DRUDGE, INFOWARS, BREITBART, WIKILEAKS CONFIRMED FAKE NEWS

sputniknews.com/us/201611251047854990-washington-post-fake-news-propornot/
propornot.com/p/the-list.html

PropOrNot, a nonpartisan collection of researchers with foreign policy, military and technology backgrounds, have compiled a list of Russian propaganda fake news sites.

PropOrNot’s monitoring report, which was provided to The Washington Post in advance of its public release, identifies more than 200 websites as routine peddlers of Russian propaganda during the election season, with combined audiences of at least 15 million Americans. On Facebook, PropOrNot estimates that stories planted or promoted by the disinformation campaign were viewed more than 213 million times.

There is now undeniable evidence that most conservative outlets are in fact controlled by Russia in order to manipulate the US election.

They also released Chrome plugin to block the disinformation. Finally there is a defense against the Russian backed right-wing fake news menace. There's a chance Google will follow their lead and blacklist these lugenpresse publications from search results.


guys I'm so sorry we interfered with your democratic process ;_; clearly our hackers and propaganda effort helped elect the wrong person. let's all hope the recount will fix that.

Other urls found in this thread:

spidr.today
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-22/elon-musk-vs-the-trolls
archive.is/8jwjh
archive.is/lYPMP
archive.is/fUSsu
archive.is/pDzER
bbc.com/news/world-europe-38056242
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>There is now undeniable evidence that most conservative outlets are in fact controlled by Russia in order to manipulate the US election.
According to whom? Some literally-who blog?
Nice try, faggot.

MUH RUSSIANS

This is retarded. How could drudge even be fake they don't write anything themselves just link to other websites

>Some literally-who blog?
Washington Post is a respected and trustworthy publication, and so are the experts they consulted

>((((EXPERTS))))
>((((NONPARTISAN))))

These kikes are so fucking brazen.

>experts

>Craig (((Timberg)))

Druge only links to other websites doesn't it? They don't write news.These fags couldn't even get that right.

>Wikileaks that releases actual legitimate official documents procured from external sources.

CNN: DUDE IT'S FAKE !

.sad

Jesusfuck, the "fake news" everyone is complaining about it the fake news that was coming from the main stream media.

>random propaganda website claims random people told them every website with an opinion they don't like is secret foreign government propaganda
is the kike mainstream media trying to shred their own credibility as fast as possible?

Naw, they are one of the guilty parties spreading fake news. They are a business looking to make money, not to inform.

Bunch of neverheard sites. Best way to combat false information is to use aggregators like spidr.today

REDSCARE
E
D
S
C
A
R
E

They are trying to incite us to do something because their useful idiots are still freaking out about "election fraud"

Wtf I love Putin now

MUH ebil Ivan
You you getting out of control, quick , attack the Russians

Wow, what's next?

>Russia tricked Hillary into toppling Libya for her and her friends' profit! They also tricked Bush into invading Iraq and funding global jihad for personal benefit too! They've been duping us for decades!

>Pravda on the Potomac.

When will these crybaby faggots just accept that Donald Trump legit beat Hillarys brains out

The pedoscum among us sure are pushing the fake news angle hard. I wonder why.

Pizza anyone?

Another group of CS III experts who made a url block bot.

{{{experts}}}

we are the fucking experts, if any

ugh wtf i'm liberal now take my wife please

Has anyone noticed that everything the Left accuses us of, they do themselves?

Not just a few things, but everything.

Could the MSM be anything else but fake news? When was the last time they reported the news rather than spammed editorials? For real? I can't think of anything at all neutrally reported in over a decade.

So the Washington post, which complains about people not fact checking, didn't fact check this site.

"experts say"

Well that does it for me, I'm convinced.

I hope you aren't about to deny the tremendous power of Russian hackers.

>Pictured is Alecko Brunscivich, the know perpetrator of the forging of 35,000 emails centred around Clinton and her campaign

To paraphrase Jon Jafari, "It wasn't that your strategy of [Being blatant left-wing propagandists] was wrong, you need to DOUBLE DOWN NOW!!

I am part of RG Mechanics vast botnet m8.

While I'm playing my hooky pirated games, my computer is undermining the borgoise decadent West in the background.

IT'S ONLY OKAY WHEN AMERICA LIES ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES TO INFLUENCE/JUSTIFY FOREIGN POLICIES

>Craig (((Timberg)))
Every fucking time.

Projection is a real psychological phenomenon and you'll see it exhibited by almost every leftist once you start looking for it. Truly frightening how accurately it describes them.

Infowars and Drudge have almost been online for 20 years. I guess the Russians are pulling a long con.

>The plan by the (((media))) to discredit anything they dislike is to call it effectively fake and gay

>by Timberg
>Timberg
>-berg

>wikileaks
>news
wew

>Russians

I always have to smile now if I read (((experts)))

mexican illegals and british news outlets "tamper" with every presidential election we have. Get over it.

>tfw blaming Russian propaganda won't make Hillary or her campaign's strategy any less shitty

So any news organization that doesn't report on Russia in a way that portrays them as "literally Hitler" is fake news?

Got it. I'll make sure I only use those sites from now on.

CNN should just become a porn channel.

They'd regain their viewership and they wouldn't be shitting themselves over other news sources being much better than them.

is that the new "according to sources"?

>experts say

>Washington Post is a respected and trustworthy publication
Back to Plebbit

I like how there's no files, no real outline-able agenda, no suspects, no financial linkings, no information correlation between Russian and western independent media and no emails.

So by "fake news" they really just meant "news that is not 100% in line with American foreign policy"? Hmm.

>Washington Post
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LOL
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
OH GOD
*WIPE TEAR*
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
yeah... good one!

I was being sarcastic retardo

This makes me so fucking angry. Because its absolute blatant projection. These people have been excused of being biased, lying, deceptive, paid press with no interest in the truth and who are funded and backed by international interests who don't care about America. And what do they do when they're proven wrong about EVERYTHING and the made they said had NO CHANCE of becoming President becomes President?

They triple down on their claims as the only orthodox source of Truth and decry all their opposition as liars who are paid by foreign influences.

The sheer audacity of their lies is unbelievable.

...

Reminder that (((someone))) taken down long room polls (one of the only group to say trump would win) for 3 months and called them "russian fake news"

Are Russians/Reds the boogeyman again?

WE WUZ EXPERTS N SHIT

thanx to HIlldog and the media covering for her still yup

they have to go with it since they cant admit to being both corrupt and incompetent

>((((expert)))) petrodollar kikes say

Washington Post is a propaganda machine, not a news site.
Fuck these faggots. There's no winning against them unless we kill them.

>guys I'm so sorry we interfered with your democratic process ;_; clearly our hackers and propaganda effort helped elect the wrong person. let's all hope the recount will fix that.

Op, Muricans are not equipped with Irony decoder. Only sarcasm.

This is true on both sides, tbqh. No one knows how to make a logical argument or cite credible sources. Claims of Trump being a racist or Hillary being corrupt have the same degree of legitimacy but nobody can look past their biases to see how ridiculous it all is.

What's a lecko?

What strikes me is that these guys have a good detector of what russian intelligence services might be up to, in other words they have a sophisticated friend-foe recognition sense, but they're not noticing they're being bred out of existence in their own countries. The radically different levels of scrutiny these people apply to foreign threats depending if those threaten their personal power tells you (((who))) exactly is behind them.

>Hillary being corrupt is ridiculous
>People think this just because they're biased!

Yep, has nothing to do with the hundreds of thousands of her crew's emails released over the past few years, plus more on the Foundation.

>present multiple fake polls of the election
>results prove that most media outlets are bought, corrupt and FAKE
>N-n-n-no u!
This is just sad, they were caught red-handed and now are trying to spin it around.

>russian hackers
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, holy shit, even going for your classic convenient propaganda enemy
>those god damn commi-i mean russians! God damn russians!
Jesus, how low can you get?

We need to retaliate for this shit. We can't let Russia fuck with us like this.

>Has anyone noticed that everything the Left accuses us of, they do themselves?

In World War 2, tens of thousands of Polish were executed in massacres in and around the forests of Katyn, and buried in mass graves in 1941. The USSR informed the world that the corpses were those of Polish PoWs engaged in construction work, summarily executed by the Nazis during their advance in Operation Barbarossa. The Nazis released a story saying they'd "found" the mass graves when they got there.

In the late 1990s after the formal collapse of the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation admitted that the corpses in the mass graves of Katyn were those of Polish intelligentsia including cultural elite, lawyers, priests, professors as well as most of the Polish Officer Corps, that they had been there since 1940, and that they had been massacred by the NKVD on a Stalin-approved order. They also admitted that the Soviet Union had pre-emptively blamed Nazi Germany, dismissed their statement as anti-Soviet propaganda, covered it up, and denied it for half a century.

>EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH US IS A RUSSIAN AGENT! DONT TRUST THEM!
It's literally McCarthyism all over again.

The only difference is that some of the people McCarthy accused of being involve with the Russians actually were.

>Washington Post
>respected
HAAHAHAHAHAHAH

When in doubt break out the old russophobic rhetoric

(((Craig Timberg)))

>Wikileaks

Well Juilan is dead, and wikileaks has been take over by a CIA psy-ops team. Yes, it's fake NOW

bezos post

Got any links man

this fake news crap sounds like an ancap meme

They're going after Elon Musk now.

Why? Well, his re-usable rockets are a major threat to the Russian space launch industry, he's already out-competing them on price even before launching a single re-used rocket.

bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-22/elon-musk-vs-the-trolls

So what is this "undeniable evidence" that most conservative news outlets are controlled by Russia?

You're not looking at it clearly, which is my point. None of those emails provide solid proof of corruption, just as there is no solid proof of Trump's racism. Is Clinton corrupt? Probably. Is Trump racist? Probably. Are they both morally bankrupt and unfit to be president? Most definitely, but there's no real evidence to substantiate to the most common ad hominems.

Lol, this website only appeared this year and there is no way to verify who actually owns it or who has selected these "fake news" sites.

Seems legit

I'm with RT. Ask anything.

Here's another example of a leftist tendency.

When you call them out on something, their response is "THE RIGHT DOES IT TOO!".

So if you say something about the Soviet Union or North Korea, they'll say "AMERICA DOES IT TOO!" As if that's somehow an argument.

>None of those emails provide solid proof of corruption

Should I dump my small collection?

>>None of those emails provide solid proof of corruption

>>>None of those emails provide solid proof of corruption

>I'm with RT. Ask anything.

Do you get the giggles when something RT publishes results in western butthurt?

>>>>None of those emails provide solid proof of corruption

>>>>>None of those emails provide solid proof of corruption

1. Fuck off.

>>>>>>None of those emails provide solid proof of corruption

I can keep going.

>fake news
I've been seeing this meme a lot the past week or so. What exactly do they mean by this?
I don't think they're talking about sites like The Onion, because they're openly satire (and push a leftist agenda). It seems like they are only applying this label to any of the right leaning news sites.
Is this just the MSM's attempt at retaining any semblance of legitimacy after their embarrassing election coverage? Label any other news org, label any detractor as "fake" until the people choose to believe you?

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Like when they ran this story;

archive.is/8jwjh

About niggers who claimed they were called niggers? Except, of course, it was proven false;

archive.is/lYPMP

Or when they ran this story about a nigger who claimed she was told to fuck off because she's a nigger?

archive.is/fUSsu

Except, of course, it was proven false;

archive.is/pDzER

Are you guys going to report on this? I'm interested in the "other" perspective on the story.

bbc.com/news/world-europe-38056242

the analysis of those sites by non-partisan experts concluded Russia is behind it. just take their word for it, why would they lie?

that's without even mentioning the tranny porn CNN played for 30 fucking minutes in Boston. The fake news thing was conjured the minute Trump won. They look desperate, nobody's buying it

Facebook and Twitter started it by blocking "fake news" (news that Liberals don't agree with).

Now the MSM keeps bringing up "fake news" to drill it into people's heads that only they are to be trusted and anyone alternative news source is fake.

doubling down on propaganda and using blatant lies and doublespeak as a pretext to censor dissent. jews are this scared

Russia is better than Saudi Arabia.

Please do. I need images and wikileaks urls to BTFO anyone saying that Hillary wasn't proven to be corrupt.

I only have a few more fun ones. Sup Forums should have a full archive somewhere.

Far lefties always project their own inadequacies on detractors. It has to do with the self hate they feel and mask at all times

The libtards on my kikebuch are eating it up.