Brit/pol/ - Degeneracy Edition

dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3969696/Anne-Atkins-says-cannabis-shattered-life-Cambridge-graduate-daughter.html

>The figure in the hospital bed was someone we barely recognised. Thin, unkempt and whey-faced, hair chopped off with kitchen scissors, I knew it was my daughter Lara, but something had changed her horribly.


independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/scotland-trial-universal-basic-income-universal-credit-welfare-reform-a7435926.html

>Development of the scheme, due to be tested in Fife, will be discussed on Friday by councillors, civil servants and members of the Scottish Basic Income Network, and would see welfare benefits including child and tax credits replaced with a universal flat-rate payment.

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38100561
theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/25/margaret-thatcher-pushed-for-breakup-of-welfare-state-despite-nhs-pledge
youtu.be/ZNWAPB9hL5o
youtube.com/watch?v=6U7r_yfkZOg
youtube.com/watch?v=wO4i75KsR0Y
indy100.com/article/snoopers-charter-investigatory-powers-bill-browsing-history-7437176
itv.com/news/2016-11-25/peer-87-dies-after-mobility-scooter-crash-outside-parliament/
bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38068078
youtube.com/watch?v=50_iRIcxsz0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

I live in a egg

Absolutely degenerate.

>Scots not even hiding the fact they're Parasites anymore.

EU leaders 'not bluffing' over Brexit terms, warns Malta's PM - bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38100561

>Malta
>fucking Malta

>Malta
Where?

We gave them a medal once.

This is the most important news story of the day;

theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/25/margaret-thatcher-pushed-for-breakup-of-welfare-state-despite-nhs-pledge

If this plan had gone ahead mass immigration and welfare dependency in Britain simply would not have happened.

Maggie was inches from saving Britain but wets in the party cried 'muh NHS'.

...

Fuck off Neo Nazi. There must be a way to save the country from immigrants without fucking burning the system to the ground.

Socialism is popular at face value so popularists use it for easy votes to the detriment of the Nations economy.

A Nazi would be in favour of Public State funded Healthcare.

This is the most disturbing diz-gusting video I've ever watched.

youtu.be/ZNWAPB9hL5o

Should have included more links tbqh lad

I'm not a neo-Nazi. This wouldn't have been 'burning the system to the ground' it would have merely required purchase of private insurance, which would have removed a major attraction for migrants (free healthcare).

You need to burn more than the system.

>A Nazi would be in favour of Public State funded Healthcare.

Do we need to murder unarmed local Policemen?

its the jo cox of nations

Fuck sake lads the Christmas present dress I was going to buy for my gf is out of stock. Bloody black Friday

Yeh because that's worked really well for the USA

hey brits quick burger questions:
Why were conservatives (Tories?) able to pick the new leader instead of Labour or UKIP? And is May serving the rest of Cameron's term or does she have a new term? Is she likely to win if she does well this term?

>Why were conservatives (Tories?) able to pick the new leader instead of Labour or UKIP?
Because they were the party in power, same thing happened a few years ago with Labour selecting Gordon Brown during Tony Blair's term.

>And is May serving the rest of Cameron's term or does she have a new term?
Serving the rest of his.

>Is she likely to win if she does well this term?
She's likely to win even if she does terribly, to be honest.

Make her something, it means more.

The USA has a mixed system and are still highly taxed. The idea is to reduce taxation across the board so that people can better afford insurance and Healthcare becomes more efficent and less wasteful.

Hmmm. No.
But being armed may save you and your family someday.

Driving test in an hour.

I've shat 3 times today lads.

thanks chap.

The youths that bricked my neighbours window could also more efficiently rob people.

>I've shat 3 times today lads.
worrying

Because the conservatives have the most MPs. We don't vote for the person like you guys do. We just vote for the house and then they essentially decide the PM.

She's serving the rest of his term, which isn't technically 'his' term.

If she called a GE tomorrow the conservatives would win by a landslide. If she waits til 2020, which is the latest she can wait, then she'd probably win but that's probably entirely dependent on 1. How brexit goes, 2. If Corbyn is still leader of Labour, 3. If Ukip get their shit together and 4. If the Scotts have got sick of the SNP

The US doesn't have an unswimmable moat and thousands of miles of white Europe between it and the browns.

It's not his or her term. This is how it works;

>the Tories won the most seats in the House of Commons in the 2015 election.
>until the next election they get to form the government (as they control a majority of votes in the HoC).
>the Tories internally choose a leader from among their number.
>the leader chooses the cabinet (their 'team').

Cameron was PM because he was the leader of the Tories when they won a majority in the 2015 election. He wasn't voted for as PM, he was elected MP for Witney. The party chose him as leader many years before. So when Cameron resigned the Tories decided who would lead them until the 2020 election. May was chosen and she reorganised the cabinet according to her wishes.

It is possible that May could leave in the next 4 years and we will have a third PM before the next election. However this in unlikely as the Tories are essentially guaranteed victory in 2020.

>Is she likely to win if she does well this term?

Most likelyto whatever she does, the main opposition party (Labour) was taken over by a literal commie last year and people are still too cucked to elect a third party. Both main parties are pro-immigration, pro-globalism, etc. We're still rather shafted despite BREXIT.

Legally speaking, the PM dosent even have to be from the majority party. It's purely expected convention that it is.

True, but not since WWI has the PM been from a party that wasn't the one with a majority.

Additionally there is the added complication of the House of Lords. Theoretically (although it was rather common in the 19th century and before) a lord can become PM, but nowadays they are usually restricted to cabinet posts.

(just for the yanks; the House of Lords is the other legislative house. Lords are unelected, and are appointed to lifetime lordships by the government)

How would this work? For example, the Tories get the majority of the seats, they name Corbyn as PM, yet be the party in power still?

Usually it happened when a coalition was formed, and the smaller party provided the PM.

Ahh that makes way more sense.

is that why Nige is talking about getting back in? I hope he doesn't come here, you guys need him more. And I don't think being an ambassador would be very influential.

huh this whole time I thought Cameron was Labour because he was remain. Also thought Blair was a Tory because he supported Bush. there goes that burger education

Commons overrules lords

In theory, Government, The conservative party can suggest to the Queen that the PM should be Corbyn and he would be appointed by her.

Very unlikely it would every happen, but its a quirk of our constitution, Parliament could suggest a horse as PM if it felt like it because it is unwritten and Parliament is not bound by any laws.

Who?

That's pretty interesting, and something you'd suspect they would've actually put down in writing by now.
>PM must be human.

she died for our sins

so britain could be free

How the FUCK do you go from this:

youtube.com/watch?v=6U7r_yfkZOg

To THIS:

youtube.com/watch?v=wO4i75KsR0Y

????

If you write something down like the US constitution, it becomes unflexible.

Our constitution is largely unwritten (statutes are written and some are constitutional) so as things change convention changes and we can adapt more efficiently. Things are still defined by precedent by certain authorities such as the Courts, but if it became the commonly held belief that people wanted Cats instead of people as MPs then the Constition would adapt over tome and the precedent would become that Cats can become MPs.

feminism

going to downy street next week lads

what would be a good hijink or prank to play on mummy may?

and your neighbour could more efficiently stop them robbing them.

Its also worth noting that if they truly wanted a gun they could get it via breaking the law, as they clearly show an aptitude for doing by bricking your neighbour's windows and robbing their house.

The old clingfilm-across-the-doorway trick, or clingfilf-over-the-toilet. Or just plain bleach ice cubes.

indy100.com/article/snoopers-charter-investigatory-powers-bill-browsing-history-7437176

THANKS MAY

sup kunts

Nothing to fear, you're not a radical Islamist or far night nationalist, are you?

>A Labour peer has died after being knocked off his mobility scooter outside of Parliament.

>Lord Taylor of Blackburn, 87, was knocked off his scooter in central London last week.

>The peer died on Friday, a Labour party spokesman confirmed.

itv.com/news/2016-11-25/peer-87-dies-after-mobility-scooter-crash-outside-parliament/

>Nothing to fear

Sure thing f a m

If we have a legal gun trade then the black market gun trade with have a greater and easier source of weapons.

I'd rather not have to worry about getting into a gun battle everytime I went to Asda and I would rather not have our Police force have the assumption I was armed if they had to pull me over for whatever reason.

Only about 200 to go and we get the Lords to approve Article 50

>trying to criminalise someone wearing a medal they didn't earn

How is this sort of vapid attempt at "patriotism" allowed to flourish, meanwhile actual measures designed to ensure the continuity of the English in their homeland are shouted down?

Answered my own question there. Focus on the medals rather than the important issues, citizen.

Nigel resigned too quickly, hes gone from being an outsider party leader to an outsider party member. He'd probably be in a better position to influence government policy as US or EU Ambassador, assuming Trump is swayed by him, than he is just by being the onlooker that he is now.

He deserved to get his life back but he must rather regret making that decision so quickly now. BREXIT is entirely in the hands of people that want us to stay in the EU and there is no serious electoral threat to those people in 2020.

Lords are Overruled by Commons. If MPs follow their constituents wishes then Lords can blow all the hot air they wish.

This would be a nice argument if there was any correlation between legal gun ownership and violent crime.

However there simply isn't one.

I do accept that there could be issues due to the Black market, however the Black Market Gun Trade already allows for people to acquire these weapons.

I'm also going to ask you why you feel that it is reasonable for you to ban something that could easily be owned for self defence, sport, or even just as a mantle piece because you assume people will use them to commit acts of violent crime?
Does the idea of assuming guilt preemptively not bother you?

bbc.co.uk/news/technology-38068078

You guys got your VPN's ready?

why do you care if GCHQ knows what you fap to?

>BREXIT is entirely in the hands of people that want us to stay in the EU and there is no serious electoral threat to those people in 2020.

Is it that bad? I thought May respected the leave

This is a curveball but could you possibly organize a threat to mass-vote labour if they don't enact article 50?

The Food Standards Agency is not GCHQ.

I'd also recommend reading
"Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?
A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence"
written by Don. B Kates and Gary Mauser, published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.

Although if you don't have time for a Journal piece then try taking a quick visit to gunfacts.info
Its fairly comprehensive.

Because tomorrow it will be what political beliefs you subscribe to - what views you hold and what private internal thoughts you believe.

It is a clampdown on freedom of speech.

YO BRITONS
WHY THE FUCK AIN'T YOU OUTTA EUROPE YET
Leave already you pussies, what the heck are y'all still doing there, you niggas voted right? you wacky ass dudes voted to leave, then why ain't you left?

Nearly every public body with an employee above some certain paygrade and managerial rank can punch into your 12 month browsing history

Sure does sound completely robust and not at all liable for abuse

...

>outta Europe yet
Europe is a geographic region and, although it is largely political in its existence, exiting the EU is not the same as exiting Europe.
As for why we haven't left yet?
Our government want to stall it as much as humanly possible.

Can tell your part of the 40% dumb prick

devilish - and prob wont get me fired. good job lad

I can't help but feel that if this was some Miliband led Labour govt. passing the Snoopers Charter, this place would be in uproar of dirty socialist immigrant loving bastards wiping out our freedoms

But because it's "Muh Mummy May" doing it, everyone's ambivalent about it all.

>Is it that bad? I thought May respected the leave

No one really knows what May thinks, what we know for certain is that she's an opportunist. She kept out of the EU debate to put herself in position to become leader. That said she has a long track record of being pro-Islam, and immigration levels went up when she was home secretary.

Her personal views aside it's simple numbers, the majority of tory MPs want us to stay in, and so do the majority of MPs in parliament.

>This is a curveball but could you possibly organize a threat to mass-vote labour if they don't enact article 50?

Wishful thinking I'd say, althought I'm fairly defeatist. People are very apathetic toward taking political action in this country.

>lets fuck over our own citizens to keep immigrants out

Or you could just, you know, have a sane immigration policy

Generals belong to Sup Forums.
Get the fuck out you limeys.

she looks like her breath smells

fuck off tampon and elect based hofer already

This general has been running for two years

the fact that this is the first time I've seen you complain about it makes me think you're a newfag who needs to lurk moar.

damn.

I thought I was rather dashing

naw nigga, naw
you got it all wrong
all i'm sayin is like, it's been 3 years since Brexit and y'all're still speaking German
times a-wastin' and before you know it everyone will forget about the referendum and you'll just go on with your lives and everyone will act like Brexit never happened

The correlation (assuming you image is accurate) is poverty, poor nations have less roubust systems in place for enforcing the law. I would assume, but I've not confirmed, that spending on police is much high in US states with lax gun laws than for the United Kingom per capita.

Crime will always exist, and allowing criminals to better arm themselves forces law abiding citizens to do the same and such the escaltion of force is at a starting level several time higher than it would be normally.

The United States and the United Kingdom and two very different nations. I will admit I don't have the time or currently the will to read your link.

Gun Control in the United States is probably at this stage a fools errand as the market already exists and the weaponry would just move to the Black Market or through (currently) lax border controls.

Our status as an Island instsntly puts us at an advantage to controlling illegal imports. It limits the amount of people capable of smuggling fire arms into the nation and it also limits the points of entry. And with no widespread current market, the black market would struggle to meet any demand.

Therefore I see no reason to increase the starting level of the escaltion of force as Guns in this country are for the most part controlable.

Untill it becomes the norm for you to expect an assailant to be carrying a fire arm, gun laws should continue to be maintained.

I personally believe a large reason we havent seen an attack on the scale of France is that Weaponry is more easily smuggled into mainland Europe than pur Island Nation and to create a legal gun market would severely increase our risk to such attacks.

Why do I waste my time by giving yank posters the benefit of the doubt?
Every single one of them that comes to Brit/pol/ is a moron.

Explain something to me.

How can they pass this "invade personal privacy and steal data" act while we are still in the EU?

New thread,lads.

You fuckers better be taking your multi-vitamins and minerals.

who second referendum lads?

why would you read the daily mail?

it's a load of clickbait shit

>have to make a phone call

1776
suck a dick
we're #1
fuck you

>People are very apathetic toward taking political action in this country.


You have 4 years, you need to convince your countrymen their days are numbered

paki ples go

>Does the idea of assuming guilt preemptively not bother you?
You sure convinced me.

I'll feel safe in my bed knowing the burglar now comes armed with a gun ready to shoot me dead because he expects me to have one.

I'm Just have poo in loo style facial hair

suck my cock cutfag you have a 3 inch dick im superior to you 1812 get fucked

>This women's equality bit on DP
>A guy used "It's 2016" against feminism
I'm shocked desu

~Independence~

youtube.com/watch?v=50_iRIcxsz0

kys dumb burger

Ideally this will happen:

>second ref announced
>right before the 2020 elections
>larger Leave margin, 20+ points
>remoaners BTFO for eternity
>Tories and Labour both adopt pro-Brexit positions in a vain attempt to survive
>constitutional crisis, lowest turnout in history for the GE
>*FANTASY LEVEL*
>Queen dissolves Parliament until new GE can be arranged with new parties
>puts in place an interim ruling council comprised of the most talented, patriotic individuals in the country, scraps hundreds of bullshit laws and regulations
>Britain is made Great Again

>Women party "leader"
>All muh support
I'd bet money that >90% of her base are middle class white women

you'll have to wrest the bloody cod from my dead hands

A President holds more power than our Queen.

They can Pardon criminals thus creating a binding law regardless of whether or not it is the will of the people.

Parliament, as the nations supreme law maker, cannot be bound by any laws and as such cannot bind any future Parliaments.

So in your quest to free yourself of Tyranny, you created a more Tyranical system than the one you "revolted" against.