What the fuck kind of ending shot is this?

What the fuck kind of ending shot is this?

that feel when u get dubs

loser. check these

''Deh!''

...

*teledubs behind you*

There was a final Dementor in that sky, sucking away his happiness. It was a very sad ending.

It was visually reminiscent of the dementor effect when they suck away happiness.
It was meant to represent the last time there was happiness and fun in a HP movie before it devolved into generic, edgy grimdark YA bullshit in the 4th movie

A dull one.

...

Holy shit...

"No!"

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

"Deh-ubs!"

I swear what happened to 5 onwards in Harrykino? everything looks so damn bluish grey and not a whole lot of positivity

Literally walked out the theatre after I saw this

Hyperspace kamikaze

>BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAHAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANE!!!

Really Nolan?

A profound and often misinterpreted ending shot, in which Radcliffe is seen trying to escape at high velocity, but to no avail, the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series' only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it's certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

Accio Dublio!

The perfect shot for such a shit movie.

Based No!poster

Anyone else walk out of the theater after this shot?

One of the most based intros, always looking forward to it.

Well done

Based "No!" poster. 9/10 only bc no clifford