their characters heart and feeling, but reading a lot of their stuff now and wtinessing how they've changed their characters so that the original heart and feeling is nonexistent (e.g. Carol Danvers) is not only against that code, not only makes the actual fans butthurt, but puts a lack of faith in a character that deserves it.
Why make Spider-Man a rich, Stark-clone when his whole appeal is he's just this guy with responsibilities in life? Because they want me to focus on all there other forced characters like Silk or Miles Morales?
People read Spider-Man because they want Peter Parker to struggle as Spider-Man, and if you hire someone who can't do that, the people once loyal to you are rejecting your forcing, yet you refuse to change, what I am supposed to gather from that?
I think the problem with Marvel is almost the exact same as DC's cinematic universe: the know these characters exist, but they want them THEIR way all because they are ALLOWED TO. It's not about delivering to masses who want the product for what it is, but rather how to get people in as soon as possible, changing characters because you have that power, and then getting away with it. The only difference is Marvel denies it, while the DCEU is at least doing damage control.
That makes the DCEU more respectable than Marvel comics in terms of acknowledging the audiences' response...the DCEU for goodness sake!
In the end, I believe DC to be the more respectable company...at the moment.
They deliver the product people want, they listen and acknowledge they need to improve, and the writers seem to more interested in telling good stories rather than forcing major change.
I think, deep down, that even Marvelfags know that their comics are not as good as they should be.