What does Sup Forums think about feudalism? Would such a system work in a modern society...

What does Sup Forums think about feudalism? Would such a system work in a modern society? Or maybe an alternate version of it?

what are you talking about? You live under such a system now. It never left

source?

president
ministers
regional presidents
province presidents
majors

The only difference is that at least back then we governed ourselves instead of foreing interest

Hello Baltic-bro. What's it like back home?

>you see our society has hierarchies therefore we still life in feudalism

Gotta agree with this, in the classical feudalism the monarch ruled all, now it's all bankers and corporates.

Also where exactly would feudalism be located in a political spectrum?

You forgot the cleric class there.

Peasants - wagecucks
Knights - military
nobles - capitalists
king - political elites and big corporations

Aren't merchants between peasants and knights? Or even on the same level as knights?

King
Noble
Clergy
Knights
Merchants
Peasants

meh

>Peasants - wagecucks
>Knights - military
>nobles - capitalists
>king - political elites and big corporations

Texas is correct

yep its called capitalism

capitalism is already an alternate version of feudalism

Bankers
Big Business Owners
Government
Small Business Owners
Military
Wage workers

If you're going to include Clergy, Pope goes on top.

Feudalism is the best. It takes away political power from dumb libs and nigs and gives it to people who have been trained from birth to govern.

humanity was always a pyramid scheme; you're a moron if you didn't notice this. it's usually better when capable people are allowed to move up, and the people on the top can crush and kill those on the bottom

either bait or stupid

I'm stupid, enlighten me.

Not really, in the feudal system lords and nobles didn't live substantially much better than everyone else and religion and chivalry dictated much of their lives. They also had to fulfil the responsible offices of church and law. It's a lie that all landowning gentry did was sit around and host guests, they had to sit on magistrates in court, organize taxation and also single handedly advanced science and medicine.

This
and this

The idea of Feudalism is that castes are decided by blood

witch isnt the best to be honest, but its beter then democracy:
castes are decided by how good of a liar you are.

The perfect is that castes are decided by how much of an Übermensch you are.

I call it tribal federationism.
There are autonomous tribes consisting of 3-4 clans. Every tribe has a leader that succeded to gain respect from his tribe for good leadership.
For defensive reasons and scientific advancement the most impressive tribe leader get legitimized by the other tribe leaders of his tribe group as the leader of that group. He becomes responsible for organization of defense and science.

In this system every human is able to get respect for his personal work and follow his ambitions. There is no social tenses as the societys are small, and everyone is somehow related to everyone else. The crime rate is very low for the same reason. No huge differences between rich and poor because the talented businessman cant abuse anyone without geting lynched. Literally everyone profits from advance and succes without the system being marxistic in any way.

This then

>It takes away political power from dumb libs and nigs and gives it to people who have been trained from birth to govern

No it takes away power from 99.99% of ppl, no mater what race.Look at mediaval Europe if arent born noble or in a town(free man), you are a serf

>implying libs and nigs aren't accounted for in that 99.99%
Yeah, what's the problem with that? I wouldn't trust 99.99% of people to rule me.

Pope never had 'direct' control over the monarchy though, but essentially the right to rule of the Monarchy came from God (they also toyed with myths-the tudors claimed descent from Arthur) so if they didn't have his support they could be ousted by foreign claimants who did which is basically what happened to Harold Godwinson. Still European monarchs frequently cared nothing for the Pope and blatantly defied the church.

3% of the people are 130IQ and more

What he means that is decided by blood who rules.
The thing is that this is against evolution.
Its not likely that the same genepool will evolve over and over again, those denieing intellectual progress of the leadership.
A lot of smart people are born due to mutation of the genes.

>nobles
>vassals
You have one, or the other, obliterate those sods the moment they have no land to defend themselves.
t. Henry VI

>What is 1500 years of Europian history?

Ideal form of government for small states which are also probably ideal, but I really do like a massive empire.

Well it's not like the British queen grants special shit to people who bravely "fought" for the Kingdom with their banking powers or by manipulating the US military and politics.

FPBP

Nothing has really changed.

It's already doing a comeback.

Jews at top.
Brown sludge in 6 garillion SJW decided castes bellow.
White people a crushed archaeological curiosity under the pyramid.

no upward mobility dissensentivizes innovation, productivity, so and so forth

High class
mid class
low class