Can any britfags explain to me why you still bother with this old bitch...

Can any britfags explain to me why you still bother with this old bitch? When are you going to get rid of your useless monarchy? Like what is even her purpose anymore besides waddling around in a tiara and waving at random shit?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_Jubilee_of_Elizabeth_II
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I think a royal family who actually have the people's best interest at heart would be the ideal government.

She is our queen as well shit cunt. Once there are photos of Trump with The Queen then the media will be forced to respect him!

DISAVOW WHAT YOU JUST SAID NOW

All the cucks claim the monarchy is good for tourism, while ignoring the fact we only need to preserve the buildings and tourists will flock anyway (see Italy, France).

The Royal Family is so arrogant they deliberately neglected their own residence for decades and now it is rat infested and falling apart and they asked the government for £350 million to renovate it at the taxpayer's expense.

That's 15% of our entire GDP! We will spend 15% of the nation's entire output on a home refurbishment for Her Majesty. I wonder how many tourists will need to come here to pay for that.

Retarded monarchists can't possibly defend this so your thread will 404.

Tradition. Remember when your Founding Fathers tried to establish some?

350 million pounds is not 15% of your GDP...

It is when you count the cost of Brexit over the 10-year period the renovation will take place because our currency will devalue further and most financial institutions will leave London to Frankfurt.

your countries GDP is 2.65 TRILLION. the renovation, while expensive, is nowhere near 15% of GDP.

someone has to meet with the prime minster every week and tell him what to do

it's not like she has any real influence or power it's all ceremonial

>most financial institutions will leave London to Frankfurt.
is this a clever plan to get certain people to self deport?

You're a retard
see

ok it may not be 15% but it's still expensive and pointless

Financial services mostly employ white, cis, privileged males. The average City worker is a 6'2 Chad who played rugby in university, bants with the lads on weekends and fuck all the sluts.
The chosen people at the top are a small fraction of the workforce and they won't be going anywhere.

i honestly cannot tell if you are very stupid or trolling

>When are you going to get rid of your useless monarchy?
Yea, (((your))) (((republic))) is so much better and accountable, right? As in (((parliament))) isn't bad enough.

It's more or less written into our souls. It's cultural. Just as your narrative of freedom and individualism is. Our narrative of loyalty to class identities, and separate of that, to the monarchy is written in our identities.Socialists have opposed it, my family is largely republican - it doesn't change anything. When we look at the monarch we see a focal point of class into a position of unity. You may shout "God save the Queen" patriotically or in the manner of the Sex Pistols - you have to pay deference. If they don't exert pressure on policy or government, they're actually useful - they provide a cultural point of unity and a unique PR face for the rest of the world. With or without the monarch they wouldn't see working class Yorskhire where I come from, so they may as well see something uniform and identifiable.

The Monarchy is entrenched into our society. The he monarch themself is meant to be the embodiment of the land, a living avatar of the kingdom. It is the natural progression from warrior, to warlord, to king. The perception that the quality of a person's character and strength is passed down their family line kept meant the tradition continued even when the monarch turned out not to be the greatest warrior. This has lead us to today. It is a system born of war, with the strongest able to take the land and keep it, the land being the basis of power. This led to the birth of the aristocracy and the monarch ruling over them. A similar situation could (and appears to be) develop in the US but with money being the catalyst of power rather than land. That the same few families seem to hold the money/power in US politics seems like the beginning of an aristocracy, a hereditary ruling class from which will emerge your own monarch.

Is it me or does she look meaner than Hillary?
Can any Brits chime in? What's the story here. Are they reptilians?

>The Royal Family is so arrogant they deliberately neglected their own residence for decades and now it is rat infested and falling apart and they asked the government for £350 million to renovate it at the taxpayer's expense.
Very false. It's being paid for out of pocket, and even a monarch has trouble renovating a heritage listed building.
>I wonder how many tourists will need to come here to pay for that.
According to the tourism board, more than enough. But either way, the Crown Estate brings in at least that much annually (probably more now, the figures are from 2012 or something).

Odds are he's a Paki "refugee".

How does a queen knighting Kissinger and Rothschilds help that echo issue in anyway?

THAT IS TREASON JOHNNY

Knighthoods and peers are parliamentary appointments, only a couple are genuinely chosen by Her Majesty.

Better her than Obongo.

YouTube

'The true cost of the royal family' by cpp grey you ignorant shit

I lived in London during that all that wedding and jubilee bullshit and Brits love the fuck out of this old lady - see here:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_Jubilee_of_Elizabeth_II

I would never live on that shitty ass tiny rainy island again, but they don't have much to be excited about (the women are super easy but also gross). They need the royal family to bring some joy to their sad little island.

>mfw i actually am a paki

A couple like Kissinger and Rothschild. She is sov of that order.

She also made a point about not being there to knight Mick Jager cus he's a bum and what not but had no such qualms when it comes to war criminals and bankers.

>She is sov of that order.
Her Majesty is font d'honour of almost all the British orders of knighthood. Doesn't mean She makes the lists. Again, it's parliamentary appointment. Especially for OBE like Kissinger and Rothschild. Garter is like one of the only ones Her Majesty personally chooses.
>She also made a point about not being there to knight Mick Jager cus he's a bum and what not but had no such qualms when it comes to war criminals and bankers.
Because Mick Jagger wouldn't be holding parliament by the balls as a banker and/or war criminal.

>
>
>Tradition. Remember when your Founding Fathers tried to establish some?

Might as well start respecting the satanist pedophile cult, cuz that's their tradition and been going on for ages.

...

Fucking traitorous republican scum.

>According to the tourism board, more than enough. But either way, the Crown Estate brings in at least that much annually (probably more now, the figures are from 2012 or something).
Are tourist dollars taxed at 100%? Huge cost to the taxpayers if not.
She has final approval after the lists are given to her.

>Are tourist dollars taxed at 100%? Huge cost to the taxpayers if not.
How do you figure?
>She has final approval after the lists are given to her.
But much like other monarchical powers, there's no real choice without massive vocal support from the people. That's just part of the deal.

Because eventually the libcucks are going to gain too much power and her sons will have to step in to unify the british empire.

Fuck off you disgusting jew filth

>Canada
>strong

Tourism.

British government has done several cost analysis and each time, they find that having royalty around significantly increases the amount of tourism and the amount of tourist dollars being spent within the country.

>massive vocal support from the people
Kissinger and Rothschild.
>How do you figure?
Last crown supporter was saying the tourism dollars brought in equaled the expenses. But only a portion of tourism dollars go back to the state coffers paying out royal expenses.

What if they cuck out to Brussels like so many previous royals did to Rome?

>Kissinger and Rothschild.
Your point?
>Last crown supporter was saying the tourism dollars brought in equaled the expenses. But only a portion of tourism dollars go back to the state coffers paying out royal expenses.
The tourism claim is always dodgy, but the general idea is that a tourist heading to the UK means them pouring £££ into the economy. Tax has very little to do with it, though sales tax would be part of that.

Because slogan of establishing of republic is crime in UK?

>Your point?
Did they have massive vocal support from the people?

>The tourism claim is always dodgy, but the general idea is that a tourist heading to the UK means them pouring £££ into the economy. Tax has very little to do with it, though sales tax would be part of that.

Brit the other day was saying tourism in = expenses. But if 100 million was spent and 100 million came in, only a portion of that 100 coming in actually went back to the state.

The numbers thrown around were basically saying the state spends X to create X in business thus breaking even. The state would in fact only be getting X / taxes back. Might as well just give the original X back to the tax payers.

>Did they have massive vocal support from the people?
No, but nor did NOT giving them an OBE have mass support.
>Brit the other day was saying tourism in = expenses. But if 100 million was spent and 100 million came in, only a portion of that 100 coming in actually went back to the state.
What an odd misunderstanding of economics.
Tourism money (which needn't be mentioned in regards to the monarchy, it's just a fringe benefit) is just foreign money being introduced to the local economy. How much goes back into state coffers is irrelevant.
>The numbers thrown around were basically saying the state spends X to create X in business thus breaking even. The state would in fact only be getting X / taxes back.
Yea, see that doesn't matter. Even if "the state" was losing money in that respect (i guess sales taxes?) it wouldn't matter, because money is going into the economy, which is more beneficial overall. So the idea of "just giving x back" doesn't work, because they're creating an environment in which the economy will be stimulated far better than if they just backwashed the funds.

But yea, all irrelevant when discussing monarchy costs, as it's well and above self funding.

>A woman who has spent her entire life in comfort but forced to adhere to rigid rules and working for the benefit of Britain

why don't I feel like calling her and old bitch, what is wrong with me

Globalists can't buy out our head of state, for starters.

Fuck the Queen. Make Australia a republic. Make Australia great for the first time ever. #MAGFTFTE

Its a very good thing for bureaucrats to know they are not the head of state, but are instead subjects of a higher authority.

In parliament our MPs are subjects to the crown, keeps their egos in check for the most part.

>Make Australia a republic.
How 'bout no, Le Jia. We prefer a non Jewish head of state.

Well we should at least purge all of our politicians and start again

Well that i agree with. Dump the (((politicians))) and have Prince Henry as our Arch-Duke.

Tourism and satire

She is the figure head of Britain, as it is Britain is losing most of its culture due to the influx of immigrants.
The Queen preserves the greatness of the UK, the fact we can afford to have a queen living in castles and gold painted mansions is a sign that Britain is NOT poor.
More over, the monarchy is something to aspire to, she holds the most traditional values, the nuclear family of the UK. Without her the country would lose its direction, its heart.
It will be a sad day when regressive lefts burn Buckingham palace down.

fuck your shitty monarchy

pure and simple, return to monarchical rule, but you wouldn't like it, you'd end up like canada, the melting pot for other countrys.

Enjoying your body pillows and anime? Your royal family would be a shamed of your country.

She earns them loads of money in tourism.

fuck your country... with an A bomb

brits are the most pathetic nation on earth.
the men are feeble and sickly cowards

The queen is the sovereign. If she goes, so does common law. That would be very bad

Could one man be more based?

Sort of true.
Who would give a shit about bongs if not for the queen and empire?

>you'd end up like canada, the melting pot for other countrys.
Why? Without politicians needing to gerrymander and divide support, we could be homogeneous and far stronger.

Oh the ironing.

>man
You appear to have posted a Jewish turd in armour.

>this post
>this flag

oh the ironing

...

Still butthurt over Charles I? Wish someone would do over Elizabeth, siting in the throne of Satan.

Says the country with the most virgins, shortest dick length and shortest height.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!

A FUCKING GOATSE

So we don't end up with a nigger muslim head of state like you. As long as the monarch survives, we will always be a WASP country and never a generic republic for absorption into the NWO. She must be defended at all costs. If she falls, we all fall.

the "queen" would make the rules, say hello to diversity as we use your country to do 1 of many things:
prison island (again)
vetting country (melting pot)
cash cow (moar taxes)
force parliment (keep dissolving goverment unti you pull your shit together)

This is such utter nonsense, have I taken the bait?

She's reptilian bro. Top of the food chain.

go back to ploughing those fields chink, stay mad.

the monarchy has down sized alot from the old days, we have a royal family, not the whole royal establishment.

Fuck off, cunt. I bet you don't even have British flood, dirty Abo-hybrid freak.

If it's useless then in what sense is it important if we remove it? She generally lets the PM do their thing and is respected enough by the political class to ensure the country runs smoothly and there's no party shenanigans.

It's really just a fail safe at this point, if politics runs amok for any reason then she can step in and start laying the smackdown on people. That's the best kind of use of that type of power, is to never have to use it but it always be a lingering threat. Kind of like a nuclear deterrent.

Blood...

>£350 million
>That's 15% of our entire GDP
You do understand that if the Queen weren't living in Buckingham Palace, then President Khan and his entire extended family would right? And that if no one were living there, we would still need to renovate it? Of course not. You think only what jews implant in your mind and are incapable of independent rational thought.

>It's really just a fail safe at this point
this, god save the queen, are silent protecter.
i would more likly raise arms if directed by the queen rather than are PM or the pope

>So we don't end up with a nigger muslim head of state like you.

We got rid of ours. Meanwhile, london mayor is a muslim extremist and tells you bongcucks to just "live with terrorism" or some shit, lmao

>Still butthurt over Charles I?
Over any historical wrongdoing, aye.

Except why? To what benefit for either nation? Plus, we're sovereign.

>We got rid of ours.
No, he served the maximum he could.

>No, he served the maximum he could.

And now he's gone and we elected a white man who's going to build a wall and says fuck off to islam. Your capital is still ruled by muslims and will be for quite a long time.

You elected an establishment plant, well done.

>and says fuck off to islam
He said a lot of things he's backtracking on.
>Your capital is still ruled by muslims
Hey now, ours is ruled by Chinks and a fat mining lesbian.

>Except why? To what benefit for either nation? Plus, we're sovereign.
you're giving your sovereignty back to the queen after he gave it to you via govermet. you'd be part of the kingdom, and kingdoms function like commies, we act like we're one country (britian) but we are seperate countrys, they call it socialism.
you would be the melting pot for the greater good of the rest of the union.

Yea, i'm still not seeing why any of this would happen beyond your curious fantasies. Like, it's detrimental for all.

but on the other hand you could always then say, fuk austrila i want to live in britian, and you could stick your finger up at euro trash as you show em your passport and tell customs that you'll be moving in.
no immigration restrictions. you can basicly get to ireland aswell since NI function under open boarders with ireland.

because we just let anyone into the union.... you were part of the empire, never the union. it would cost money to repersent you in white hall, and also we would now be paying your countrys adminastration bills, ect. we would turn you into a globalist paradise to cover costs. We're both better off the way we are, we gave you your independance, your never going to be able to get rid of it or you would have merged with NZ by now.

I feel like we're having different arguments here. And yours makes very little practical sense.

ii don't understand the argument, i thought you were wondering why we would rape your country.
austrilia is stronger than any country in the UK.New Zealand is like a super sized wales.
Austrilia was ment to be england MK.2

Nigger Jew queen fucking bitch fuck off

well american was ment to be england MK.2 but lets not worry about that fucck up. (ever wonder how aMerica got itss name?

My argument was that we should ditch politicians and have an Arch-Duke be the head of state under the Commonwealth (English) monarch, so we wouldn't have politicians dividing and fucking over the country.
So i'm kinda confused about all the attacks.

>(ever wonder how aMerica got itss name?
From Amerigo Vespucci. Not from Mercia, or even from Armorica.

She makes a public announcement every christmas.

Can't be getting rid of that now can we?

>Is it me or does she look meaner than Hillary?
I don't think the descriptive is "mean". It's more like healthier. Hillary looks old, decrepit and sick. It's obvious to a casual observer that Hillary has the best hair dresser and make up artist that money can buy and she still looks worn out and phony.
The British queen has class and she reeks of old money. Hillary looks like the queen of the trailer park with a cig dangling off her lower lip and a can of Busch in a styrofoam coozy in her paw.

I'm more concerned about the guys that will come after her.

>So we don't end up with a muslim head of state......

Wew lad

Otherwise Jack Whitehall and his family would have nothing to stand for in front of the telly with hand on heart.

Hopefully more active?

because tradition

But hey, at least it brings in revenue through tourism.

Not like some other tradition called the 2nd Amendment eh?

I think the queen should appoint a paki and a mud slime as dukes or honorary princes. Because that is the culture of England now. You cant have both. One culture has to go, and it will be yours.