So are you fags gonna spam us again or get into some real debate this time?
Cooper Watson
I still haven't received justification for why I should hate Jews.
Give me ONE (1) good reason why I should hate Jews.
David Russell
>Anarchists, Socialists, Communists, and Social Freedom Fighters! Get in here
>retard containment thread
Camden Nelson
Aren't most Sovereign Citizens right wing?
Landon Jones
thanks for joining, fellow 'tard
Colton Nguyen
Who here wants some THICC?
Tyler Smith
You wouldn't. Your ideology was founded by one.
Blake Adams
>implying I'm a communist
Parker Garcia
But all those ideologies have a fundamental misunderstanding of reality built into the worldview.
Gabriel Reyes
And rightist ideologies do not?
Julian Butler
You're a faggot
Brandon Hill
share your rare /leftypol/s guys
Ethan Harris
>tfw no argument I didn't think so.
Gavin Howard
Only rightist ideologies that predicate themselves of the lie of equality.
Brandon Price
I'm not arguing, I'm dictating. You're a faggot.
Oliver Collins
what rightist ideologies do not?
James Adams
Whereas right wing ideologies delude themselves with social darwinism
Brandon Lopez
Lefty here, why the fuck would you ever support Hillary???
Christian Allen
expand the OP image genius
Sebastian Murphy
sayj
Tyler Ortiz
I don't support her. I'd just rather avoid the potential leftist crackdown Trump's administration could go on. See: Dakota Pipeline, but everywhere.
Nicholas Foster
Sage is not a downvote, my misguided newfag cancer
what would we do about all the bad shit she'd bring?
Angel White
That's a good question. The lie is taught to so many that by now almost everyone believes it. And it's not a malicious lie told to deceive you, but rather a misunderstanding that lead us to try an live a philosophical impossibility. So any society that bases itself on equality or 'equal individuals' is problematic.
Logan Murphy
kill yourself you deluded cognitively dissonant brain damaged sperm sucker
Lincoln Scott
What do you mean?
She'd have maintain the status quo for us making it easier to organize underground. Trump though seems like he'll be a disaster and perhaps even help us more, I realize now.
Gavin Ross
... so none of them? lloll
Leo Reyes
u mad??
Nicholas Long
you guys really think shitposting om Sup Forums using CTR memes will make people support your side?
Anthony Ramirez
None on the left and maybe NatSoc on the right. But I personally don't like NatSoc economic policy
Levi Lee
Fuck off newfag fuck
Benjamin Foster
>She'd have maintain the status quo for us Who's to say they weren't going to initiate the next phase of repression under her? I don't see how she would have been any safer for anti-goverment organizing than Trump. Prove me wrong, by all means.
John Gutierrez
why are defending porkys(jews) comrade? Do you want the good goy award?
Ryan Jones
You're even fedoraposting your own post because that's how big of a faggot you are.
Joseph Turner
you are the one throwing a tantrum because big mean mister twump huwt your wittle feewings. go drown in your tears, but only after you prep your wifes bull.
Adrian Gray
>Bump goes in the option field!
Jesus you really are a new fag
Carson Morgan
>i-i have no argument but i need to let this guy no how much i hates him! >i-i know, i'll just shout "fedora!" >heh heh, gotcha, kiddo
Josiah Ward
Because I know capitalists are the problem, no specific ethnic group.
Obama was the status quo
Josiah King
...
Benjamin Foster
and hillary isn't?
Jason Ross
She is. That's exactly my point.
Gabriel Hall
Question session open
Brandon Jones
I see. But Hillary's victory would have emboldened the elite to make even more power grabs. It seems that she was willing to be an even bigger puppet than he was, especially since she's not even really much of a eftist nor has she ever been.
Thomas Russell
>Because I know capitalists are the problem, no specific ethnic group.
M8 do you even know the weight israel has over the USA politics? If you cant see the exploitation of the worker class by foreign powers and how those powers are trying to undermine a stable country not only with class warfare but also with racial warfare then you are just a useful idiot that is playing on porky hands just because you don't to be labeled as antisemitic
Daniel King
link?
Caleb Gutierrez
Marx's dialectic are an evolution, right? but what exactly is there to suggest that the next step of evolution after capitalism in particular is to a socialist government, other than Marx's say-so? after all, the only parties to implement socialist states (to my knowledge) were explicitly acting on his theories. has a socialist state ever occurred outside of people acting on Marx's instructions?
furthermore, what exactly is going to spur the evolution from socialist state to communist anarchy? when does the party concede its power? why hasn't that occurred or come close to occurring in any of the socialist states that have existed?
these questions really make me think and would appreciate it if some lefties could help me answer them
Mason Jones
Fpbp liberals are evil and this nation will burn before real Americans let them rule it again.
Jason Peterson
i just going to leave this here
Jack Reed
iirc it goes like this
as the capitalists compete against each other, there becomes a greater and greater centralization of the means of production and of wealth. gradually, all the competition falls away and monopolies emerge. at the same time, living conditions and pay nosedive at the same time that prices rise. the conditions will become so intolerable that revolt becomes inevitable.
it goes like that. think of what is happening in the ISP market.
Henry Lopez
Why should a god fearing conservative like me support the left liberals?
Austin Moore
DELET HIS
Benjamin Rivera
Let them come and soon... they will be fully converted. More blood for the blood God.
>one of us
Logan Rodriguez
okay, I can accept the theory that a worker's revolution is inevitable, although it does seem like a bit of an assumption to me. but even if a revolt does happen, who's to say that it will result in socialism? why not fascism like in the Weimar Republic, or some sort of theocracy like in Iran? or even, why not just another crony capitalist dictator?
Gavin Ortiz
you shouldn't really. but SJWs are much worse. liberals want you to accept your neighbor for who they are and judge them only for their actions, and only on an individual basis.
Jason Richardson
Anarchist for Trump here. Am I welcome?
Chase Bennett
i lurked on leftypol for a year and i truly hope one day we can both gas porky and the (((jews))) together, but you guys need to stop with the whole gobbunism will dominate the world
Kayden Miller
what socialism means is that the means of production are controlled by the people. if the people revolt, why would they let this power fall into the hands of a dictator? and what does this have to do with religion?
>all Jews are Israeli >let's ignore that there are top donors who aren't Jewish >let's ignore that Jewish donors give to both sides
Matthew Gray
...
Austin Martin
...
Ian Campbell
...
Caleb Myers
...
Elijah Wilson
...
Ryan Phillips
>but what exactly is there to suggest that the next step of evolution after capitalism in particular is to a socialist government
Marx didn't say it certainly would succeed capitalism, rather, he constructed it specifically as a system that could succeed capitalism and resolve it's contradictions. It's not an evolution per se.
>furthermore, what exactly is going to spur the evolution from socialist state to communist anarchy
This question has no definite answers. Every socialist has a different interpretation and a different idea of how to ensure the state withers away and leads to communism.
Anarcho-communists believe the state can be destroyed right after a revolution. I believe that the state can be reconstituted into an organization of trade unions and worker councils that cooperate and protect the revolution from external threats. Marxist-Leninists believe a vanguard party would lead the resistance and protect the revolution.
>why hasn't that occurred or come close to occurring in any of the socialist states that have existed?
All of those revolutions have occurred in feudal state, which is certainly the reason for their failure
Austin Perez
...
Sebastian Foster
...
Christopher Bennett
...
Gavin Cook
...
Henry Bailey
not an argument
Jace Jenkins
Let me know when you have something to say to us besides sexual ad hominem.
Angel Bailey
seems right
Xavier Murphy
>if the people revolt, why would they let this power fall into the hands of a dictator?
this happens on a very regular basis. every revolution has a leader, or a group of leaders, and power is instilled as much by armament and ammunition as it is by ideology. I'm just saying that whatever the leaders of the revolution decide will happen to the state is what happens, and that this does not necessarily result in socialism. and yet Marx presents socialism as the natural next step in the process, as if it would happen even if he hadn't written about it at all
Brayden Davis
SJW bring degeneracy and degeneracy is the fall of man.
Liberals have weaken Europe. All that the muslims need to do is rape their women and convert the future generation into Islam.
Nolan Howard
youcan not defeat the 14 words
give it a go, if you like, or give up, overpriviliged retarded faggot scum
Samuel Taylor
>this happens on a very regular basis I'm talking about revolts against capitalism motivated solely by economic concerns no it doesn't
Landon Jenkins
>hey look guys! i'm retarded :D >if i show off my mental handicap in an argument, i'll certainly win!
Kayden Green
Sage
Lucas Johnson
>So Jooz u
Levi Edwards
>which is certainly the reason for their failure Incorrect. By definition individuality and equality are mutually exclusive. Communism is predicated on the idea of a classless state. A society of equal individuals. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of reality that will lead to consequences. We can either be individuals or equals, but not both at the same time. To try and force this philosophical falsehood on ourselves dooms us from the beginning.
Zachary Phillips
>browses /q/ opinion discarded commie scum.
Jaxon Rodriguez
SJW =/= Liberal
Cooper Russell
Your ID >JOO >JEW
Nice try.
Jack Morgan
sorry, with respect(undeserved) how does that defeat the 14 words?)
Samuel Hall
>By definition individuality and equality are mutually exclusive
post the definitions post the definitions
Nathaniel Miller
>if i show off my mental handicap in an argument, i'll certainly win!
Mason Lewis
why don't you confirm ou know what I mean be the 14 words, then tell me why I am wrong, oh wise sage
Sebastian Ramirez
fpbp
wonder how many cocks the OP has sucked today
Kayden Green
>We can either be individuals or equals, but not >both at the same time.
I've noticed this is a very common conception. I'm going to recommend that you check out Max Stirner and his philosophy of Egoism: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoist_anarchism
Angel Perez
If we are unique individuals, then we are not equal. The inequality is implied by our uniqueness as individuals. We can either be unique individuals in a constant state of inequality stemming from our uniqueness, or we can be equals. That's the nature of individuality and equality. They are mutually exclusive states of being.
Joshua Morales
Communism is not about equality.
Parker Richardson
It's about a classless society of social EQUALS. >there's that misunderstanding again
