Germans are the niggers of the white race

Germans are the niggers of the white race

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ztZI2aLQ9Sw
wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Main_Page
politicalviolenceataglance.org/2016/11/22/understanding-the-alternative-for-germany-origins-aims-and-consequences/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_revolutions_of_1848–49
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_Revolution_of_1848
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution_of_1848
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

nope

Irish are

This

They're whiter than Germans

oh nein muh dresden.

I thought we were talking about behavior

are you seriously comparing the axis bombing campaign to the allied one?

I don't recall the irish destroying europe (at least) 2 times.

...

Germanic race such as germans and nords are the master race. Jews knows about this, so they manipulate us with socialism and go full genocide on us with immigration.

English are even something worse.
traitors to mankind.

By US census definition of "white", it would be North Africans, then Middle Easterners, then South Balkans, South Italy, and Iberian peninsula.

>OI LADDY THE GERMANS ARE EVIL LADDY THEY NEGROIDS INNIT
fucking anglos honestly, just fuck off tommy

youtube.com/watch?v=ztZI2aLQ9Sw

are you sure about that, goyim? if germanics and nords are so great, then how are they being manipulated?

>omg someone is angry their city was firebombed by a people who you wanted a peaceful pact with

Get the fuck out, you kike shill.

What exactly makes you the master race? Is it your blonde hair and blue eyes that make you the supposed master race? You rely on looks, is that it? Literally no better than a nigger going "muh dick". Pathetic.

look at the US, mostly german heritage and still manipulated

I don't recall you ever being relevant.

where can I find this newspaper article without the kike in the picture? Google doesn't find it ...

>manipulate us with socialism
senpai, prussianism & the shit we had before our goverment pumped niggers in to our country was the good shit.
Capitalism & marxism are the true cancers, national socialism is the good shit
pic unrelated

Not an argument, hans

Mass media and ((education)). We've gotten to a point where farmers who dropped at out school at 12 and dont watch tv have a better outlook of the world than normies do.

After opening a trust company in Reno, Nev., Rothschild & Co. began ushering the massive fortunes of the world’s most wealthy individuals out of typical tax havens, and into the Rothschild run U.S. trusts, which are exempt from the international reporting requirements.

The Rothschild banking dynasty is a family line that has been accused of pulling the political strings of many different governments through their control of various economic systems throughout the world.

Historically, there is ample evidence to show that the family has used insider trading to bilk money from both private and public funds.

During the Battle of Waterloo in the Napoleonic wars, Nathan Rothschild was responsible for one of the oldest cases of “insider trading,” which led to the Rothschild family robbing a whole nation blind. In 1815 when the battle of Waterloo took place, there were no quick methods of communication like we have today so messengers were used for communication in times of war. The Rothschild’s took advantage of this by having spies on the frontlines of the battle who would return information to the family faster than the messengers used by the military.

When the British won the war, Nathan Rothschild, was of course, the first to know, and he immediately went to the stock exchange and started selling stocks while putting out the rumor that the French had won the war. This created a panic on the floor of the stock exchange and investors all over England began frantically selling their stocks. With the price of all stocks plummeting Rothschild was able to buy out the whole English market for a fraction of its cost. When word returned that the English had actually been victorious, the value of the market soared, and overnight Nathan Rothschild expanded his family’s wealth, and cemented their position as one of the richest families in the world.

I agree mostly, but capitalism is only bad if you have central banks hijacking the system including taxpayer bailouts etc. Remove fractional reserve banking, power ofissueing money is given to the state again and the capitalist system would work way better.

...

Here's one then.

Scientist used swedish and norweigan dna to compare it to the oldest human remains found in europe, aka the first european or first white man are closest to us. All the other whites are breeded with dirty races, like brits for example. Bad teeth, fat, ugly, dumb etc

Yes yes
Fuck Germany
Gernat is the worst pig dog ever
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day … If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime … If you have already killed a German, then kill another one – there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses. Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed. Kill the Germans! … – Kill the Germans! Kill!”

>dumb
>Built the modern world from the ground up
What have swedes ever done besides be Finlands bitch?

It's Pooland's fault for not giving up the Danzig corridor: rightful German clay.

you forgot finns russians and danes

Oy gevalt, the filthy Germans bombed our British Empire that brought us all the niggers and fine cultural enrichment!

Goy, kill the Germans, they will make annuda shoah!

Divide and Conquer

You guys are a bunch of shills and you don't even know it.

It was finland that was our bitch if you knew any history. I'd say white man as a whole builded the modern world, france, scandinavia, italy, germany all contributed to what made europe great.

>removing fractional reserve banking
Didnt some from Germany try that?

well capitalism doesnt offer any sort of national unity, even when the US was at it's "golden age" in the 60s the american dream was to make yourself more succesful then others at all cost, even if it to treat your national brethren like shit.
Compare that to NS or even in some cases, communism were helping out your countrymen is as important as helping yourself out.

Can confirm

Here you go britbong

The further you go back though, the darker your ancestors get. Mitochondrial Eve is a Monkey and your ideals about racial purity aren't even a blink of an eye in geological time.

No never. You sure it was a German you are talking about?

>well capitalism doesnt offer any sort of national unity,

True, that's why I also believe that we need to change systems. Capitalism and Marxism are basically just economic models while National Socialism is the "complete package". No wonder it is easier likeable (if one reads into all the ideologies/systems available that is).

yeah fucking kys burger
serbia started ww1 by not letting Austria finish off the black hand, which they were obviously funding.
not to mention, it was Russia who made it a world conflict by going to war with Austria.

I always wondered how the Polish rebels who fought the Germans felt after WW2 was over and the allies abandoned them to be raped once again, just for 50 years instead of 5.

Also I read somewhere that the deluge actually was worse for Poland than WW2, any truth to this?

The Germans must be eradicated once and for all.

>which they were obviously funding.

Even government higher ups where part of the black hand.... and even a second "secret society" in there which overlapped with the black hand.

>Also I read somewhere that the deluge actually was worse for Poland than WW2, any truth to this?

you got me intressted here, I initially wanted to type out that this couldn't be true but the polish wiki says that the damage was comperable to polands loses in ww2. wow, just wow.

Hitler didnt remove fraction reserve banking? Based Andrew Jackson was probably the best leader we had then

>Slavs start ww1 (serbs and Russian)
>Slavs start ww2 (poles)

wew lad, I expected ww2 to be blamed on my for my flag but ww1. damn thats some next level autistic logic stretching.

but remind me please, whos troops crossed the border first?

>Hitler didnt remove fraction reserve banking?

Of course he did. But I tried making the "joke" that Hitler is Austrian, not German. BUT, the creation of money was given to the state slightly before Hitler, i.e. the nationalization of the central bank was still done during the Weimar Republic and Hitler just continued that.

Not sure about fractional reserve banking during the Weimar Republic though.

We could have been bros against Russia, why did Sigismund have to keep claiming the Swedish throne, he fucking hated it here anyway.

truth. behold:

gingers
gnigers
ngigers
niggers

>Serb cocksucker kills Austrian hungary heir to the throne
>perfect justification for war
>Russian pan-slavic buttbuddies have to fight for some gay balkans province inhabited by turk rape babies

>ww2
>nationalist German country next door trying to requisite ethnically German clay
>oh durrrrr let's start killin duh goymans and ally with anglos what could go wrong
>oh whoops Germany takes you over in a month

>Serbia not responsible for WW1
>kek

>but remind me please, whos troops crossed the border first?
The ones bright enough to get the first strike in of course.

But maybe having an actual redpill about WW1:

>A-H going full "war"... why? It was either that or dissolve from within, a struggle for existance.
>Russia wants to have their pan-slav idea going and taking the straits instead of taking care of their people who already tried one communist revolution already
>France supporting Russia in their efforts, standing by them in case of war (Russia planned war for around 1917 anyway but they were still weakened due to losing the Russo-Japanese war)
>Germany supporting their only ally left while being surrounded by 3, maybe 4 possible hostiles so just saying "fuck you" to your only ally is rather unrealistic
>Two important things need to be known for WW1. One is "mobilization means war" which was the thought process at that time because full mobilization could not be stopped due to lacking communication. Meaning if one country starts mobilization, it means war.
>The other is the "plan of action", which all the other countries new for all the countries in case for war (not the detailed plans of course but deduced from strategy)

cont..

>Of course he did.

whee do you get that idea from? At no point the NS government ended fractional reserve banking.

I used to support this "MUH GERMANS DESERVED IT" in terms of the bombing campaign but..

Tbqhwy what the allies did was pretty brutal once those bombers got the Mustang escorts

This "plan of action" includes that Russia knows Germany will do a "first strike" because they have two fronts. France knows this too, just like Germany knows Russia takes lots of time for mobilization etc etc
>Russia starts secret mobilization first, hoping nobody would find out. The tsar even lied to the Kaiser about this (they were good friends writing regular letters). Due to Russia being retarded, Germany found out they were mobilizing trying to get the edge.
>Kaiser furious at the Tsar because he was deliberately lied to in a matter that concerns all of Europe. German order of mobilization was given LAST of all the European countries (even Britain already had their ships ready "just in case" kek).
>Germany still gets the first strike

The moment the Tsar ordered secret mobilization, he did so knowing that if found out by Germany, it will trigger a first strike. France knew about Russian mobilization, thus also knowing to expect a first strike might Germany find out about it.

Just one reason people say Nicholas II was retarded.

how about you start reading a bit about WW1? It is a fascinating subject.

Is there a difference? Both were focused on killing civilians.

>At no point the NS government ended fractional reserve banking.

Sources claiming this usually suck off Hjalmar Schachts cock and claim Nazi Germany's economy was only for fueling rearmament and that most resources went into that for starting the war.... so....

Worse than WW2 - I doubt it, but nevertheless the Swedes went on a savage rampage

I suspect it was mainly damaging to Lithuania, just like the Cossack uprising ravaged Ukraine

No, thats lies. Science hasnt proven that. There are more there than just skin colour btw

then prove your point.

Italy gave us Rome
Greece gave us democracy and foundations of science
Frogs stopped Muslim expansion and created a lot of art
Brits created greatest empire in recorded history
Scandinavians raided few churches and were irrelevant. Don't take credit for something you didn't do.

Hey, we invented the smörgåsbord and the monkey wrench!

>We could have been bros against Russia

>their people who already tried one communist
kek

I've read the Sleepwalkers, both Volumes by Sidney Fay and The Origins of World War I by Richard Hamilton. That's over 2000 pages just for the outbreak. How much more do I need to read oh so wise Achmed Abdullah?

>why did Sigismund have to keep claiming the Swedish throne, he fucking hated it here anyway.

well there were rumors that we was a literal faggot so there is that.

the majority of the people in that corridor were polish, actually so would gdansk and the region near it be if not for the continous genocide and germanization pre ww1 but thats a to vast subject i am not going to go into it tonight.


come on, attacking serbia was not nessecary. it was a mere pretext to satisy austrias imperial ambitons. iirc they never wanted to start a world war, just take over serbia and be a bit of a bigger country (oh well that backfired).

but ww1 is a gray area, granted. not really blaming it entirely on the germans, it would have probably happened one way or the other.

(but ww2 is on you).

You are the eternal enemy of everyone in Europe, our ancestors should never have kickstarted your shitty country.

Yeah ok, there were Russian people involved. Just the kikes alone couldn't have done a Revolution. They neede useful idiots after all.

>Not having read Storm of Steel by Ernst Junger

Are you even German?

so only obsolete stuff, you either are ignorant on purpose or simply can't afford real scientific books, Özgür.
But in any case, nothing you posted can be verified in any document, I have my doubts you read much at all.

>come on, attacking serbia was not nessecary.

Look at it from A-H's perspective. Serbia was producing heavy nationalistic propaganda trying to further rile up the people within the empire. Sooner or later it would have led to it's destruction. A-H literally thought war was necessary (to be more precise, 2 or 3 higher ups thought this, one in particular. Forgot his name though).

>(but ww2 is on you).
Yeah, I mean Britain giving you the clean slate to agitate Germany, saying they will help you, knowing in advance they never can and US doing basically the same. Poland was delivered to a slaughterhouse on purpose and today you people are even greatful to the US.

Be German. Repeat communist propaganda. Make sense because communists were financed by Germany as well.

Red pill: Nikolai was dethroned by no others but Romanov clan and high aristocracy. They had done such things in the past but it did't work this time. They lost control after February and then foreign governments interfered. The rest is history.

...

>stuff from the 1920s/1930s, from the 1990s and 2013
>all obsolote

Could you provide me with your oh so scientific books? Interesting to see that you just "throw away" the work of established historians.

>nothing can be verified in any documents
is this the go to argument for the shills creating weak bait? You /his/ degenerates certainly still have a lot to learn.

Nice joke

Hitler only bombed strategic targets. It was after churchill's constant bombing of German city's that Hitler was forced to bomb civilians to.

You are too stupid to realize I was talking about the 1905 tried communist revolution in Where is this mentioning communist propaganda? Was Nikolai dethroned in 1905?

>communists were financed by Germany as well.
>be (((Jacob Schiff)))
>send my money though German Banks belonging to (((Max Warburg)))
>Get this money to (((Lenin))) and (((Trotsky)))
>It was the Germans
kek.

The only thing Swedes kickstarted is cuckoldry.

>was forced to bomb civilians to.
Well he wasn't forced to, he just did when he should have continued to bomb the airfields. But yes, Britain started with the civilians.

>Could you provide me with your oh so scientific books? Interesting to see that you just "throw away" the work of established historians.

for a kick off, you could the real documents.
wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Main_Page
here you can check for yourself what the original wording was. There is no way around Fritz Fischer, if one hasn't read his pioneering research, one is no capable to debate WW1 at all. Annika Mombauer - Die Julikrise is good, most recommended is Der Erste Weltkrieg, Wirkung - Wahrnehmung - Analyse - Herausgegeben von Wolfgang Michalka.
yw

So people not reading your favourite books are automatically not knowledgable about WW1? At least you could try to show where I was wrong insteat of instantly resulting to shitposting partnered with extreme arrogance.

>inb4 I dont have the time for this.

>(to be more precise, 2 or 3 higher ups thought this, one in particular. Forgot his name though).

yes there was a guy, and he was pushing for war way before the assasination. ironically, the one that held him back ferdinand whos death enabled him to push for his agenda.

>I mean Britain giving you the clean slate to agitate Germany, saying they will help you

100%. pilsudski died in '35 and the new leadership thought it could trust on the UK and take on germany for a while. they should have looked at belgium in ww1.

I agree that it wasn't a smart move. But that man had so much passion for his people that I think he couldn't let it go

Ah ok I wont bother further with you, your authors seem to have strong political bias as Fischer is a leftist, Mombauer (a woman kek) even gets dismantled on fkn amazon reviews showing they just ignore certain involvements of some countries.

At least Michalka seems to be relevant.

>So people not reading your favourite books are automatically not knowledgable about WW1?

It is not about what I personally prefer.

>At least you could try to show where I was wrong insteat of instantly resulting to shitposting partnered with extreme arrogance.

You were wrong in every single point. The thing you should do is: make an own research of those claims you made can be verified. Verified with original sources, wording in documents, memos. If you have a specific question, feel free to ask.

>Ah ok I wont bother further with you, your authors seem to have strong political bias as Fischer is a leftist,

That's ridiculous, he was no leftist. His books are apolitical, he solely concentrated on the issue. I like his rational analytics.

>Mombauer (a woman kek) even gets dismantled on fkn amazon reviews showing they just ignore certain involvements of some countries.

Review trolling is irrelevant.

>At least Michalka seems to be relevant.

then start with him.

>new leadership thought it could trust on the UK
yeah or some other examples kek

>But that man had so much passion for his people that I think he couldn't let it go
True, this passion was what let to his downfall. I mean he could let the Germans suffer in Poland and avoid the war (which would have come against the commies sooner or later). But who would have watched this happen? They already got nearly 100k German refugees out of Poland and no sane country would have watched this.

Shame that Poland blindly trusted Britain. They should have agreed to the anti commie alliance with Germany which would have finallized the German-Polish border (which the Weimar Republic refused to do).

Well in the end, the US/kikes played them all, removed the French and British Empire, destroyed the Nazis and had the US as hegemon... at least for a few years where the commies did not have had nukes. That fucked up their plans.

>You were wrong in every single point.

The burden of proof lies on you because you say I'm wrong.

Yet seeing the letters of Willy to Nicky already explains a lot at confirms most of what I'm saying.

>inb4 these letters are all forgeries.

go suck prussian cock somewhere else you cryptokraut

>The burden of proof lies on you because you say I'm wrong.

No, the burden of proof lies with you - you make the claim, you provide the evidence.

>Yet seeing the letters of Willy to Nicky already explains a lot at confirms most of what I'm saying.

They prove nothing, they were informal memos of two monarchs. The decisions were not made by the monarchs, but their administrations.

politicalviolenceataglance.org/2016/11/22/understanding-the-alternative-for-germany-origins-aims-and-consequences/
guten tag germanons
should we all be worried about a right wing party getting power in germany?
iv heard they are basically a meme party, but even so...
german nationalism always ends the same way

how about proving every single point you made?

>should we all be worried about a right wing party getting power in germany?

its no right-wing party, they maybe are are bourgeois centre-right aka the least left.

>german nationalism always ends the same way

what do you mean? The nationalist movement was crushed in 1848, what we have since then is tyranny.

lol
this tired old meme
hitler bombed civvies first
and that was after what he did in europe
2 million civilians died in warsaw

>least left
oh ok
is there no appetite for right wing politics at all? you have pegida.
idk much about afd policy at all
i dont understand what you mean about 1848. my german history is very poor.
i think its fair to say that people really do fear the idea of german nationalism. i know rational people who are quaking in their boots (scared) after this right wing resurgence purely because it might hit deutschland

>eternal Anglo

Hitler asked for peace the moment he had won from Poland. Warsaw was bombed because Poland ignored the call for peace

It was the governments own fault

>oh ok
>is there no appetite for right wing politics at all? you have pegida.

how is Pegida right-wing? For decades ppl demonstrating against regimes were left-wing, now suddenyly they are right-wing? Self-determination and political participation were traditional democratic left-wing demands. Nationalism always was left-wing.

>idk much about afd policy at all
i dont understand what you mean about 1848. my german history is very poor.

Uh, 1848 was not limited to Germany, for a kick-off
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_revolutions_of_1848–49

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hungarian_Revolution_of_1848

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Revolution_of_1848

etc.

>i think its fair to say that people really do fear the idea of german nationalism.

why?

>i know rational people who are quaking in their boots (scared) after this right wing resurgence purely because it might hit deutschland

Ppl should fear tyranny, not those opposing it.

fuck off anglo scum