Do you think it was a well done sequel?
Do you think it was a well done sequel?
Brody Anderson
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
Aaron Ortiz
Haven't seen it but it looks well made
Samuel Nelson
WHEN YOU WERE A CHILD RIDING IN THE BACKSEAT OF A CAR DID YOU EVER IMAGINE YOURSELF JUMPING FROM ROOFTOP TO ROOFTOP AS THE HOUSES WENT BY CELLS
Andrew Rivera
Yes
Austin Carter
It was well done but incorrectly marketed.
People who hated it were expecting some Terminator action flick.
On a side note, it had too many sideplots, it could have used another 30 minutes to actually explain and stablish certain stuff, like Luv-K(was he K?) relationship or the imprisoned girl in a holodeck. but hell the movie was already too long.
Carson Baker
>too long
Juan Hernandez
Very well done. It's not perfect, the whole "replicant revolution" subplot was so unnecessary and obviously shoehorned in to set up a sequel. Deckard not having much to do was disappointing. But in all yes, it was pretty damn good.
Zachary King
Yes.
Zachary Martin
Yes, one of if not the best sequel ever made
Tyler Wright
Why would you even bother to respond to this thread, jeebus everyone thinks they have to comment on every goddamn thing even if they have to fucking idea what it is.
Jacob Diaz
Chase Jackson
better than most sequels to a 35yr old classic
Lucas Phillips
better than the prequel imo
Thomas Baker
Honestly and truthfully, it was boring, convoluted, and 2deep4u. Anyone saying otherwise is literally straight off the Redditboat. I honestly almost walked out it was so boring in the middle.
Joseph Reed
Another 30 minutes would've killed the film. If anything it needed to cut out some fluff like the overly long Vegas section.
Asher Wright
Should have been 20 minutes shorter with the underdeveloped sideplots dropped, or 30 longer to actually develop them
Namely the robot revolutionaries
Juan Reed
its like the writer read the Novel Does Androids Dream on Electric Sheep 20 years ago and picked the parts he barely remember and made this sequel based on that.
Colton Sullivan
Nah, I think it fell in between being too long and too short. It was already almost three hours long, they should've made it three and a half hours. Maybe flesh out the joi character more so her death would be more impactful
Leo Bennett
This
6/10 film at best
Dylan Ramirez
CUTE
Luke Gutierrez
It is the greatest sequel ever made. It surpassed the original by a huge margin. The great visuals. The deep meanings. The emotional intelligence. All strewn throughout. This is a thinking persons film that a brainlet could never understand.
Henry Turner
well the runtime was a bit long and the pacing wasn't the best
but honestly after seeing The Last Jedi this movie was a breath of fresh air.
Daniel Miller
Nah, the original Blade Runner is significantly better than the sequel but 2049 is still a modern masterpiece.
Nathan Taylor
So when people say 2049 is great that's just in comparison to modern day movies? If so then I can see why millennials think it's a masterpiece
Kevin Collins
The cutest !
Aaron Ramirez
I can't speak for other people but I think that would be correct. Nice digits.
Jaxson Jones
This is a joke, right?
Xavier Bailey
So this black out that kickstarted Wallace's rise to power... other than archives being erased did anything else major happen?
Zachary James
Watch the three official short films on YouTube that bridge the time gap. Here's the first (the second two are live action with Leto and Batista): youtu.be
Luke Gonzalez
Lol, cool meme boy
Joseph Evans
I can't believe this won an Oscar for Best Cinematography. I thought the original was shot better.
I feel there were a lot of shots in the sequel that just sat and got stale. I also recall feeling like the bizarre architecture in some of the scenes with Jared Leto really went to waste. Felt like they could have been staged better - like it was shot from shitty angles.
The only reason it won is because everything else is garbage.