Was this a really smart or really stupid ending?

was this a really smart or really stupid ending?

So was Tesla's magic real? I can't even into

it was real, but also faked.

half of Sup Forums didn't understand the movie, lol

all the retarded flashbacks and flashforwards and timeline switching eventually just annoyed me and i stopped paying enough attention to care
the ending means nothing to me at that point

the state of Sup Forums

imo this is his best film

oh i also tried to watch it 3 times
each time with the wikipedia page open

>im so fucking dumb i cant even watch things
jesus

>the writers are so shit they turned the film into a Sci-Fi for a twist
What do you think?

>oh i also tried to watch it 3 times
each time with the wikipedia page open
Why are Americans so fucking dumb?

im irish

I also asked my wife's son to sit right next to me and explain to me every scene, but I still don't get it.

lmao
I didn't have any problem with the order of the scenes, just pay attention to the location and who's dead, who's alive or in prison, it may be disorientating in the first 10 minutes but after that you should get used to it

how you even seen interstellar?

the movie is a magic trick :P the """prestige""" if you will!

>hurr some clones hid away

dumb ending

that the character's many suicides were portrayed as murders was dumb, too

It's a dishonest flick.

it may have been murder it may have been suicide, if you didn't get that it was an open question you're dumb

It was a trick movie. Presented itself as Lovecraftian, but turns out to be Kafkaesque

>it may have been murder it may have been suicide, if you didn't get that it was an open question you're dumb

>makes a copy of himself, killing his original self as a part of the design
>somehow not suicide

you're as retarded as the film makers desu

you 2 are retarded. it was presented as murder if christian bales character did it, but turned out to be wolverine snuffing himself, thus suicide

>It took courage. It took courage to climb into that machine every night, not knowing...
>...if I'd be the man in the box...
>...or in the prestige.

ADHD kids I swear

>ADHD kids I swear

It makes a copy though, and only the copy was moved. He, the original, would always be the man in the box

That's your headcanon, faggot. The movie makes it explicit for non-brainlets that it's an open question, the original may have been transported leaving a copy, or the copy may have been transported leaving the original.

>go in expecting a period piece about magic with some nice drama
>get a sluggishly paced steampunk scifi mystery
6/10, but only for the interesting non-scifi elements and work of the art designers, costume designers, choreographers, etc. Possibly Nolan's worst, although I haven't seen Inception, Dunkirk, or Interstellar

>The movie makes it explicit for non-brainlets that it's an open question

Shit, I forgot about the scene with Tesla. Never mind.

Not him but saw interstellar three times.
Nice visual effects, but the story sucks hard:
a magic equation for what?
Love in between dimensions??
A 4d library because...???
The pilot doesn't know what a black hole is????
What if he make a mistake in doing the Morse code?????
They build a spaceship close to Saturn and his daughter is still alive??????
When the rest of the population thinks that losing money after slave is stupid???????

s/make/makes/
s/slave/space/

this ‘dumb ending’ is still miles better than the ending of harry potter, the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.