America was literally founded by refugees fleeing from religious persecution

America was literally founded by refugees fleeing from religious persecution.

How come Americans are against refugees now?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924
bxscience.edu/ourpages/auto/2009/4/5/34767803/Pre-Columbian population.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

because their retards

We've never been against Europeans immigrating here.

i can confirm this

Because it's 2016

Because they were ultra-nationalist, genocidal conquerors.

>never
>what is the Irish migration

because even if they don't realise it, they know that when they arrived they slaughtered the native populations and don't fancy the same happening to them.

BEECAUSE THEY"RE THE WRONG KIND OF REFUGEE

FFS HANS I DON'T EVEN....

1. The pilgrims were only one of the many groups that founded the north american colonies
2. They were colonists, not refugees
3. They were white and not fucking worthless shitskins

...

no they were not refugees and you now equating refugees to american settlers only proves everyones point that refugees aren't refugees.

Because the people "fleeing persecution" cut off peoples heads for being a different religion and blow themselves up in order to get to the afterlife.

Why would we want what happened to the Indians to happen to us?

>settlers
>call them refugees

you should actually kill yourself

this

>founded by refugees

The word you're looking for is COLONISTS.

If you're not fluent in our language and don't understand our history, you probably have no business commenting on United States' business.

Now run along and rape a goat, Mohammed.

The natives were not slaughtered. Not most of the tribes anyway. We fought wars with a lot of them, some because they allied with the french, some because they were savage faggots who couldn't help but slaughter white settlements for horses and guns.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924

/thread

BECAUSE WE ARE FULL

>their
What about our retards?

sure. But look at America now- the few that remain are literally put into reservations, i.e. human zoos.

Founded by refugees is different than k faded by illegals trying to milk the system Hans you daft fucking prick

>How come Americans are against refugees now?
Because they're not.

Only 62 million of American voted for Trump.
Just for info, they are 318,9 millions inhabitant in USA.

not a argument

Let's ask the native americans what they think of the humans they were gifted!
Oh wait, nobody cares, because it's not their country anymore...

They weren't refugees they were just autistic spergs.

Look what the European immigrants created. Muslim immigrants and hispanic immigrants are only good at destroying. Don't be dense.

Because they are religious persecutors

Keyword is "illegal" you fucking sandnigger

It would probably put excess stress on their economy and increase competition

>"refugees" come and settle
>kill almost the entire native population and supplant their culture

maybe we should learn a lesson or two and not let it happen to us

You do realize there were many different groups of people were settling in the new world for many different reasons. And on top of that, it wasn't like the pilgrims were poor shitskins with nothing to offer. Getting here wasn't a cheap thing any fucker could do.

You need view the colonization of the US like you would the eventual colonization of Mars. Different powers and interests fighting for control over territory, sending only the very best for the job. Then eventually they all say fuck it and go their own way united as one.

They were colonists.

fuck off, leftypol

And they enjoy the benefits of our welfare programs, additional welfare programs just for them, and yet are still technically sovereign. There are far more more natives, or at least "natives", now then there were when the white man arrived, their lifespan has doubled, and their quality of life is infinitely higher. They should be thankful. For all that, and that we put down the fucking comanche.

t. history revisionist

>America was literally founded by refugees fleeing from religious persecution.

They were fleeing religious freedom. They were intolerant, murderous fundamentalists.

>318,9 million
>318,9
>8,9
>,
>,,,,,,,,,

Learn basic decimals you retarded sour-kraut. No wonder Morocco is literally ahead of your countries education. Google it faggot.

The existing native americans were mostly from a second wave of migrants from siberia, who displaced and destroyed the first wave. But that was in pre-recorded history because native americans never had written language, so it doesn't count, right?

So, this one is more up to date.
Only 64 million people voted for Trump.
>>Less than 20% of American people voted for Trump.

GET IN HERE LEFTISTS
For those who are educated, get in here:
We will take back Sup Forums as our first step, there will be no more shills as their bait will be ignored.

kek confirms

it's like you can't stop yourself from revising history. it's like automatic for you

Sorry, but I have to let off steam here.

Everyone seems to be bashing European politicians for letting in refugees and not doing enough to stop terroristic attacks.

As to the refugees, of course they are an incredible burden for Germany and other European countries. But what do you want to do if not let them in? You can't close the borders (see Schengen and the most fundamental elements of the EU). In my opinion, you can't send them back or just let them die on their own, because that's not only cruel but also selfish as f***. We have the capabilities of taking them in, the majority of these people are the most thankful and giving members in our whole society. And if other EU countries, or the US, or just anybody would have agreed to at least take in a fraction of the number Sweden took in, no country would have been in much trouble to give them a new home.

And what about the terrorists? First off, the majority of terrorists aren't refugees. Check that on Wikipedia or whereever you like. Most of them are radicalised at home or in the internet. And those who came as refugees would have found another way, no doubt. It's easy to get to Europe. This place is so open in any way, you just cannot give 100% security. As many of you might know, "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.".

So for god's sake let these people live here, let us deal with islamistic hotspots and the real culprits, but don't blame an entire group that is 99.9% peaceful.

They are like a pigeon in a cage, then? It's a nice way to live I guess, you get fed and cared for and after all- freedom to starve is no freedom at all- but at the end of the day they are completely irrelevant, just a pet of the white man.

t. Retard

>there are more "natives" today than 250 years ago
Please cite this so I can throw it in people's faces

>expecting a history revisionist to have correct sources or even any sources of info at all

We're against rapefugees, not refugees.

We're full

lie

there are more pigs on farms today than there were in the wild at any point
that means it's better for them to be meat slaves than to be free!!

When a certain group of people, in this case the retarded akbar shitskins, make your country an obectively worse place anywhere they are found 100% of the time, people tend to catch on that they are scum.

And to be fair we've seen where religious freedom leads.

This is true though

They can move anywhere they want within the country same as any other citizen, they just can also move to or remain on the reservation where they are free to govern themselves as they choose. They have literally more freedom than an ordinary citizen, AND more gibs, while paying less taxes.

Here the perfect one.
Only 19.20% of American People voted for Donald Trump.

This

Implying refugees can't be colonists too. Germany is being colonized

>refugees fleeing from religious persecution.

that's a fallacy.
they were relocating so they'd have the right to religiously persecute others.

> it severely restricted the immigration of Africans and outright banned the immigration of Arabs and Asians
I forgot, Italy is an Arabic country.

>germany then
Literaly the only country were good values were practiced, woman were protected and white people were respected

>germany now
They are week and patethic, they let dirty brown man rape their woman and do literaly NOTHING AGAINST IT
if some one tries to bad talk then they are arrested


>what happened

Let off steam on Kikebook. Also, Nobody in Europe has a magic obligation to take in millions of people, not even as a "basic human understanding". Even if 100% were completely peaceful, you still have all of them leaching off welfare because nobody will give them jobs- they can't speak the host language.

Please read about the problems with mass immigration before stumbling in here with half thought out arguments you got from Facebook. Lurk more, newfag.

We're full, fuck off. Unless you want to wage war, then bring it.

True.

The USA was founded on indian lands by refugees who ended up murdering all the indians.

So it's totally cool to let millions of refugees into europe, after all, they might murder us all and found the united muslim states.

American Colonists came to a howling wilderness to build a new life out of fucking nothing.

Mudslimes are going to an existing civilization and demanding Gibs.

Big difference.

Because we moved in and killed the indigenous population and as part of the current indigenous population I don't feel like being killed.

The most recent estimates of pre-colombian natives in modern america are approximately 3 and a half million

bxscience.edu/ourpages/auto/2009/4/5/34767803/Pre-Columbian population.pdf

There are over 6 million natives in america today.

It wasn't a welfare state. You had to earn your keep.

...

We stole it fair and square.

Its why we are against mass refugee waves btw. The Muslims are going to steal your country fair and square too.

'Muricans were trying to shine light on the dark savages by bringing medicine and a better way of living, but all they cared about was the alcohol cause in the end, they're lazy savages who only care about fighting, not using their brain or working hard. Same goes for the """"refugees"""" Brown skinned people are just like women, and that's why women want them here, so they don't feel bad for not being as good as White men, since they not have to work like we do.

Remember when you guys used to cleanse the people that were ruining your country?
Now you accept them with open buttcheeks

huh. Then it sounds like you guys have yet another cancer to cut out.

hey nigger why dont you stop being such a nigger u nigger

when refugees come over to your country there are two possible outcomes

they integrate into existing culture
they wipe out existing culture.

guess which one our forefathers did and why we are against refugees who try to do the same.

Remember? Mexican will pay for it.
Retards

No potato niggers allowed

At least the niggers in my country are in prison not in my ass or my goats ass.

You have to remember, for most of american history this was a risky move. People who were disillusoned with the situation in Europe moved across the ocean and started from scratch. This required innovation and creativity, on their part. You were not just handed a government issued house and job.
While the original americans were almost all Englishmen or Anglo-Saxons in general, over the years other Europeans joined them and brough many of their values. This worked very well for the protestant nationals such as the Germans who brought their hard work ethic and culture or the dutch who brought their merchantile guile.
Mixing the English, Germans, French, Dutch and eventual Eastern Europeans created a mix of the greatest peoples on earth during the last centuries. The greatest innovations in science and tech were made almost entirely by these people (and don't forget the Jews).
The Italians produced a great deal of value but their ties to catholicism meant they were linked to the oppressive regimes of europe which many had fled from in the first place. They also consisted of many mixed southerners who were a lazy and violent group (see mafia).

TLDR: Americans have always been against those who did not share their values.

/thread

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924

>There were nine dissenting votes in the Senate[9] and a handful of opponents in the House, the most vigorous of whom was freshman Brooklyn Representative and Jewish-American Emanuel Celler.

Always right.

America is still very Puritan. It's why sin taxes exist.

At least our immigrants bring tacos and over developed jail bait instead of smelly, goat fisters whose main import is sodomy and sexual emergencies.

The Indians didn't provide welfare

Haha says Ahmed the "German." Go back to Syria.

>You had to earn your keep
>literally imported slaves because they were too lazy to pick crops

go back to shartia

Trump just cucked you.
Admit it.

Stop spamming this bullshit Adolf.

>Hispanic

*Mestizos

YOU'RE ANTI WHITE

YOU'RE BLAMING MESTIZO MEXICAN BEANER CRIME ON HISPANICS AS A WHOLE

SPAIN IS HISPANIC

YOU'RE BLAMING MESTIZO CRIMES ON THE SPANISH MAN

BLAME LATINOS

NOT PEOPLE OF PURE HISPANIA HERITAGE YOU ANTI WHITE KIKE

America was founded by EUROPEANS fleeing religious persecution not MUDSHITS seeking to expand muslim influence and persecute christians.

>irish
>european

they are africans dude.

america was founded by FAIL and AIDS

Because those refugees are brown and thus fuck them.

No really, fuck all non-whites.

Spain is shit skin now

I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the dying screams of your men and the lamentations of your women echoing from Dresden.

>fuck all non-whites.
This sounds so gay.

This.
Every.
Single.
Time.